INDIVIDUAL PRACTISING MATHEMATICS TEACHERS: Studies on Their Professional Growth

Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 3

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 35-59

  Perrin Glorian, Marie Jeanne ^a   Deblois, Lucie ^b   Robert, Aline ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE CERGY PONTOISE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952428629     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotna, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 359-381.
2. Arbaugh, F., & Brown, C. A. (2005). Analyzing Mathematical tasks: a catalyst for change? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 499-536.
3. Arbaugh, F., Lannin, J., Jones, D., & Park-Rogers, M. (2006). Examining instructional practices in Core-Plus lessons: Implications for professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 517-550.
4. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
5. Ball, D. L., Bass, H., Sleep, L., & Thames, M. (2005). A theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. 15th ICMI Study Conference: The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics. Lindoia. Brésil. http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/log_in.html
6. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: the unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
7. Barbé, J., Bosch, M., Espinoza, L., & Gascon, J. (2005). Didactic restrictions on the teacher’s practice: The case of limits of functions at Spanish high schools. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 235-268.
8. Bauersfeld, H. (1994). Réflexions sur la formation des maîtres et sur l'enseignement des mathématiques au primaire. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 20(1), 175-198.
9. Bednarz, N. (2000). Formation continue des enseignants en mathématiques: une nécessaire prise en compte du contexte. In P. Blouin & L. Gattuso (Eds.), Didactique des mathématiques et formation des enseignants (pp. 61-78). Mont-Royal, Québec, Canada: Éditions Modulo. Collection Astroïde.
10. Bednarz, N. (2007). Ancrage et tendances actuelles de la didactique des mathématiques au Québec: A la recherche de sens et de cohérence. Colloque du Groupe de Didactique des Mathématiques. Mai 2007. Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
11. Bloch, I. (2002). Différents niveaux de milieu dans la théorie des situations. In J. L. Dorier, M. Artaud, M. Artigue, R. Berthelot, & R. Floris (Eds.), Actes de la 11ème Ecole d'été de didactique des mathématiques, Corps, 2001 (pp. 125-139). Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
12. Boaler, J. (2003). Studying and capturing the complexity of practice: The case of the dance of agency. In N. Paterman, J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Psychology of Mathematics Education International Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 3-16). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
13. Bobis, J. (2004). For the sake of the children: Maintaining the momentum of professional development. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fulglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Psychology of Mathematics Education International Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 143-150). Bergen, Norway: Psychology of Mathematics Education.
14. Bodin, A. (2006). Les mathématiques face aux évaluations nationales et internationales. Repères-IREM 65, 55-89.
15. Bosch, M., & Gascon, J. (2001). Organiser l’étude: Théories et empiries. In J. L. Dorier, M. Artaud, M. Artigue, R. Berthelot, & R. Floris (Eds.), Actes de la 11ème Ecole d'été de didactique des mathématiques, Corps, 2001 (pp. 23-40). Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
16. Brodie, K. (2000). Mathematics teacher development and learner failure: Challenges for teacher education. International Mathematics Education and Society Conference. Portugal. 26-31. ERIC -# ED482653.
17. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Didactique des mathématiques 1970—1990. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Krauss, S., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., Dubberke, Th., Jordan, A., Löwen, K., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2006). Die professionelle Kompetenz von Mathematiklehrkräften: Konzeptualisierung, Erfassung und Bedeutung für den Unterricht. Eine Zwischenbilanz des COACTIV-Projekts. In M. Prenzel & L. Allolio-Näcke (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms (pp. 54-83). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
19. Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1989). Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. In G. Vergnaud, J. Rogalski, & M. Artigue (Eds.), Proceedings of 13th the Psychology of Mathematics Education International Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 34-45). Paris: Bicentenaire de la révolution française.
20. Chevallard, Y. (1999). Pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 19, 221-266.
21. Chevallard, Y. (2002). Organiser l’étude: Structures et fonctions. Ecologie et régulation. In J. L. Dorier, M. Artaud, M. Artigue, R. Berthelot, R. Floris (Eds.), Actes de la 11ème Ecole d'été de didactique des mathématiques, Corps, 2001 (pp. 3-22 and pp.41-56). Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
22. Cogan, L., & Schmidt, W. (1999). An examination of instructional practices in six countries. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International Comparisons in Mathematics Education (pp. 6885). London: Falmer.
23. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 327-345.
24. D'Ambrosio, U. (1999). Literacy, matheracy, and technocracy: A trivium for today. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 131-153.
25. DeBlois, L. (2006). Influence des interprétations des productions des élèves sur les stratégies d’intervention en classe de mathématiques. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 307-329.
