Perspective: Authentic patient perspectives in simulations for procedural and surgical skills

Academic Medicine

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 889-893

  Nestel, Debra ^a   Kneebone, Roger ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Australia)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953553901     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d749ac     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Holman H, Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. BMJ. 2000;320:526-527.
2. Coulter A, Ellins J. Patient Focused Interventions: A Review of the Evidence. London, UK: Picker Institute Europe for the Health Foundation; 2006.
3. Richards N, Coulter A. Is the NHS Becoming More Patient-Centred? Trends From the National Surveys of NHS Patients in England 2002-2007. Oxford, UK: Picker Institute Europe; 2007.
4. General Medical Council. Recommendations as to the Medical Curriculum. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1947.
5. General Medical Council. Recommendations as to the Medical Curriculum. London, UK: General Medical Council; 1957.
6. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors. London, UK: General Medical Council; 2003.
7. Medical Education Committee of the British Medical Association. The Training of a Doctor: A Report of the Medical Education Committee of the British Medical Association. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1948.
8. Flexner A. Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York, NY: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910.
9. Wykurz G. Patients in medical education: From passive participants to active partners. Med Educ. 1999;33:634-636.
10. Spencer J, Blackmore D, Heard S, et al. Patient-oriented learning: A review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students. Med Educ. 2000;34:851-857.
11. Howe A, Anderson J. Involving patients in medical education. BMJ. 2003;327:326-328.
12. O'Keefe M, Britten N. Lay participation in medical school curriculum development: Whose problem is it? Med Educ. 2005;39: 651-652.
13. Coleman K, Murray E. Patients' views and feelings on the community-based teaching of undergraduate medical students: A qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2002;19:183-188.
14. Benson J, Quince T, Hibble A, Fanshawe T, Emery J. Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: Observational and qualitative study. BMJ. 2005;331:89.
15. Maguire P, Fairbairn S, Fletcher C. Consultation skills of young doctors: I- Benefits of feedback training in interviewing as students persist. BMJ. 1986;292:1573-1578.
16. Ziebland S, McPherson A. Making sense of qualitative data analysis: An introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). Med Educ. 2006;40:405-414.
17. Stark P, Hague M, Bax N. Involving patients as educators: Adding value to clinical experience. Int J Clin Skills. 2009;3:64-69.
18. Adamo G. Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: Achievements and challenges 1992-2003. Med Teach. 2003;25: 262-270.
19. Hoppe RB. Standardized (simulated) patients and the medical interview. In: Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
20. Ker JS, Dowie A, Dowell J, et al. Twelve tips for developing and maintaining a simulated patient bank. Med Teach. 2005;27:4-9.
21. Nestel D, Kneebone R, Black S. Simulated patients and the development of procedural and operative skills. Med Teach. 2006;28: 390-391.
22. Barrows HS. Simulated patients in medical teaching. Can Med Assoc J. 1968;98:674-676.
23. Black S, Nestel D, Horrocks E, et al. Evaluation of a framework for case development and simulated patient training for complex procedures. Simul Healthc. 2006;1:66-71.
24. Nestel D, Cecchini M, Calandrini M, et al. Real patient involvement in role development: Evaluating patient focused resources for clinical procedural skills. Med Teach. 2008;30:534-536.
25. Morris P. The patient's voice in doctor's learning. In: Thistlethwaite J, Morris P, eds. The Patient Doctor Consultation in Primary Care: Theory and Practice. London, UK: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2006.
26. Klitzman R. When Doctors Become Patients. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.
27. Jones P. Doctors as Patients. Oxford, UK: Radcliffe; 2005.
28. O'Brien C. Never Say Die. Sydney, Australia: HarperCollins; 2008.
29. Horne R, Price D, Cleland J, et al. Can asthma control be improved by understanding the patient's perspective? BMC Pulm Med. 2007;7:8.
30. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Wetzel C, et al. The human face of simulation: Patient-focused simulation training. Acad Med. 2006;81:919-924.
31. Kneebone R, Kidd J, Nestel D, Asvall S, Paraskeva P, Darzi A. An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Med Educ. 2002;36:628-634.
32. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Yadollahi F, et al. Assessing procedural skills in context: Exploring the feasibility of an integrated procedural performance instrument (IPPI). Med Educ. 2006;40:1105-1114.
33. Kneebone R, Nestel D, Bello F, Darzi A. An integrated procedural performance instrument (IPPI) for learning and assessing procedural skills. Clin Teach. 2008;5:45-48.
34. Higham J, Nestel D, Lupton M, Kneebone R. Teaching and learning gynaecology examination with hybrid simulation. Clin Teach. 2007;4:238-243.
35. Kneebone R, Nestel D. Learning clinical skills-The place of simulation and feedback. Clin Teach. 2005;2:86-90.
36. Nestel D, Bello F, Kneebone R, Akhtar K, Darzi A. Remote assessment and learnercentred feedback on procedural skills. Clin Teach. 2008;5:88-92.
37. Kneebone R, Bello F, Nestel D, et al. Learnercentred feedback using remote assessment of clinical procedures. Med Teach. 2008;30: 795-801.
38. LeBlanc VR, Tabak D, Kneebone R, Nestel D, MacRae H, Moulton C-A. Psychometric properties of an integrated assessment of technical and communication skills. Am J Surg. 2009;197:96-101.
39. Moulton C-A, Tabak D, Kneebone R, Nestel D, MacRae H, LeBlanc VR. Teaching communication skills using the integrated procedural performance instrument (IPPI): A randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2009;197:113-118.
40. Kneebone RL, Nestel D, Chrzanowska J, Barnet AE, Darzi A. Innovative training for new surgical roles-The place of evaluation. Med Educ. 2006;40:987-994.
41. Kneebone RL, Nestel D, Moorthy K, et al. Learning the skills of flexible sigmoidoscopy-The wider perspective. Med Educ. 2003;37(suppl 1):50-58.
42. Kneebone RL, Nestel D, Vincent C, Darzi A. Complexity, risk and simulation in learning procedural skills. Med Educ. 2007;41:808-814.
43. Nestel D, Kneebone R, Kidd J. Teaching and learning about skills in minor surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:291-296.
44. Bligh JJ, Bleakley AA. Distributing menus to hungry learners: Can learning by simulation become simulation of learning? Med Teach. 2006;28:606-613.
45. Petrusa E. Clinical performance assessments. In: Norman G, van der Vleuten C, Newble D, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 2002:673-710.
46. Petrusa E. Status of standardized patient assessment: Taking standardized patientbased examinations to the next level. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16:98-110.
47. Vu N, Barrows H, Marcy M, Verhulst S, Colliver J, Travis T. Six years of comprehensive, clinical performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 1992;67:43-50.
48. Kilminster S, Roberts T, Morris P. Incorporating patients' assessments into objective structured clinical examinations. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2007;20:6.