Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1707-1723

  Domini, Fulvio ^a   Caudek, Corrado ^b   Tassinari, Hadley ^c  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cue integration; Disparity; Motion; Vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDITY; VELOCITY; VISUAL SYSTEM;

CUES; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION TESTS; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 31844435566     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. D. Alais, and D. Burr The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration Current Biology 14 2004 257 262
2. B.T. Backus, M.S. Banks, R. van Ee, and J.A. Crowell Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception Vision Research 39 1999 1143 1170
3. D.R. Badcock, and C.M. Schor Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 1985 1211 1216
4. Banks, M. S., Watt, S. J., & Ernst, M. O. (2002). Screen cues to flatness affect 3D percepts [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2(10), 1a, http://journalofvision.org/2/10/1/, doi:10.1167/2.10.1.
5. C. Blakemore The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man Journal of Physiology 211 1970 599 622
6. M.F. Bradshaw, A.D. Parton, and R.A. Eagle The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size Perception 27 1998 1317 1333
7. M.F. Bradshaw, A.D. Parton, and A. Glennerster The task-dependent use of binocular diparity and motion parallax information Vision Research 40 2000 3725 3734
8. E. Brenner, and M.S. Landy Interaction between the perceived shape of two objects Vision Research 39 1999 3834 3848
9. E. Brenner, J.B.J. Smeets, and M.S. Landy How vertical disparities assist judgements of distance Vision Research 41 2001 3455 3465
10. E. Brenner, and W.J.M. van Damme Judging distance from ocular convergence Vision Research 38 1998 493 498
11. D. Buckley, and J.P. Frisby Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges Vision Research 33 1993 919 933
12. C. Caudek, and F. Domini Perceived orientation of axis rotation in structure-from-motion Journal of Experimental Psychology Human: Perception and Performance 24 1998 609 621
13. C. Caudek, and N. Rubin Segmentation in structure from motion: Modelling and psychophysics Vision Research 41 2001 2715 2732
14. J. Clark, and A. Yuille Data fusion for sensory information processing systems 1990 Kluwer Boston, MA
15. R.H. Cuijpers, A.M. Kappers, and J.J. Koenderink Investigation of visual space using anexocentric pointing task Perception & Psychophysics 62 2000 1556 1571
16. B.G. Cumming, E.B. Johnston, and A.J. Parker Vertical disparities and perception of 3-dimensional shape Nature 349 1991 411 413
17. M. Di Luca, F. Domini, and C. Caudek Spatial integration in structure from motion Vision Research 44 2004 3001 3013
18. F. Domini, and C. Caudek Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 25 1999 426 444
19. F. Domini, and C. Caudek Perception of slant and angular velocity from a linear velocity field modeling and psychophysics Vision Research 43 2003 1753 1764
20. F. Domini, and C. Caudek 3-D structure perceived from dynamic information: a new theory Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 2003 444 449
21. F. Domini, and C. Caudek Recovering slant and angular velocity from a linear velocity field: Modeling and psychophysics Vision Research 43 2003 1753 1764
22. F. Domini, C. Caudek, and D.R. Proffitt Misperceptions angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the Kinetic Depth Effect Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 1997 1111 1129
23. F. Domini, C. Caudek, and S. Richman Distortions of depth-order relations and parallelism in structure from motion Perception & Psychophysics 60 1998 1164 1174
24. F. Domini, C. Caudek, and P. Skirko Temporal integration of motion and stereo cues to depth Perception & Psychophysics 65 2003 48 57
25. F. Domini, C. Caudek, J. Turner, and A. Favretto Discriminating constant from variable angular velocities in the Kinetic Depth Effect Perception & Psychophysics 60 1998 747 760
26. F. Domini, Q.C. Vong, and C. Caudek Temporal integration in structure from motion Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 2002 816 838
27. F.H. Durgin, D.R. Proffitt, T.J. Olson, and K.S. Reinke Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 1995 679 699
28. M.O. Ernst, and M.S. Banks Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion Nature 415 2002 429 433
29. J.P. Frisby, D. Buckley, and P.A. Duke Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing Perception 25 1996 129 154
30. J.P. Frisby, D. Buckley, K.A. Wishart, J. Porrill, J. Garding, and J.E.W. Mayhew Interaction of stereo and texture cues in the perception of 3-dimensional steps Vision Research 35 1995 1463 1472
31. J. Garding, J. Porrill, J.E.W. Mayhew, and J.P. Frisby Binocular stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations Vision Research 35 1995 703 722
32. S. Gepshtein, and M.S. Banks Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception Current Biology 13 6 2003 483 488
33. A. Glennerster, and S.P. McKee Sensitivity to depth or lateral displacement on a slanted reference plane Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 38 1997 S907
34. A. Glennerster, B.J. Rogers, and M.F. Bradshaw Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task Vision Research 36 1996 3441 3456
35. A. Glennerster, B.J. Rogers, and M.F. Bradshaw Cues to viewing distance for stereoscopic depth constancy Perception 27 1998 1357 1365
36. H. Hecht, A. van Doorn, and J.J. Koenderink Compression of visual space in natural scenes and in their photographic counterparts Perception & Psychophysics 61 1999 1269 1286