26. DeBlois, L., Freiman, V., & Rousseau, M. (2007) Influences possibles sur les programmes de recherches subventionnées. Colloque du Groupe de didacticiens en mathématiques. Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
27. DeBlois, L., & Squalli, H. (2001). Une modélisation des savoirs d'expérience chez des orthopédagogues intervenant en mathématiques. In G. Debeurme (Ed.), Enseignement et difficultés d'apprentissage. (pp.153-157). Sherbrooke, Canada: Les éditions du CRP.
28. Doerr, H. (2006). Examining the tasks of teaching when using students’ mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 3-24.
29. Doerr, H., & English, L. (2006). Middle grade teachers’ learning through students’ engagement with modelling tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 5-32.
30. Empson, L., & Junk, D. L. (2004). Teachers’ knowledge of children’s mathematics after implementing a student-centered curriculum. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 121-144.
31. Erickson, G. (1991). Collaborative inquiry and the professional development of science teachers. The Journal of Educational Thought, 25(3), 228-245.
32. Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249-254). New York: Falmer Press.
33. Even, R. (2003). What can teachers learn from research in mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 38-42.
34. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.
35. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
36. Gates, P. (2006). Going beyond belief systems: exploring a model for the social influence on mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 347-369.
37. Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 177-211.
38. Grossman, P. L., Smagorinsky P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theorical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108, 1-29.
39. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Lubienski, S. T., & Id-Deen, L. (2006). Reconsidering the study of mathematics instructional practices: the importance of curricular context in understanding local and global teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 313-345.
40. Herbst, P. G. (2003). Using novel tasks in teaching mathematics: Three tensions affecting the work of the teacher. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 197-238.
41. Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2003). Exploring the practical rationality of mathematics teaching through conversations about videotaped episodes: the case of engaging students in proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1), 2-14.
42. Hersant, M., & Perrin-Glorian, M. J. (2005). Characterization of an ordinary teaching practice with the help of the theory of didactic situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 113-151.
43. Hoyles, C. (1992). Mathematics teaching and mathematics teachers: A meta-case study. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 32-44.
44. Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching. New York: Falmer Press.
45. Jaworski, B. (1997). Tensions in teachers’ conceptualisations of mathematics and of teaching. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. ERIC - # ED408151.
46. Koch, L. (1997). The growing pains of change: A case study of a third grade teacher. In J. Ferrini-Mundy & T. Schram (Eds.), Recognizing and recording reform in mathematics education project: Insights, issues and implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph 8, (pp. 87-109). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
47. Krainer, K. (2001). Teachers’ Growth is more than the growth of teachers. The case of Gisela. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of teacher education (pp. 271-294). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48. Krainer, K., Goffree, F., & Berger, P. (1999). European research in mathematics education I.3. On research in mathematics teacher education. Osnabrück: Forschungsinstitut für Mathematik didaktik. http://www.fmd.uni-osnabrueck.de/ebooks/erme/cerme1-proceedings/cerme1-group3.pdf
49. Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178-194.
50. Lave, J. (1991). Acquisition des savoirs et pratiques de groupe. Sociologie et Sociétés, 23(1), 145-162.
51. Leder, G., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (Eds.). (2003). Beliefs: A hidden variable in Mathematics Education? Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. See particularly the paper of F. Furinghetti & E. Pekhonen.
52. Leikin, R. (2006). Learning by teaching: The case of Sieve of Eratosthenes and one elementary school teacher. In R. Zazkis & S. Campbell (Eds.), Number theory in mathematics education: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
53. Lerman, S. (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of teacher education (pp. 33-52). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
54. Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Guttierez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
55. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teacher's understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and in the U.S. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Margolinas, C. (2002). Situations, milieux, connaissances. Analyse de l’activité du professeur. In J. L. Dorier, M. Artaud, M. Artigue, R. Berthelot, & R. Floris (Eds.), Actes de la 11ème Ecole d'été de didactique des mathématiques, Corps, 2001 (pp.141-155). Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
57. Margolinas, C., Coulange, L., & Bessot, A. (2005). What can the teacher learn in the classroom? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 205-234.
58. Margolinas, C., & Perrin-Glorian, M. J. (1997). Editorial: Les recherches sur l’enseignant en France, Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 17(3), 7-15.
59. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1994). L'arbre de la connaissance. Paris: Addison-Wesley.
60. Mura, R. (1995). Images of mathematics held by university teachers of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 385-399.
