Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn's disease

Gut

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1113-1120

  Rimola, J ^a   Rodriguez, S ^a   Garcia Bosch O ^a   Ordas I ^a   Ayala, E ^a   Aceituno, M ^a   Pellise M ^a   Ayuso, C ^a   Ricart, E ^a   Donoso, L ^a   Panes J ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COLITIS; COLON; COLON CROHN DISEASE; COLON ULCER; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEUM; INTESTINE ENDOSCOPY; INTESTINE POLYP; INTESTINE WALL; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LYMPH NODE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ADULT; COLON; COLONIC DISEASES; COLONOSCOPY; CROHN DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEAL DISEASES; ILEUM; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650248682     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.167957     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mary JY, Modigliani R. Development and validation of an endoscopic index of the severity for Crohn's disease: a prospective multicentre study. Groupe d'Etudes Therapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). Gut 1989;30:983-9.
2. Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Solem CA, et al. Crohn disease: mural attenuation and thickness at contrast-enhanced CT enterography - correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings of inflammation. Radiology 2006;238:505-16.
3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84.
4. Bru C, Sans M, Defelitto MM, et al. Hydrocolonic sonography for evaluating inflammatory bowel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:99-105.
5. Ajaj WM, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut 2005;54:257-63.
6. Dinter DJ, Chakraborty A, Brade J, et al. Endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a retrospective single-centre comparative study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008;43:207-16.
7. Langhorst J, Kuhle CA, Ajaj W, et al. MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13:1001-8.
8. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 2005;54:250-6.
9. Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S, et al. Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1535-42.
10. Harvey RF, Bradshaw JM. A simple index of Crohn's disease activity. Lancet 1980;1:514.
11. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Silverman R, et al. Bowel disease: prospective comparison of CT and 1.5-T pre- and postcontrast MR imaging with T1-weighted fat-suppressed and breath-hold FLASH sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:625-32.
12. Fleiss J. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.
13. Shrout P, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
14. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, et al. Imaging of small intestinal Crohn's disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1915-25.
15. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177: 1325-32.
16. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000;215:717-25.
17. Choi JY, Kim MJ, Chung YE, et al. Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system. Radiographics 2008;28:e30.
18. Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, et al. MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 2006;238:517-30.
19. Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy - feasibility study. Radiology 2003;229:275-81.
20. Akisik FM, Sandrasegaran K, Aisen AM, et al. Abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiographics 2007;27:1433-44; discussion 62-4.
21. Barth MM, Smith MP, Pedrosa I, et al. Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. Radiographics 2007;27:1445-62; discussion 62-4.
22. Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, et al. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 2006;26:641-57; discussion 57-62.
23. Colombel JF, Solem CA, Sandborn WJ, et al. Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn's disease activity by computed tomography enterography: correlation with endoscopic severity and C reactive protein. Gut 2006;55:1561-7.
24. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2005;234:452-9.
25. Jaffe TA, Gaca AM, Delaney S, et al. Radiation doses from small-bowel followthrough and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1015-22.
26. Ota Y, Matsui T, Ono H, et al. Value of virtual computed tomographic colonography for Crohn's colitis: comparison with endoscopy and barium enema. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:778-83.
27. Martinez MJ, Ripolles T, Paredes JM, et al. Assessment of the extension and the inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease: comparison of ultrasound and MRI. Abdom Imaging 2008.
28. Maconi G, Radice E, Greco S, et al. Bowel ultrasound in Crohn's disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:93-112.
29. Sans M, Fuster D, Llach J, et al. Optimization of technetium-99m-HMPAO leukocyte scintigraphy in evaluation of active inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 2000;45:1828-35.
30. Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al. A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2294-301.
31. Bernstein CN, Greenberg H, Boult I, et al. A prospective comparison study of MRI versus small bowel follow-through in recurrent Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2493-502.
32. Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A, et al. Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 2005;54:1721-7.
33. Gore RM, Balthazar EJ, Ghahremani GG, et al. CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:3-15.
34. Maconi G, Di Sabatino A, Ardizzone S, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of sonographic detection of enlarged regional lymph nodes in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:1328-33.
35. Allez M, Lemann M, Bonnet J, et al. Long term outcome of patients with active Crohn's disease exhibiting extensive and deep ulcerations at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:947-53.