MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: Diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1001-1008

  Langhorst, Jost ^a,e   Kühle, Christiane A ^b   Ajaj, Waleed ^c   Nufer, Michael ^b   Barkhausen, Jörg ^b   Michalsen, Andreas ^a   Dobos, Gustav J ^a   Lauenstein, Thomas C ^b,d  

^a KLINIKEN ESSEN MITTE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^d EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Diagnostic accuracy; Inflammatory bowel diseases; MR colonography; Patient acceptance

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROHN DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; COLONOSCOPY; CROHN DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PILOT PROJECTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34548171207     PISSN: 10780998     EISSN: 15364844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20140     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kiesslich R, Jung M, Galle PR, Neurath MF. Ulcerative colitis - how can endoscopic observation be improved? Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003;128:139-141.
2. Fiocca R, Ceppa P. The diagnostic reliability of endoscopic biopsies in diagnosis colitis. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:321-322.
3. Nahon S, Bouhnik Y, Lavergne-Slove A, et al. Colonoscopy accurately predicts the anatomical severity of colonic Crohn's disease attacks: correlation with findings from colectomy specimens. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;12:3102-3107.
4. Eckardt VF, Gaedertz C, Eidner C. Colonic perforation with endoscopic biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;6:560-562.
5. Cappell MS, Friedel D. The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: endoscopic findings, therapy, and complications. Med Clin North Am. 2002;6:1253-1288.
6. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Copel L, Raptopoulos V, Kruskal JB. Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): update on technique, applications, and future developments. Surg Technol Int. 2003;11:102-110.
7. Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;3:578-785.
8. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002;2:337-345.
9. Thoeni RF, Gould RG. Enteroclysis and small bowel series: comparison of radiation dose and examination time. Radiology. 1991;3:659-662.
10. Chernish SM, Maglinte DD, O'Connor K. Evaluation of the small intestine by enteroclysis for Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992; 6:696-701.
11. Arndt JW, Grootscholten MI, van Hogezand RA, Griffioen G, Lamers CB, Pauwels EK. Inflammatory bowel disease activity assessment using technetium-99m-HMPAO leukocytes. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;2: 387-393.
12. Charron M, Orenstein SR, Bhargava S. Detection of inflammatory bowel disease in pediatric patients with technetium-99m-HMPAO-labeled leukocytes. J Nucl Med. 1994;3:451-455.
13. Bitterling H, Rock C, Reiser M. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease - methodology of MSCT and clinical results. Radiologe. 2003;1:17-25.
14. Wiesner W, Steinbrich W. Imaging diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Ther Umsch. 2003;3:137-144.
15. Jamieson DH, Shipman PJ, Israel DM, Jacobson K. Comparison of multidetector CT and barium studies of the small bowel: inflammatory bowel disease in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;5:1211-1216.
16. Alves A, Panis Y, Bouhnik Y, Maylin V, Lavergne-Slove A, Valleur P. Subtotal colectomy for severe acute colitis: a 20-year experience of a tertiary care center with an aggressive and early surgical policy. Am Coll Surg. 2003;3:379-385.
17. Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori H, Okabayashi K, Hibi T, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease. Br J Surg. 2003;8:970-973.
18. Ajaj W. Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut. 2005;54:181-182.
19. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R. et al. Comparison of magneticresonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut. 2005;54:257-263.
20. Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1410-1415.
21. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002;222:337-345.
22. Van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J, et al. CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology. 2004;233:328-337.
23. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology. 2003;227:378-384.
24. Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, et al. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonography, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:578-585.
25. Juchems MS, Ehmann J, Brambs HJ, et al. A retrospective evaluation of patient acceptance of computed tomography colonography ("virtual colonoscopy") in comparison with conventional colonoscopy in an average risk screening population. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:664-670.
26. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, et al. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2002; 223:248-254.
27. Kuehle CA, Ajaj W, Joeckel M, et al. MR colonography -preliminary results of a new fecal tagging concept avoiding bowel cleansing. ISMRM 2005, Proc Int Soc Magn Res Med. 2005;13.
28. Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2001;48:526-535.
29. Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P. Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37: 113-118.
30. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH, Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Johnston TK. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:307-314.
31. Damore LJ, Rantis PC, Vernava AM, Longo WE. Colonoscopic perforations. Etiology, diagnosis, and management. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39:1308-1314.
32. Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology. 2002;223:615-619.
33. Motrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, et al. Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:913-918.
34. Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, et al. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173:561-564.
35. Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P Herman M, et al. CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1192-1202.
36. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Radiology. 2005;234:452-459.
37. Koelbel G, Schmiedl U, Majer MC, et al. Diagnosis of fistulas and sinus tracts in patients with Crohn's disease: value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:999-1003.
38. Hussain SM, Outwater EK, Joekes EC, et al. Clinical and MR imaging features of cryptoglandular and Crohn's fistulas and abscesses. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:67-74.
39. Bell SJ, Halligan S, Windsor AC, et al. Response of fistulating Crohn's disease to infliximab treatment assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:387-393.
40. Schreyer AG, Golder S, Scheibl K, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: first clinical experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:388-394.
41. Wardle J, Sutton S, Williamson S, et al. Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening. Prev Med. 2000;31:323-334.
42. Akerkar GA, Yee J, Hung R, et al. Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:310-315.
43. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, et al. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:913-921.
44. Kinner S, Kuehle CA, Nuefer M, et al. MR colonography vs. conventional colonoscopy: comparison of patient acceptance in a screening population. ESGAR/SGR 2006.
45. Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, et al. MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology. 2006;238:517-530.
46. Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, et al. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:576-583.
47. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, et al. Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology. 2003;229:99-108.