Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 80, Issue 952, 2007, Pages 235-241

  Saar, Bettina ^a   Meining, A ^b   Beer, A ^b   Settles, M ^b   Helmberger, H ^c   Frimberger, E ^b   Rummeny, E J ^b   Rosch T ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c Krankenhaus Dritter Orden   (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; WATER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE POLYP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPINE POSITION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34347375538     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/83959666     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:15-36.
2. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1781-5.
3. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, Ederer F, Geiser MS, Mongin SJ, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1603-7.
4. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, Levin B, Cohen C, Runowicz CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:8-22.
5. Liebermann DA, Weiss DG. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Engl J Med 2001;345:555-60.
6. Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG, Bond HJ, Ansel H, Waye DJ, et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1766-72.
7. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, Fried M, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 1997;349:1288-91.
8. Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Nunes DP, Ferrucci JT. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1237-42.
9. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, Casciani E, D'Orta C, D'Amato M, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119:300-4.
10. Saar B, Heverhagen JT, Obst T, Berthold LD, Kopp I, Klose KJ, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2000;35:521-6.
11. Lam WW, Leung Wk, Wu JK, So NM, Sung JJ. Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic (MR) colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:447-52.
12. Hoppe H, Netzer P, Spreng A, Quattropani C, Mattich J, Dinkel HP. Comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasm in a single institutional study using second look colonoscopy with discrepant results. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1924-35.
13. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EJ, Clark DW, Helper DJ, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-8.
14. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Bassett P, Vance M, Bartram CI. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:913-21.
15. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 2002;222:337-45.
16. Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, Bosk S, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. MR-colonography without colonic cleansing: A new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:823-7.
17. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF. MR colonography with barium fecal tagging: initial experience. Radiology 2002;223:248-54.
18. Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, Lauenstein T, Kuhle C, Ruehm SG, et al. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:576-83.
19. Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:230-6.
20. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, Holtmann G, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, et al. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2005;234:452-9.
21. Luboldt, W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried, M, Debatin JF. Colonic masses: Detection with MR colonography. Radiology 2000;216:383-8.
22. Atkin WS, Hart A, Edwards R, McIntyre P, Aubrey R, Wardle J, et al. Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. Gut 1998;42:560-5.
23. Aldrige AJ, Simson JN. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size: are polyps less than 10 mm in size important? Eur J Surg 2001;167:777-81.
24. Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU Vogt FM, Gohde SC, Debatin JF, Ruhm SG. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. RoFo 2001;173:785-9.
25. Lauenstein TC, Ajaj W, Kuehle CA, Goehde SC, Schlosser TW, Ruehm SG. Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol 2005;40:89-96.
26. Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, Marquesuzaa H, Rosenberg S, Edelman RR. MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:144-6.
27. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, Goehde SC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention? J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:216-21.
28. Steidle G, Schäfer J, Schlemmer HP, Claussen CD, Schick F. Two dimensional acquisition technique in parallel 3D MR-colonography. RoFo 2004;176:1100-5.