Misperceptions of Angular Velocities Influence the Perception of Rigidity in the Kinetic Depth Effect

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1111-1129

  Domini, Fulvio ^a,b   Caudek, Corrado ^a   Proffitt, Dennis R ^b  

^a AREA Science Park ^*  (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NASA CENTER ARC; NASA DISCIPLINE SPACE HUMAN FACTORS; PERCEPTION DISORDER; ROTATION;

NASA CENTER ARC; NASA DISCIPLINE SPACE HUMAN FACTORS;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; ROTATION;

EID: 0031205331     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1111     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bennett, B. M., & Hoffman, D. D. (1985). The computation of structure from fixed axis motion: Non-rigid structures. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 293-300.
2. Bennett, B. M., Hoffman, D. D., Nicola, J. E., & Prakash, C. (1989). Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A6, 1052-1069.
3. Braunstein, M. L. (1972). Perception of rotation in depth: A process model. Psychological Review, 79, 510-524.
4. Braunstein, M. L. (1994). Decoding principles, heuristics and inference in visual perception. In G. Jansson, S. S. Bergstrom, & W. Epstein (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects. (pp. 436-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., & Pollick, F. E. (1990). Discriminating rigid from non-rigid motion: Minimum points and views. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 205-214.
6. Cortese, J. M., & Andersen, G. J. (1991). Recovery of 3-D shape from deforming contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 315-327.
7. Cutting, J. E. (1987). Perception and information. Annual Psychological Review, 38, 61-90.
8. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Gerbino, W. (1995). Perception of surface attitude in structure from motion displays. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36, 1694. (Abstract)
9. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D. (1994). Discriminating rigid from non-rigid motion in the Kinetic Depth Effect. Perception, 23(Suppl.), 56a.
10. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Hildreth, E. C. (1984). The measurement of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Hoffman, D. D. (1982). Inferring local surface orientation from motion fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A72, 888-892.
13. Hoffman, D. D., & Bennett, B. M. (1985). Inferring the relative 3-D positions of two moving points. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A2, 350-353.
14. Hoffman, D. D., & Bennett, B. M. (1986). The computation of structure from fixed-axis motion: Rigid structures. Biological Cybernetics, 54, 71-83.
15. Hoffman, D. D., & Flinchbaugh, B. E. (1982). The interpretation of biological motion. Biological Cybernetics, 42, 195-204.
16. Huang, T., & Lee, C. (1989). Motion and structure from orthographic projections. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 536-540.
17. Johansson, G. (1978). About the geometry underlying spontaneous visual decoding of the optical message. In E. Leeuwenberg & H. Buffart, Formal theories of visual perception (pp. 265-276). Chichester, England: Wiley.
18. Koenderink, J. J. (1986). Optic flow. Vision Research, 26, 161-180.
19. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1975). Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22, 773-791.
20. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1976). Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A66, 717-723.
21. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1977). How an ambulant observer can construct a model of the environment from the geometrical structure of the visual flow. In G. Hauske & F. Butenand (Eds.), Kibernetik (pp. 224-247). Munich, Germany: Oldenberg.
22. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1981). Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A71, 953-957.
23. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1986). Depth and shape from differential perspective in the presence of bending deformations. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A3, 242-249.
24. Koenderink, J. J., & Van Doorn, A. J. (1991). Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A8, 377-385.
25. Liter, C. J., Braunstein, M. L., & Hoffman, D. D. (1994). Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays. Perception, 22, 1441-1465.
26. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1982). The role of vertical dimension in stereoscopic vision. Perception, 11, 377-386.
27. Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Prazdny, K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 208, 385-397.
28. Marascuilo, L. A. (1970). Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika, 35, 237-243.
29. Musatti, C. L. (1924). Sui fenomeni stereocinetici [On stereokinetic phenomena]. Archivio Italiano di Psicologia, 6, 205-219.
30. Norman, J. F., & Todd, J. T. (1992). The visual perception of 3-D dimensional form. In G. A. Carpenter & S. Grossberg (Eds.), Neural networks for vision and image processing (pp. 93-110), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Norman, J. F., & Todd, J. T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotary objects undergoing affine stretching transformations. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 279-291.
32. Pollick, F. E. (1989). Shape perception from dynamic occluding contours. Investigative Ophalmology & Visual Science, 30(Suppl. 3), 251.
33. Prazdny, K. (1980). Egomotion and relative depth map from optical flow. Biological Cybernetics, 36, 87-102.
34. Sperling, G., Landy, M. S., Dosher, B. A., & Perkins, M. E. (1989). Kinetic depth effect and identification of shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 826-840.
35. Todd, J. T., & Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419-430.
36. Todorovic, D. (1993). Analysis of two- and three-dimensional rigid and non-rigid motions in the stereokinetic effect. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A10, 804-826.
37. Ullman, S. (1977). The interpretation of visual motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
38. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Ullman, S. (1983). The interpretation of structure from motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 203, 405-426.
40. Ullman, S. (1984). Rigidity and misperceived motion. Perception, 13, 219-220.
41. Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205-217.
42. Waxman, A., & Wohn, K. (1987). Contour evolution, neighbourhood def, and image flow: Textured surfaces in motion. In W. Richards & S. Ullman (Eds.), Image understanding 1985-86 (pp. 72-98). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Zanforlin, M. (1988). The height of a stereokinetic cone: A quantitative determination of a 3-D effect from 2-D moving patterns without a "rigidity assumption." Psychological Research, 50, 162-172.