Matching perceived depth from disparity and from velocity: Modeling and psychophysics

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 133, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 81-89

  Domini, Fulvio ^a   Caudek, Corrado ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

3D shape; Depth; Disparity; Motion; Perception; Perceptual biases; Scaling; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 74249118603     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Baird J.C., and Biersdorf W.R. Quantitative functions for size and distance judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 2 (1967) 161-166
2. Bates, D. M., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, R package version 0.99875-6.
3. Battro A.M., Netto S.P., and Rozestraten R.J.A. Riemannian geometries of variable curvature in visual space: Visual alleys, horopters, and triangles in big open fields. Perception 5 (1976) 9-23
4. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R (2008), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Bradshaw M.F., Glennerster A., and Rogers B.J. The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues. Vision Research 36 (1996) 1255-1264
6. Bradshaw M.F., Parton A.D., and Glennerster A. The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information. Vision Research 40 (2000) 3725-3734
7. Brenner E., and Landy M.S. Interaction between the perceived shape of two objects. Vision Research 39 (1999) 3834-3848
8. Brenner E., and van Damme W.J. Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Research 39 (1999) 975-986
9. Caudek C., and Domini F. Perceived orientation of axis of rotation in structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 609-621
10. Caudek C., and Proffitt D.R. Depth perception in motion parallax and stereokinesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 32-47
11. Caudek C., and Rubin N. Segmentation in structure from motion: Modeling and psychophysics. Vision Research 41 (2001) 2715-2732
12. Collett T.S., Schwarz U., and Sobel E.C. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy. Perception 20 (1991) 733-754
13. Cuijpers R.H., Kappers A.M.L., and Koenderink J.J. Investigation of visual space using an exocentric pointing task. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1556-1571
14. Cuijpers R.H., Kappers A.M.L., and Koenderink J.J. Large systematic deviations in visual parallelism. Perception 29 (2000) 1467-1482
15. Di Luca M., Domini F., and Caudek C. Spatial integration in structure from motion. Vision Research 44 (2004) 3001-3013
16. Di Luca M., Domini F., and Caudek C. The relation between disparity and velocity signals of rigidly moving objects constrains depth order perception. Vision Research 25 (2007) 1335-1349
17. Domini F., and Braunstein M.L. Recovery of 3-D structure from motion is neither Euclidean nor affine. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1273-1295
18. Domini F., and Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 426-444
19. Domini F., and Caudek C. 3D structure perceived from dynamic information: A new theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 444-449
20. Domini F., and Caudek C. Recovering slant and angular velocity from a linear velocity field: Modeling and psychophysics. Vision Research 43 (2003) 1753-1764
21. Domini F., and Caudek C. The intrinsic constraint model and Fechnerian sensory scaling. Journal of Vision 9 2 (2009) pp. 25, 1-15
22. Domini F., Caudek C., and Proffitt D.R. Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1111-1129
23. Domini F., Caudek C., and Richman S. Distortions of depth-order relations and parallelism in structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 60 (1998) 1164-1174
24. Domini F., Caudek C., and Skirko P. Temporal integration of motion and stereo cues to depth. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 48-57
25. Domini F., Caudek C., and Tassinari H. Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1707-1723
26. Domini F., Caudek C., Turner J., and Favretto A. Discriminating constant from variable angular velocities in structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 60 (1998) 747-760
27. Domini F., Vuong Q.C., and Caudek C. Temporal integration in structure from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 (2002) 816-838
28. Fisher K.S., and Ciuffreda K.J. Accommodation and apparent distance. Perception 17 (1988) 609-621
29. Frisby J.P., Buckley D., and Duke P.A. Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing. Perception 25 (1996) 129-154
30. Gilinsky A.S. Perceived size and di stance in visual space. Psychological Review 58 (1951) 460-482
31. Glennerster A., Rogers B.J., and Bradshaw M.F. Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task. Vision Research 36 (1996) 3441-3456
32. Glennerster A., Rogers B.J., and Bradshaw M.F. Cues to viewing distance for stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception 27 (1998) 1357-1365
33. Harway N.I. Judgment of distance in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1963) 385-390
34. Hillis J.M., Watt S.J., Landy M.S., and Banks M.S. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 4 12 (2004) pp. 1, 967-992
35. Hogervorst M.A., and Eagle R.A. The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 934-955
36. Johnston E.B. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research 31 (1991) 1351-1360
37. Johnston E.B., Cumming B.G., and Landy M.S. Integration of motion and stereopsis cues. Vision Research 34 (1994) 2259-2275
38. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Kappers A.M.L., and Todd J.T. Pappus in optical space. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (2002) 380-391
39. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., and Lappin J.S. Direct measurement of the curvature of visual space. Perception 29 (2000) 69-79
40. Longuet-Higgins H.C., and Prazdny K. The Interpretation of a Moving Retinal Image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 208 (1980) 385-397
41. Loomis J.M., Da Silva J.A., Fujita N., and Fukusima S.S. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 906-921
42. Loomis J.M., and Philbeck J.W. Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale?. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (1999) 397-402
43. Norman J.F., Crabtree C.E., Clayton A.M., and Norman H.F. The perception of distances and spatial relationships in natural outdoor environments. Perception 34 (2005) 1315-1324
44. Norman J.F., Lappin J.S., and Norman H.F. The perception of length on curved and flat surfaces. Perception & Psychophysics 62 (2000) 1133-1145
45. Norman J.F., and Todd J.T. Stereoscopic discrimination of interval and ordinal depth relations on smooth surfaces and in empty space. Perception 27 (1998) 257-272
46. Norman J.F., Todd J.T., Perotti V.J., and Tittle J.S. The visual perception of three-dimensional length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 173-186
47. Pinheiro J.C., and Bates D.M. Mixed-effects models in s and s-plus (2000), Springer-Verlag, New York
48. Proffitt D.R., and Caudek C. Depth perception and the perception of events. In: Healy A.F., and Proctor R.W. (Eds). Comprehensive handbook of psychology. Experimental psychology Vol. 4 (2002), Wiley, New York 213-236
49. Quené H., and Van den Bergh H. On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication 43 (2004) 103-121
50. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2009), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 3-900051-07-0.
51. Tassinari H., Domini F., and Caudek C. The intrinsic constraint model for stereo-motion integration. Perception 37 (2008) 79-95
52. Tittle J.S., Todd J.T., Perotti V.J., and Norman J.F. Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 663-678
53. Todd J.T. Perception of structure from motion: Is projective correspondence of moving elements a necessary condition?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985) 689-710
54. Todd J.T., and Bressan P. The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics 48 (1990) 419-430
55. Todd J.T., and Norman J.F. The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure?. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 31-47
56. Todd J.T., Oomes A.H.J., Koenderink J.J., and Kappers A.M.L. On the affine structure of perceptual space. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 191-196
57. Tresilian J.R., and Mon-Williams M. Getting the measure of vergence weight in nearness perception. Experimental Brain Research 132 (2000) 362-368
58. Tresilian J.R., Mon-Williams M., and Kelly B.M. Increasing confidence in vergence as a distance cue. Proceedings of the Royal Society B266 (1999) 39-44
59. Ullman S. The interpretation of visual motion (1979), MIT Press, Cambrige, MA
60. Wichmann F.A., and Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception & Psychophysics 63 8 (2001) 1293-1313
61. Wichmann F.A., and Hill N.J. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception & Psychophysics 63 8 (2001) 1314-1329