Detection of colorectal polyps: Comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom

Radiology

Volumn 241, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 125-131

  Wessling, Johannes ^a   Fischbach, Roman ^a   Borchert, Alexandra ^a   Kugel, Harald ^a   Allkemper, Thomas ^a   Osada, Nani ^a   Heindel, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE COLONOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RECTUM POLYP; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33748921885     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2411050292     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colonic endolaminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119:300-304.
2. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried M, Debatin JF. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 2000;216:383-388.
3. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS. CT colonography: single-versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001;219:461-465.
4. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 2004;230:629-636.
5. Lauepstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, Gohde SC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Dark lumen MRI-colonography: initial experience. Rofo 2001;173:785-789.
6. Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA, Coban RH. Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:847-849.
7. Prince MR, Arnolds C, Frisoli JK. Neprhotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:162-166.
8. In den Kleef JJ, Cappen JJ. RLSQ: T1, T2, and rho calculations, combining ratios and least squares. Magn Reson Med 1987;5:513-524.
9. Wessling J, Fischhach R, Meier N, et al. CT colonography: protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT-study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiologogy 2003;228:753-759.
10. Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J, Wright G, Britain J, Beaulieu G. Muscoloskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:343-351.
11. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I. et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-2200.
12. Lauenstein TC, Gouhde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF. MRI colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002;223:248-254.
13. Laboldt W, Morrin M. MRI colonography: status and perspective. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:400-409.
14. Morrin MM, Hochmann MF, Farrell RJ, Marquesuzaa H, Rosenberg S, Edelmann RR. MRI colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:144-146.
15. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, Goehde SC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. MRI colonography how does air compare to water for colonic distention? J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:216-221.
16. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2003;229:775-781.
17. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 2000;217:765-771.