MR Colonography: 1.5T versus 3T

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 395-402

  Lauenstein, Thomas C ^a   Saar, Bettina ^b   Martin, Diego R ^a  

^a EMORY CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COLON DISEASE; COLON POLYP; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE COLONOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; RADIATION PHYSICS; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ARTIFACTS; CATHARTICS; COLONIC DISEASES; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 34548712894     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.06.006     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Luboldt W., Bauerfeind P., Steiner P., et al. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349 (1997) 1288-1291
2. Luboldt W., Frohlich J.M., Schneider N., et al. MR colonography: optimized enema composition. Radiology 212 (1999) 265-269
3. Bielen D.J., Bosmans H.T., De Wever L.L., et al. Clinical validation of high-resolution fast spin-echo MR colonography after colon distention with air. J Magn Reson Imaging 22 (2005) 400-405
4. Ajaj W., Lauenstein T.C., Pelster G., et al. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?. J Magn Reson Imaging 19 (2004) 216-221
5. Lomas D.J., Sood R.R., Graves M.J., et al. Colon carcinoma: MR imaging with CO2 enema-pilot study. Radiology 219 (2001) 558-562
6. Royster A.P., Fenlon H.M., Clarke P.D., et al. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 (1997) 1237-1242
7. Geenen R.W., Hussain S.M., Cademartiri F., et al. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection. Radiographics 24 (2004) e18
8. Ajaj W., Lauenstein T.C., Pelster G., et al. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 234 (2005) 452-459
9. Hartmann D., Bassler B., Schilling D., et al. Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: magnetic resonance colonography in the evaluation of the proximal colon. Endoscopy 37 (2005) 816-820
10. Ajaj W., Pelster G., Treichel U., et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 52 (2003) 1738-1743
11. Svensson M.H., Svensson E., Lasson A., et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222 (2002) 337-345
12. Kinner S., Kuehle C.A., Langhorst J., et al. MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population. Eur Radiol (2007) [Epub ahead of print]
13. Saar B., Heverhagen J.T., Obst T., et al. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 35 (2000) 521-526
14. Kuehle C.A., Langhorst J., Ladd S.C., et al. MR colonography without bowel cleansing-a prospectivecross-sectional study in a screening population. Gut 56 (2007) 1079-1085
15. Lauenstein T.C., Ajaj W., Kuehle C.A., et al. Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol 40 (2005) 89-96
16. Lauenstein T.C., Goehde S.C., and Debatin J.F. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing. Abdom Imaging 27 (2002) 410-417
17. Rottgen R., Herzog H., Bogen P., et al. MR colonoscopy at 3.0T: comparison with 1.5T in vivo and a colon model. Clin Imaging 30 (2006) 248-253
18. Wessling J., Fischbach R., Borchert A., et al. Detection of colorectal polyps: comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom. Radiology 241 (2006) 125-131
19. Florie J., Jensch S., Nievelstein R.A., et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Radiology 243 (2007) 122-131
20. Papanikolaou N., Grammatikakis J., Maris T., et al. MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences. Eur Radiol 13 (2003) 448-452
21. Lauenstein T., Holtmann G., Schoenfelder D., et al. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 (2001) 823-827
22. Froehlich J.M., Patak M.A., von Weymarn C., et al. Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 21 (2005) 370-375
23. Rogalla P., Lembcke A., Ruckert J.C., et al. Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 236 (2005) 184-188
24. Hussain S.M., Wielopolski P.A., and Martin D.R. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T: problem or a promise for the future?. Top Magn Reson Imaging 16 (2005) 325-335
25. Norris D.G. High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 18 (2003) 519-529
26. Merkle E.M., and Dale B.M. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 1524-1532
27. Merkle E.M., Dale B.M., and Paulson E.K. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 (2006) 17-26
28. Lewin J.S., Duerk J.L., Jain V.R., et al. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166 (1996) 1337-1345
29. Florie J., Wasser M.N., Arts-Cieslik K., et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the bowel wall for assessment of disease activity in Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 1384-1392
30. Maccioni F., Bruni A., Viscido A., et al. MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 238 (2006) 517-530
31. Hartmann D., Bassler B., Schilling D., et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 238 (2006) 143-149
32. Pappalardo G., Polettini E., Frattaroli F.M., et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 119 (2000) 300-304
33. Martin D.R., Yang M., Thomasson D., et al. MR colonography: development of optimized method with ex vivo and in vivo systems. Radiology 225 (2002) 597-602
34. Saar B., Meining A., Beer A., et al. Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Br J Radiol 80 (2007) 235-241
35. Shin LK, Hargreaves B, Beaulieu C, et al. MR colonography at 3T using 1D- and 2D-accelerated autocalibrated parallel imaging. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM). Berlin, May 2007.
36. Saar B, Gschossmann JM, Stoupis C, et al. Colorectal lesion characterization by using MR-colonography at 3T using dynamic scanning: an initial experience. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology. Heraklion, June 2006.