Lay participation in medical school curriculum development: Whose problem is it?

Medical Education

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 651-652

  O'Keefe, Maree ^a   Britten, Nicky ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; NOTE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

EID: 21244459108     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02216.x     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Holman H, Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. BMJ 2000;320:526-7.
2. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I et al. Preferences for patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ 2001;322:1-7.
3. Lewis D, Robinson J, Wilkinson E. Factors involved in deciding to start preventive treatment, qualitative study of clinicians' and lay people's attitudes. BMJ 2003;327:841.
4. Bland C, Starnaman S, Wersal L, Moorhead-Rosenberg L, Zonia S, Henry R. Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed. Acad Med 2000;75:575-94.
5. The report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-95: learning from Bristol. http://www.bristol- inquiry.org.uk/index.htm.
6. Sang B. Choice, participation and accountability, assessing the potential impact of legislation promoting patient and public involvement in health in the UK. Health Expect 2004;7:187-90.
7. Lewkonia R. The functional relationships of medical schools and health services. Med Educ 2002;36:289-95.
8. Oliver S. How can health service users contribute to the NHS research and development programme. BMJ 1995;310:1318-20.