Developing authentic assessment: Case studies of secondary school mathematics teachers’ experiences

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 497-513

  Suurtamme, Christine A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011484739     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926150409556630     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Borko, H. (1997). Teachers’ developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Success, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(3), 259-278.
2. Brown, C.A., & Baird, J. (1993). Inside the teacher: Knowledge, beliefs and attitudes. In P. Wilson (Ed.), Research Ideas for the Classroom: High School Mathematics (pp. 245-259). New York: MacMillan.
3. Carpenter, T.P., & Fennema, E. (1991). Research and cognitively guided instruction. In E. Fen-nema, T.P. Carpenter, & S.J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 1-16). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
4. Clarke, David J. (1992). Activating assessment alternatives in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 39(6), 24-29.
5. Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A., & Noddings, N. (1990). Introduction: Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. In Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics [monograph 4]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1-3.
6. Even, R., and Tirosh, D. (2002). Teacher knowledge and understanding of students’ mathematical learning. In L.D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 219-240). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Flexer, R.J. (1995). How ‘messing about’ with performance assessment in mathematics affects what happens in classrooms. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
8. Franke, M.L., & Carey, D.A. (1997). Young children’s perceptions of mathematics in problemsolving environments. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(1), 8-25.
9. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
10. Ginsberg, H.P., Lopez, L.S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Yamamoto, T., Willis, M., & Kelly, M.S. (1992). Assessing understandings of arithmetic. In R. Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 265-292). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
11. Goldin, G. (1992). Towards an assessment framework for school mathematics. In R. Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 63-88). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
12. Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Kulm, G. (1994). Mathematics assessment: What works in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jos-sey-Bass.
14. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Lehman, M.F. (1995). Assessing mathematics performance assessment: A continuing process. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
16. Lester, F.K., & Kroll, D.L. (1990). Assessing student growth in mathematical problem solving. In G. Kulm (Ed.), Assessing higher order thinking in mathematics (pp. 52-70). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
17. McDougall, D.E. (1997). Mathematics teachers' needs in dynamic geometric computer environments: In search of control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.
18. Maher, C.A., Davis, R.B., & Alston, A. (1992). A teacher’s struggle to assess student cognitive growth. In R. Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 249-264). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
19. Mathematical Sciences Education Board and National Research Council. (1993). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Morgan, C., & Watson, A. (2002). The interpretative nature of assessment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 78-110.
21. Morony, W., & Olssen, K. (1994). Support for informal assessment in mathematics in the context of standards referenced. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 387-399.
22. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
25. Neill, D.M., & Medina, N.J. (1989). Standardized testing: Harmful to educational health. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 688-697.
26. Romberg, T.A., Zarinnia, E.A. & Collis, K.F. (1990). A new world view of assessment in mathematics. In G. Kulm (Ed.), Assessing higher order thinking in mathematics (pp. 21-38). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
27. Roulet, R.G. (1998). Exemplary mathematics teachers: Subject conceptions and instructional practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.
28. Rowley, G., Leder, G., and Brew, C. (1994, November). Learning from assessment: Mathematics and the VCE. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Newcastle.
29. Rowley, G., Brew, C., and Ryan, J.T. (1996, April). Statewide assessment in mathematics: The problems presented by curricular choice. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
30. Ryan, P. (1994). Teacher perspectives of the impact and validity of the Mt. Diablo third-grade-curriculum-based alternative assessment of mathematics (CBAAM). San Francisco, CA: Far West Lab for Educational Research and Development.
31. Schoen, H., Cebulla, K., Finn, K., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228-259
32. Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
33. Shepard, L. (1994). Second report on case study of the effects of alternative assessment in instruction. Student learning and accountability practices: Project 3.1. Studies in improving classroom and local assessments. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
34. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 27(7), 414.
35. Webb, N.L., & Coxford, A.F. (Eds.). (1993). Assessment in the mathematics classroom. Reston, VA: NCTM.
36. Wiggins, G. (1994, October). Toward better report cards. Educational Leadership 52, 28-37.
37. Wood, T., & Sellers, P. (1997). Deepening the analysis: Longitudinal assessment of problem-centered mathematics program. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 163-186.