Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 426-444

  Domini, Fulvio ^a,b   Caudek, Corrado ^a  

^a AREA Science Park ^*  (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISION;

ANISOTROPY; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISION;

EID: 0033110980     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.2.426     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bennett, B. M., Hoffman, D. D., Nicola, J. E., & Prakash, C. (1989). Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A6, 1052-1069.
2. Braunstein, M. L. (1962). Depth perception in rotating dot patterns: Effects of numerosity and perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 415-420.
3. Braunstein, M. L. (1966). Sensitivity of the observer to transformations of the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 683-689.
4. Braunstein, M. L. (1968). Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 247-253.
5. Braunstein, M. L. (1976). Depth perception through motion. New York: Academic Press.
6. Braunstein, M. L. (1994). Decoding principles, heuristics and inference in visual perception. In G. Johansson, S. S. Bergstrom, & W. Epstein (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects (pp. 436-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Braunstein, M. L., & Andersen, G. (1981). Velocity gradients and relative depth perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 145-155.
8. Braunstein, M. L., & Andersen, G. (1984). A counterexample to the rigidity assumption in the visual perception of structure from motion. Perception, 13, 213-217.
9. Braunstein, M. L., Liter, C. J., & Tittle, J. S. (1993). Recovering three-dimensional shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 598-614.
10. Braunstein, M. L., & Tittle, J. S. (1988). The observer-relative velocity field as the basis for effective motion parallax. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 582-590.
11. Caudek, C., & Domini, F. (1998). Perceived orientation of axis of rotation in structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 609-621.
12. Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D. R. (1993). Depth perception in motion parallax and stereokinesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 32-47.
13. Clocksin, W. F. (1980). Perception of surface slant and edge labels from optical flow: A computational approach. Perception, 9, 253-269.
14. Cornilleau-Peres, V., & Droulez, J. (1989). Visual perception of surface curvature: Psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 351-364.
15. Domini, F., & Braunstein, M. L. (1998). Recovery of 3-D structure from motion is neither Euclidean nor affine. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1273-1295.
16. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D. R. (1997). Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1111-1129.
17. Domini, F., Caudek, C., Turner, J., & Favretto, A. (1998). Discriminating constant from variable angular velocities in structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 747-760.
18. Flock, H. R. (1964). A possible optical basis for monocular slant perception. Psychological Review, 71, 380-391.
19. Flock, H. R. (1965). Optical texture and linear perspective as stimuli for slant perception. Psychological Review, 72, 505-514.
20. Freeman, R. B. (1966). The effect of size on visual slant. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 96-103.
21. Freeman, T. C. A., Harris, M. G., & Meese, T. S. (1995). On the relationship between deformation and perceived surface slant. Vision Research, 35, 317-322.
22. Freeman, W. T. (1994). The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature, 368, 542-545.
23. Graham, M., & Rogers, B. (1982). Simultaneous and successive contrast effects in the perception of depth from motion-parallax and stereoscopic information. Perception, 11, 247-262.
24. Hoffman, D. D. (1982). Inferring local surface orientation from motion fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A72, 888-892.
25. Hoffman, D. D., & Bennett, B. M. (1985). Inferring the relative 3-D positions of two moving points. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A2, 350-533.
26. Hoffman, D. D., & Bennett, B. M. (1986). The computation of structure from fixed-axis motion: Rigid structures. Biological Cybernetics, 54, 71-83.
27. Hogervorst, M. A., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1996). Structure from motion: A tolerance analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 449-459.
28. Koenderink, J. J. (1986). Optic flow. Vision Research, 26, 161-179.
29. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doom, A. J. (1975). Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22, 773-791.
30. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doom, A. J. (1976). Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A66, 717-723.
31. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doom, A. J. (1990). Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A8, 377-385.
32. Koenderink, J. J., Van Doom, A. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (1992). Surface perception in pictures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 487-498.
33. Kraft, A. L., & Winnick, W. A. (1967). The effect of pattern and texture gradient on slant and shape judgements. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 449-459.
34. Liter, J. C., & Braunstein, M. L. (1998). The relationship of vertical and horizontal velocity gradients in the perception of shape, rotation, and rigidity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1257-1272.
35. Liter, J. C., Braunstein, M. L., & Hoffman, D. D. (1993). Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays. Perception, 22, 1441-1465.
36. Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Prazdny, K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 208, 385-397.
37. Loomis, J. M., & Eby, D. W. (1988). Perceiving structure from motion: Failure of shape constancy. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 383-391) Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
38. Norman, J. F., & Lappin, J. S. (1992). The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 386-396.
39. Norman, J. F., & Todd, J. T. (1995). The perception of 3-D structure from contradictory optical patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 826-834.
40. Olson, R. K. (1974). Slant judgements from static and rotating trapezoids correspond to rules of perspective geometry. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 509-516.
41. Ono, M. E., Rivest, J., & Ono, H. (1986). Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 331-337.
42. Perotti, V. J., & Todd, J. T. (in press). The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Perception & Pychophysics.
43. Pollick, F. E., Nishida, S., Koike, Y., & Kawato, M. (1994). Perceived motion in structure from motion: Pointing responses to the axis of rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 91-109.
44. Prazdny, K. (1980). Egomotion and relative depth map from optical flow. Biological Cybernetics, 36, 87-102.
45. Proffitt, D. R., & Kaiser, M. K. (1986). The use of computer graphics animation in motion perception research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 487-492.
46. Ramachandran, V. S. (1985). The neurobiology of perception. Perception, 14, 1-7.
47. Rogers, B. J., & Collett, T. S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 41A, 697-717.
48. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
49. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1982). Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research, 22, 261-270.
50. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1983). Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Science, 221, 1409-1411.
51. Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 509-523.
52. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MTT Press.