61. Pariès, M., Robert, A., & Rogalski, J. (in press). Analyses de séances en classe et stabilité des pratiques d'enseignants de mathématiques expérimentés en seconde. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
62. Perrin-Glorian, M. J. (1999). Problèmes d'articulation de cadres théoriques: l'exemple du concept de milieu. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(3), 279-321.
63. Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practices. In A. Guttierez & P. Boero (Eds), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future (pp. 461-494). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
64. Ponte, J. P., Matos, J. F., Guimaräes, H. M., Leal, L. C., & Canavarro, A. P. (1994). Teachers and students’ views and attitudes towards a new mathematics curriculum: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 347-365.
65. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
66. Robert, A., & Robinet, J. (1996). Prise en compte du méta en didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 16(2), 145-175.
67. Robert, A., & Rogalski, J. (2002). Le système complexe et cohérent des pratiques des enseignants de mathématiques: une double approche. La revue canadienne de l'enseignement des sciences des mathématiques et des technologies, 2(4), 505-527.
68. Robert, A., & Rogalski, J. (2005). A cross-analysis of the mathematics teacher’s activity. Example in a French 10th-grade class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 269-298.
69. Roditi, E. (2005). Les pratiques enseignantes en mathématiques: Entre contraintes et liberté pédagogique. Paris: l’Harmattan.
70. Roditi, E. (2006). Une formation pour la pratique et par la pratique, des hypothèses sur la formation continue. Colloque international “Espace Mathématique Francophone 2006”, Université de Sherbrooke (Canada).
71. Rota, S., & Leikin, R. (2002). Development of mathematics teachers’ proficiency in discussion orchestration. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Psychology of Mathematics Education International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 137-144). Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia.
72. Salin, M. H. (2002). Repères sur l’évolution du concept de milieu en théorie des situations. In J. L. Dorier, M. Artaud, M. Artigue, R. Berthelot, & R. Floris (Eds.), Actes de la 11ème Ecole d'été de didactique des mathématiques, Corps, 2001 (pp. 111-124). Grenoble, France: La Pensée Sauvage.
73. Scherer, P., & Steinbring, H. (2006). Noticing children’s learning processes - Teachers jointly reflect on their own classroom interaction for improving mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 157-185.
74. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
75. Sensevy, G., Mercier, A., & Schubauer-Leoni, M. L. (2000). Vers un modèle de l’action didactique du professeur. A propos de la course à 20. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 20(3), 263304.
76. Sensevy, G., Schubauer-Leoni, M. L., Mercier, A., Ligozat, F., & Perrot, G. (2005). An attempt to model the teacher’s action in the mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59, 153-181.
77. Sfard, A. (2005). What could be more practical than good research? On mutual relations between research and practice of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 393-413.
78. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
79. Skott, J. (2004). The forced autonomy of mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 227-257.
80. Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 157-189.
81. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
82. Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Describing elements of mathematics lessons that accommodate diversity in student background. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fulglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Psychology of Mathematics Education International Conference (V ol. 4, pp. 257-264). Bergen, Norway: Psychology of Mathematics Education.
83. Suurtamm, C. A. (2004). Developing authentic assessment: Case studies of secondary school mathematics teachers’ experiences. The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4, 497-513.
84. Sztajn, P. (2003). Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 53-75.
85. Sztajn, P., Alex-Saht, M., White, D. Y., & Hackenberg, A. (2004). School-based community of teachers and outcome for students. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fulglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Psychology of Mathematics Education International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 273-280). Bergen, Norway: Psychology of Mathematics Education.
86. Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematical teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
87. Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. (2003). Challenging and changing mathematics teaching classrooms practices. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook on mathematics education (pp. 643-687). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
88. Tzur, R. (2002). From theory to practice: Explaining successful and unsuccessful teaching activites (case of fractions). In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Psychology of Mathematics Education International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 297-304). Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia.
89. Vincent, S. (2001). Le trajet du ‘savoir à enseigner’ dans les pratiques de classe. Une analyse de points de vue d’enseignants. In Ph. Jonnaert & S. Laurin (Eds.), Les didactiques des disciplines. Un débat contemporain (pp. 210-239). Sainte-Foy, Canada: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
90. Warfield, V. (2006). Invitation to didactique. http://www.math.washington.edu/~warfield/Didactique. html
91. Wilson, P. S., Cooney, T. J., & Stinson, D. W. (2005). What constitutes good mathematics teaching and how it develops: Nine high school teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 83-111.
92. Wood, T. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics differently: Reflection matters. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Psychology of Mathematics Education International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 431-438). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
93. Zaslavsky, O., Chapman, O., & Leikin, R. (2003). Professional development in Mathematics Education. Trends and tasks. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook on mathematics education (pp. 877-915). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.