37. P.B. Hibbard, and M.F. Bradshaw Isotropic integration of binocular disparity and relative motion in the perception of three-dimensional shape Spatial Vision 15 2002 205 217
38. E.C. Hildreth The measurement of visual motion 1984 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
39. J.M. Hillis, S.J. Watt, M.S. Landy, and M.S. Banks Slant from texture and disparity cues: optional cue combination Journal of Vision 4 2004 1 3
40. M.A. Hogervorst, and R.A. Eagle The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 2000 934 955
41. E.B. Johnston Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis Vision Reseach 31 1991 1351 1360
42. E.B. Johnston, B.G. Cumming, and M.S. Landy Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues Vision Reseach 34 1994 2259 2275
43. B. Julesz Foundations of cyclopean perception 1971 University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
44. D.C. Knill, and J.A. Saunders Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research 43 24 2003 2539 2558
45. J. Koenderink, and A. van Doorn Affine structure from motion Journal of the Optical Society of America A 8 1991 377 385
46. J.J. Koenderink, A.J. van Doorn, A.M. Kappers, and J.T. Todd Pappus in optical space Perception & Psychophysics 64 2002 380 391
47. M.S. Landy, and E. Brenner Motion-disparity interaction and the scaling of stereoscopic disparity L.R. Harris M.R.M. Jenkin Vision and attention 2001 Springer Verlag New York 129 151
48. M.S. Landy, and H. Kojima Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges Journal of the Optical Society of America A 18 2001 2307 2320
49. M.S. Landy, L.T. Maloney, E.B. Johnston, and M.J. Young Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion Vision Research 35 1995 389 412
50. J.S. Lappin, and W.D. Craft Foundations of spatial vision: From retinal images to perceived shapes Psychological Review 107 2000 6 38
51. Lind, M., Bingham, G. P., & Forsell, C. (2002). The illusion of perceived metric 3D structure, infovis. IEEE (p. 51).
52. J.C. Liter, M.L. Braunstein, and D.D. Hoffman Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays Perception 22 1993 1441 1465
53. H.C. Longuet-Higgins A computer algorithm for recovering a scene from two projections Nature 293 1981 133 135
54. H.C. Longuet-Higgins, and K. Prazdny The interpretation of a moving retinal image Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 208 1980 385 397
55. J.M. Loomis, J.A. Da Silva, N. Fujita, and S.S. Fukusima Visual space perception and visually directed action Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 1992 906 921
56. J.M. Loomis, and J.W. Philbeck Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? Perception & Psychophysics 61 1999 397 402
57. S.P. McKee, D.M. Levi, and S.F. Bowne The imprecision of stereopsis Vision Research 30 1990 1763 1779
58. S.P. McKee, L. Welch, D.G. Taylor, and S.F. Bowne Finding the common bond: Stereoacuity and the other hyperacuities Vision Research 30 1990 879 891
59. M. Mon-Williams, J.R. Tresilian, and A. Roberts Vergence provides veridical depth perception from horizontal retinal image disparities Experimental Brain Research 133 2000 407 413
60. J.F. Norman, J.S. Lappin, and H.F. Norman The visual perception of 3D length Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 22 1996 173 186
61. K.N. Ogle Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images Journal of the Optical Society of America 43 1953 907 913
62. R Development Core Team. (2005). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
63. W. Richards Structure from stereo and motion Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 1985 343 349
64. W. Richards, and H. Lieberman Correlation between stereo ability and the recovery of structure from motion American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 62 1985 111 118
65. B.J. Rogers, and M.F. Bradshaw Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis Nature 361 1993 253 255
66. B.J. Rogers, and M.F. Bradshaw Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces Perception 24 1995 155 179
67. Tassinari, H., Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2005). The intrinsic constraint model for stereo-motion integration (submitted).
68. J.S. Tittle, and M.L. Braunstein Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion Perception & Psychophysics 54 1993 157 169
69. J.S. Tittle, J.T. Todd, V.J. Perotti, and J.F. Norman The systematic distortion of perceived 3D structure from motion and binocular stereopsis Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 1995 663 678
70. J.T. Todd, and P. Bressan The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences Perception & Psychophysics 48 1990 419 430
71. J.T. Todd, and J.F. Norman The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? Perception & Psychophysics 65 2003 31 47
72. J.T. Todd, J.S. Tittle, and J.F. Norman Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo Perception 24 1995 75 86
73. W.N. Venables, and B.D. Ripley Modern Applied Statistics with S fourth ed. 2002 Springer
74. H. Wallach, and D.N. O'Connell The kinetic depth effect Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 1953 117 129
75. G. Westheimer, and S.P. McKee Stereoscopic acuity for moving retinal images Journal of the Optical Society of America 68 1978 450 455
76. M. Wexler, F. Panerai, I. Lamouret, and J. Droulez Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects Nature 409 2001 85 88
77. F.A. Wichmann, and N.J. Hill The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling Perception & Psychophysics 63 2001 1314 1329
78. M.J. Young, M.S. Landy, and L.T. Maloney A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues Vision Research 33 1993 2685 2696