Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: First clinical experience

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 388-394

  Schreyer, Andreas G ^a   Gölder, Stefan ^a   Scheibl, Karl ^a   Völk, Markus ^a   Lenhart, Markus ^a   Timmer, Antje ^a   Schölmerich, Jürgen ^a   Feuerbach, Stefan ^a   Rogler, Gerhard ^a   Herfarth, Hans ^a   Seitz, Johannes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Colonography; Colonoscopy; Crohn's disease; Enteroclysis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Small bowel

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLON STENOSIS; COLON SURGERY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROHN DISEASE; DARK LUMEN MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENTEROCLYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FECES; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING COLONOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COLON; CONTRAST MEDIA; CROHN DISEASE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTESTINE, SMALL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 20244384425     PISSN: 10780998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000164022.72729.06     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Richer A, Wruk D, Potthast S, et al. Diagnostic imaging in Crohn's disease: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional imaging methods. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15:176-181.
2. Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, et al. Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10:45-54.
3. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD. Enteroclysis or small bowel follow-through in Crohn's diseases? Gastroenterology. 1998;114:1349-1351.
4. Kerber E, Wolf E, Johnes B, et al. CT evaluation of Crohn's disease: effect on patient management. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:537-540.
5. Thoeni R, Gould R. Enteroclysis and small bowel series: comparison of radiation dose and examination time. Radiology. 1991;178:659-662.
6. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1496-1503.
7. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191-2200.
8. Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, et al. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 2001;173:785-789.
9. Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut. 2003;52:1738-1743.
10. Snow C. One-stop shopping. Mod Healthc. 1996;26:32-37.
11. Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2:491-497.
12. Hassan C, Cerro P, Zullo A, et al. Computed tomography enteroclysis in comparison with ileoseopy in patients with Crohn's disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;18:121-125.
13. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut. 2005;54:250-256.
14. Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy-feasibility study. Radiology. 2003; 229:275-281.
15. Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S, et al. Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1535-1542.
16. Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1410-1415.
17. Akerkar GA, Yee J, Hung R, et al. Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: A comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54: 310-315.
18. Angtuaco TL, Banaad-Omiotek GD, Howden CW. Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:887-893.
19. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology. 2003;227:378-384.
20. Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, et al. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:578-585.
21. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002;222:337-345.
22. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:1325-1332.
23. Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P, et al. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn's disease. Gut. 2003;52:393-397.
24. Gasche C, Scholmerich J, Brynskov J, et al. A simple classification of Crohn's disease: report of the Working Party for the World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna 1998. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2000;6:8-15.