MRI of the colon

Imaging in Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 195-209

  Van Der Paardt, Marije P ^a   Zijta, Frank M ^b   Stoker, Jaap ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

3 T MRI; acute abdominal pain; colorectal cancer screening; diffusion weighted imaging; inflammatory bowel disease; magnetic resonance colonography

Indexed keywords

SPASMOLYTIC AGENT;

ACUTE ABDOMEN; ANORECTAL DISEASE; CANCER SCREENING; COLON; COLON DILATATION; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CROHN DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE PREPARATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

EID: 77954112122     PISSN: 17555191     EISSN: 17555205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/iim.10.12     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Beets-Tan RGH: MRI of the rectum. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Stoker J (Ed.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 205-227 (2010).
2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al.: Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134(5), 1570-1595 (2008). (Pubitemid 351615355)
3. Lieberman D: Colon cancer screening and surveillance controversies. Gastroenterology 25, 422-427 (2009).
4. Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P: Patient factors infuencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig. Liver Dis. 37(2), 113-118 (2005).
5. Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbick E, Williams CB, Epstein O: A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53(2), 277-283 (2004).
6. Sarwar S, Anwar MM, Ryan B, O'Morain C: Colonoscopy completion rates-are we prepared for a national screening programme? Ir. Med. J. 100(9), 585-587 (2007).
7. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E et al.: Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 355(18), 1863-1872 (2006).
8. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA et al.: CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-ana lysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237(3), 893-904 (2005).
9. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY et al.: Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 359(12), 1207-1217 (2008).
10. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA: Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129(1), 328-337 (2005).
11. Liedenbaum MH, Venema HW, Stoker J: Radiation dose in CT colonography-trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols. Eur. Radiol. 18(10), 2222-2230 (2008).
12. Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, Bosk S, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF: MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 177(4), 823-827 (2001).
13. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, Fried M, Krestin GP, Debatin JF: Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349(9061), 1288-1291 (1997).
14. van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J et al.: CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology 233(2), 328-337, (2004).
15. Florie J, Birnie E, van Gelder RE et al.: MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy. Radiology 245(1), 150-159 (2007). (Pubitemid 47417798)
16. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al.: CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236, 3-9 (2005).
17. Yusuf E, Florie J, Nio CY et al.: Incidental extracolonic fndings on bright lumen MR colonography in a population at increased risk for colorectal carcinoma. Eur. J. Radiol. (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
18. Zijta FM, Bipat S, Stoker J: Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies. Eur. Radiol. (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
19. Iafrate F, Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ et al.: Portrait of a polyp: the CTC dilemma. Abdom. Imaging 35(1), 49-54 (2008).
20. Goldstein NS, Bhanot P, Odish E, Hunter S: Hyperplastic-like colon polyps that preceded microsatellite-unstable adenocarcinomas. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 119(6), 778-796 (2003).
21. Lauenstein TC, Saar B, Martin DR: MR colonography: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 15(3), 395-402, vii (2007).
22. Kinner S, Lauenstein TC: MRI of the colon (MR-colonography): technique. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Stoker J (Ed.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 173-184 (2010).
23. Rex DK: Dosing considerations in the use of sodium phosphate bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Ann. Pharmacother 41(9), 1466-1475 (2007).
24. Jensch S, Bipat S, Peringa J et al.: CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation. Eur. Radiol. 20(1), 146-156 (2010).
25. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF: MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 223 (1), 248-254 (2002).
26. Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A et al.: Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom. Imaging 30(5), 576-583 (2005).
27. Kinner S, Kuehle CA, Langhorst J et al.: MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population. Eur. Radiol. 17(9), 2286-2293 (2007).
28. Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, Ladd SC et al.: Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. Gut 56(8), 1079-1085 (2007).
29. Achiam MP, Chabanova E, Løgager VB, Andersen LP, Thomsen HS, Rosenberg J: MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil. Acad. Radiol. 15(5), 576-583 (2008).
30. Achiam MP, Logager VB, Chabanova E, Eegholm B, Thomsen HS, Rosenberg J: Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging. Abdom. Imaging 34(4), 483-490 (2009).
31. Florie J, van Gelder RE, Haberkorn B et al.: Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 25(4), 766-774 (2007).
32. Florie J, Jensch S, Nievelstein RA et al.: MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Radiology 243(1), 122-131 (2007).
33. Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Ruckert JC et al.: Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 236(1), 184-188 (2005).
34. Kinner S, Lauenstein TC: MR colonography. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 45(2), 377-387 (2007).
35. Ajaj WM, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G et al.: Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of infammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the infammatory activity. Gut 54(2), 257-263 (2005).
36. Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, Goehde SC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG: Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Rofo 173(9), 785-789 (2001).
37. Lauenstein TC, Ajaj W, Kuehle CA, Goehde SC, Schlosser T W, Ruehm SG: Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience. Invest. Radiol. 40(2), 89-96 (2005).
38. 2 enema-pilot study. Radiology 219(2), 558-562 (2001).
39. Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, Marquesuzaa H, Rosenberg S, Edelmann RR: MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 176(1), 144-146 (2001).
40. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, Goehde SC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG: MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention? J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 19(2), 216-221 (2004).
41. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried M, Debatin JF: Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216(2), 383-388 (2000).
42. Lam W W, Leung WK, Wu JK, So NM, Sung JJ: Screening of colonic tumors by air-infated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 19(4), 447-452 (2004).
43. Leung WK, Lam WW, Wu JC et al.: Magnetic resonance colonography in the detection of colonic neoplasm in high-risk and average-risk individuals. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 99(1), 102-108 (2004).
44. 2 delivery system. Gastrointest. Endosc. 56(2), 190-194 (2002).
45. Saar B, Meining A, Beer A et al.: Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Br. J. Radiol. 80(952), 235-241 (2007).
46. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM et al.: Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 119(2), 300-304 (2000).
47. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Raptopoulos V: CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur. Radiol. 12(3), 525-530 (2002).
48. Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, Kadell BM: CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 172(3), 595-599 (1999).
49. Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D et al.: Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 238(1), 143-149 (2006).
50. Kerker J, Albes G, Roer N, Montag M, Budde T, Schaefer A: MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity. Z. Gastroenterol. 46(4), 339-343 (2008).
51. Saar B, Gschossmann JM, Bonel HM, Kickuth R, Vock P, Netzer P: Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality. Invest. Radiol. 43(8), 580-586 (2008).
52. Luboldt W, Steiner P, Bauerfeind P, Pelkonen P, Debatin JF: Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology 207(1), 59-65 (1998).
53. Ajaj WM, Ruehm SG, Ladd SC, Gerken G, Goyen M: Utility of dark-lumen MR colonography for the assessment of extra-colonic organs. Eur. Radiol. 17, 1574-1583 (2007).
54. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ, Stoker J: Infammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-ana lysis of prospective studies. Radiology 247(1), 64-79 (2008).
55. Desmond AN, O'Regan K, Curran C et al.: Crohn's disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation. Gut 57(11), 1524-1529 (2008).
56. Ripollés T, Martínez MJ, Paredes JM, Blanc E, Flors L, Delgado F: Crohn disease: correlation of fndings at contrast-enhanced US with severity at endoscopy. Radiology 253(1), 241-248 (2009).
57. Shoenut JP, Semelka RC, Magro CM, Silverman R, Yaffe CS, Micfikier AB: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy in distinguishing the type and severity of infammatory bowel disease. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 19(1), 31-35 (1994).
58. Florie J, Horsthuis K, Hommes DW et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging compared with ileocolonoscopy in evaluating disease severity in Crohn's disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3(12), 1221-1228 (2005).
59. Durno CA, Sherman P, Williams T, Shuckett B, Dupuis A, Griffths AM: Magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish the type and severity of pediatric infammatory bowel diseases. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 30(2), 170-174 (2000).
60. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ et al.: MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 177(6), 1325-1332 (2001).
61. Wiarda BM, Horsthuis K, Dobben AC et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel with the true FISP sequence: intra-and interobserver agreement of enteroclysis and imaging without contrast material. Clin. Imaging 33(4), 267-273 (2009).
62. Zijta F, Stoker J: Magnetic resonance imaging of the colon (colonography): results. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Stoker J (Ed.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 185-204 (2010).
63. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PC, Stoker J: Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease: a systematic review. Eur. Radiol. 19(6), 1450-1460 (2009).
64. Schreyer AG, Golder S, Scheibl K et al.: Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: frst clinical experience. Infamm. Bowel Dis. 11(4), 388-394 (2005).
65. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R et al.: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal infammation in patients with infammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 54(2), 250-256 (2005).
66. Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M, Bainbridge A et al.: Mural infammation in Crohn disease: location-matched histologic validation of MR imaging features. Radiology 252(3), 712-720 (2009).
67. Langhorst J, Kuhle CA, Ajaj W et al.: MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of infammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance. Infamm. Bowel Dis. 13(8), 1001-1008 (2007).
68. Röttgen R, Herzog H, Lopez-Haninnen E, Felix R: Bowel wall enhancement in magnetic resonance colonography for assessing activity in Crohn's disease. Clin. Imaging 30(1), 27-31 (2006).
69. Ergen FB, Akata D, Hayran M et al.: Magnetic resonance colonography for the evaluation of colonic infammatory bowel disease: correlation with conventional colonoscopy. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 32(6), 848-854 (2008).
70. Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia-Bosch O et al.: Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Gut 58(8), 1113-1120 (2009).
71. Stoker J, van Ran den A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA: Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology 253(1), 31-46 (2009).
72. Laméris W, van Ran den A, van Es HW et al.: Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ 338, b2431 (2009).
73. van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH et al.: Acute appendicitis: meta-ana lysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 249(1), 97-106 (2008).
74. Laméris W, van Randen A, Bipat S et al.: Graded compression ultrasonography and computed tomography in acute colonic diverticulitis: meta-ana lysis of test accuracy. Eur. Radiol. 18(11), 2498-2511 (2008).
75. Birchard KR, Brown MA, Hyslop WB, Firat Z, Semelka RC: MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 184(2), 452-458 (2005).
76. Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J: MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 183(3), 671-675 (2004).
77. Israel GM, Malguria N, McCarthy S, Copel J, Weinreb J: MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 28(2), 428-433 (2008).
78. Oto A, Ernst RD, Shah R et al.: Right-lower-quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis in pregnant women: evaluation with MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 234(2), 445-451 (2005).
79. Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV, Goldsmith JD, Rofsky NM: Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 250(3), 749-757 (2009).
80. Basaran A, Basaran M: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 64(7), 481-488 (2009).
81. Oto A, Srinivasan PN, Ernst RD et al.: Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 186(3), 883-887 (2006).
82. Vu L, Ambrose D, Vos P, Tiwari P, Rosengarten M, Wiseman S: Evaluation of MRI for the diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy when ultrasound is inconclusive. J. Surg. Res. 156(1), 145-149 (2009).
83. Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y: Acute appendicitis in pregnancy-risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int. J. Surg. 5(3), 192-197 (2007).
84. Cobben L, Groot I, Kingma L, Coerkamp E, Puylaert J, Blickman J: A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy. Eur. Radiol. 19(5), 1175-1183 (2009).
85. Heverhagen JT, Sitter H, Zielke A, Klose KJ: Prospective evaluation of the value of magnetic resonance imaging in suspected acute sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis. Colon Rectum. 51(12), 1810-1815 (2008).
86. Stoker J: Magnetic resonance imaging and the acute abdomen. Br. J. Surg. 95(10), 1193-1194 (2008).
87. Barth MM, Smith MP, Pedrosa I, Lenkinski RE, Rofsky NM: Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. Radiographics 27, 1445-1464 (2007).
88. Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia-Bosch O et al.: Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of infammatory bowel disease. Radiographics 29(3), 701-719 (2009).
89. Nederveen AJ, Gonçalves SI: Imaging of the gastrointestinal tract at high-feld strength. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Stoker J (Ed.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 21-32 (2010).
90. Thornton E, Morrin MM, Yee J: Current status of MR colonography. Radiographics 30(1), 201-218 (2010).
91. Rottgen R, Herzog H, Bogen P, Freund T, Felix R, Bruhn H: MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model. Clin. Imaging 30(4), 248-253 (2006).
92. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Borchert A et al.: Detection of colorectal polyps: comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom. Radiology 241(1), 125-131 (2006).
93. Koh DM, Collins DJ: Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 188(6), 1622-1635 (2007).
94. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al.: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11(2), 102-125 (2009).
95. Goh V, Taylor NJ: Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Stoker J (Ed.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 51-64 (2010).
96. 2-weighted imaging for rectal cancer detection. Eur. J. Radiol. 65(2), 299-303 (2008).
97. Hosonuma T, Tozaki M, Ichiba N et al.: Clinical usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging using low and high b-values to detect rectal cancer. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 5(4), 173-177 (2006).
98. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Motosugi U et al.: High-B-value diffusion-weighted MRI in colorectal cancer. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 187(1), 181-184 (2006).
99. Kiryu S, Dodanuki K, Takao H et al.: Free-breathing diffusion-weighted imaging for the assessment of infammatory activity in Crohn's disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 29(4), 880-886 (2009).
100. Weishaupt D, Patak MA, Froehlich J, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF: Faecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography. Lancet 354(9181), 835-836 (1999).