Current status of MR colonography

Radiographics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 201-218

  Thornton, Eavan ^a   Morrin, Martina M ^a   Yee, Judy ^b  

^a BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL TUMOR; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 77950116612     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.301095519     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts and figures: special edition. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society, 2008.
2. Morson BC. The evolution of colorectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1984;35(6):425-431.
3. Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Waye JD, et al. Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ 1990; 68(6):789-795.
4. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329(27):1977-1981.
5. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Screening for colorectal cancer: United States, 1997. JAMA 1999;281(17):1581-1582.
6. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359(12): 1207-1217.
7. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, Fried M, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 1997;349(9061): 1288-1291.
8. Liedenbaum MH, Venema HW, Stoker J. Radiation dose in CT colonography: trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols. Eur Radiol 2008;18(10):2222-2230.
9. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Exposure of the population in the United States, and Canada from natural background radiation. NRCP Report 94. Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1988.
10. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA. Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 2005;129(1): 328-337.
11. Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Vanness DJ, et al. Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact. Radiology 2008;249(1):151-159.
12. Elwood JM, Ali G, Schlup MM, et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy for colorectal screening: a randomized trial of performance and acceptability. Cancer Detect Prev 1995;19(4):337-347.
13. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002;223(1):248-254.
14. Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, et al. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging 2005;30(5):576-583.
15. Rodríguez-Gomez S, Pagés Llinas M, Castells Garangou A, et al. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms. Eur Radiol 2008;18(7):1396-1405.
16. Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, Ladd SC, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. Gut 2007;56(8):1079-1085.
17. Kinner S, Lauenstein TC. MR colonography. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45(2):377-387.
18. Geenen RW, Hussain SM, Cademartiri F, Poley JW, Siersema PD, Krestin GP. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection. RadioGraphics 2004;24 (1):e18.
19. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol 2002;12(3): 525-530.
20. Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Rückert JC, et al. Spasmolysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology 2005;236(1):184-188.
21. Lomas DJ, Sood RR, Graves MJ, Miller R, Hall NR, Dixon AK. Colon carcinoma: MR imaging with CO2 enema-pilot study. Radiology 2001;219(2): 558-562.
22. Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ. Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges- update 2002. Eur Radiol 2002;12(3):502-524.
23. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried M, Debatin JF. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 2000;216(2): 383-388.
24. Lauenstein TC, Debatin JF. Magnetic resonance colonography for colorectal cancer screening. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001;22(5):443-453.
25. Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC. Virtual magnetic resonance colonography. Gut 2003;52(suppl 4):iv7-iv22.
26. Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, Marquesuzaa H, Rosenberg S, Edelman RR. MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176(1):144-146.
27. Zhang S, Peng JW, Shi QY, Tang F, Zhong MG. Colorectal neoplasm: magnetic resonance colonography with fat enema-initial clinical experience. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13(40):5371-5375.
28. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, Goehde SC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention? J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19(2):216-221.
29. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 2000;217(3):765-771.
30. Ajaj W, Ruehm SG, Ladd SC, Gerken G, Goyen M. Utility of dark-lumen MR colonography for the assessment of extra-colonic organs. Eur Radiol 2007; 17(6):1574-1583.
31. Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Kagan A, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after gadopentetate dimeglumine exposure: case series of 36 patients. Radiology 2009;253(1):81-89.
32. Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Gopal DV. Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2006;130(6):1582-1587.
33. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2005;234(2):452-459.
34. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut 2005;54(2):257-263.
35. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 2005; 54(2):250-256.
36. Ajaj W, Ruehm SG, Lauenstein T, et al. Dark-lumen magnetic resonance colonography in patients with suspected sigmoid diverticulitis: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2005;15(11):2316-2322.
37. Ajaj W, Goyen M, Langhorst J, Ruehm SG, Gerken G, Lauenstein TC. MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomoses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24(1):101-107.
38. Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Haug A, et al. Whole body MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T compared with FDGPET-CT for the detection of tumour recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol 2009;19 (6):1366-1378.
39. Haykir R, Karakose S, Karabacakoglu A, Sahin M, Kayacetin E. Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12(15):2345-2350.
40. Saar B, Rösch T, Rummeny EJ. Colorectal cancer screening: a challenge for magnetic resonance colonography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002;13(6): 427-434.
41. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236(1):3-9.
42. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119(2): 300-304.
43. Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 2003;52(12):1738-1743.
44. Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2006;238(1):143-149.
45. Ajaj W, Ruehm SG, Gerken G, Goyen M. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24(5):1088-1094.
46. Saar B, Gschossmann JM, Bonel HM, Kickuth R, Vock P, Netzer P. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality. Invest Radiol 2008;43(8):580-586.
47. Achiam MP, Logager VB, Chabanova E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging. Abdom Imaging 2009;34(4):483-490.
48. Kerker J, Albes G, Roer N, Montag M, Budde T, Schaefer A. MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity [in German]. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46(4):339-343.
49. Lauenstein TC, Ajaj W, Kuehle CA, Goehde SC, Schlosser TW, Ruehm SG. Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol 2005;40(2):89-96.
50. Röttgen R, Herzog H, Bogen P, Freund T, Felix R, Bruhn H. MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model. Clin Imaging 2006;30(4):248-253.
51. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Borchert A, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps: comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom. Radiology 2006;241(1):125-131.
52. Larkman DJ, Nunes RG. Parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2007;52(7):R15-R55.
53. Morrin MM, Pedrosa I, McKenzie CA, et al. Parallel imaging enhanced MR colonography using a phantom model. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28 (3):664-672.
54. Florie J, Birnie E, van Gelder RE, et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy. Radiology 2007;245(1):150-159.
55. Florie J, Jensch S, Nievelstein RA, et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Radiology 2007;243(1): 122-131.
56. Kinner S, Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, et al. MR colonography with fecal tagging: do individual patient characteristics influence image quality? J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25(5):1007-1012.
57. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking): a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2005;15(10): 2079-2087.
58. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Partzsch U, et al. Invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. Endoscopy 1997;29(7):626-631.
59. Hayes CE, Hattes N, Roemer PB. Volume imaging with MR phased arrays. Magn Reson Med 1991;18 (2):309-319.
60. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38(4):591-603.