MR-colonopraphy in hospitalized patients: Feasibility and sensitivity;MR-kolonografie bei stationären patienten: Durchführbarkeit und sensitivität

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 339-343

  Kerker, Jens ^a   Albes, C ^a   Roer, N ^a   Montag, M ^a   Budde, T ^a   Schaefer, A ^a  

^a ALFRIED KRUPP KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Detection of polyps; MR colonography; Virtual coloscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; POLYP; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; AGED; COLON POLYP; COLON TUMOR; COLONOSCOPY; EVALUATION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ENEMA; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; WATER;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ENEMA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WATER;

EID: 45149100250     PISSN: 00442771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963774     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 2003; 52: 1738-1743
2. Ajaj W, Rühm SG, Papanikolaou N et al. Dunkellumen-MR- Kolonographie: Kann hochaufgelöste VIBE-Sequenz die Detektion von kolorektalen Läsionen verbessern? (Dark Lumen MR Colonography: Can High Spatial Resolution VIBE Imaging Improve the Detection of Colorectal Masses? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 1073-1078
3. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA - the journal of the American Medical Association 2004; 291 (14): 1713-1719
4. Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR-colonography versus conventional coloscopy. Radiology 2006; 238 (1): 143-149
5. Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA et al. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 688-695
6. Knöpnadel J, Altenhofen L, Lichtner F et al. Früherkennung des Darmkrebses und möglicher Vorstufen. Wissenschaftliche Reihe - Band 59. Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, 2005
7. Lauenstein TC. MR colonography: current status. European Radiology 2006; 16 (7): 1519-1526
8. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S et al. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 2000; 216 (2): 383-388
9. Luboldt W, Steiner P, Bauerfeind P et al. Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology 1998; 207: 59-65
10. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus convetional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000; 119: 300-304
11. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191-2200
12. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000; 355: 1211-1214
13. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB et al. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. American journal of roentgenology 2003; 181 (6): 1593-1598
14. Tsuda S, Veress B, Tóth E et al. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 2002; 51 (4): 550-555
15. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219: 685-692