Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 580-586

  Saar, Bettina ^a   Gschossmann, Juergen M ^a   Bonel, Harald M ^a   Kickuth, Ralph ^a   Vock, Peter ^a   Netzer, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b Lindenhofspital   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

3.0 Tesla; Colorectal masses; Colorectal polyps; Conventional colonoscopy; Magnetic resonance colonography; Magnetic resonance tomography

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON; COLON POLYP; COLON TUMOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; COLON; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 49849096095     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e9af1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology. 2000;216:383-388.
2. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology. 2000;l 19:300-304.
3. 2 enema-pilot study. Radiology. 2001;219:558-562.
4. Hansmann HJ, Hess T, Hahmann M, et al. MRI in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Fortschr Rontgenstr. 2001;173:4-11.
5. Saar B, Heverhagen JT, Obst T, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:521-526.
6. Lomas DJ. Technical developments in bowel MRI. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13:1058-1071.
7. Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, et al. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Fortschr Roentgenstr. 2001;173:785-789.
8. Herborn CU, Yang F, Robert P, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography in a rodent polyp model. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:723-727.
9. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. How does air compares to water for colon distension. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:216-221.
10. Edelstein WA, Glover GH, Hardy J, et al. The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1986;3:604-618.
11. Moser E, Trattnig S. 3.0 Tesla MR Systems. Invest Radiol. 2003;38: 375-376.
12. Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:385-402.
13. Bernstein MA, Huston J III, Lin C, et al. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3T: technical considerations ad initial experience. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:955-962.
14. Bolog N, Nanz D, Weishaupt D. Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1298-1307.
15. Merkle EM, Dale BM. The basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1524-1532.
16. Rottgen R, Herzog H, Bogen P, et al. MR-colonoscopy at 3 T: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model. Clin Imaging. 2006;30:248-253.
17. Ardekani S, Selva L, Sayre J, et al. Quantitative metrics for evaluating parallel acquisitions techniques in diffusing tensor imaging at 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:806-814.
18. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocali-brating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202-1210.
19. Ajaj W, Ruhm SG, Papanikolaou N, et al. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve detection of colorectal masses? Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2006;178:1073-1078.
20. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, et al. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2002; 223:248-254.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. The Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170.
22. Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut. 2003;52:1738-1743.
23. Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology. 2006;238:143-149.
24. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Falkenhausen M, et al. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Fortschr Roentgenstr 2004; 176:21-26.
25. Saar B, Meining A, Beer A, et al. Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:235-41.
26. Hussain SM, Wielpolski PA, Martin DR. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T: problem or promise for the future? Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;16:325-335.
27. Schindera S, Nelson RC, DeLong DM, et al. Multi detector row CT of the small bowel: peak enhancement temporal window-initial experience. Radiology. 2007;243:438-444.
28. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24-28.
29. Hoppe H, Netzer P, Spreng A, et al. Prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced CT colonography for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1924-1935.
30. Ajaj W, Ruehm SG, Gerken G, et al. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:1088-94.
31. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:575-579.
32. Steidle G, Schafer J, Schlemmer HP, et al. Two dimensional acquisition technique in parallel 3D MR-colonography. Fortschr Roentgenstr. 2004; 176:1100-1105.
33. Collins CM, Liu W, Schreiber W, et al. Central brightening due to constructive interference with, without and despite dielectric resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 ;21:192-196.
34. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York, NY: Wiley; 1999; 10:662.