Learning by teaching: The case of sieve of eratosthenes and one elementary school teacher

Number Theory in Mathematics Education: Perspectives and Prospects

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 115-140

  Leikin, Roza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548510058     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203053904     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (2002). Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Atkinson, T., & Claxton, G. (Eds.). (2000). The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
3. Berliner, D. C. (1987). Ways of thinking about students and classrooms by more and less experienced teachers. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 60-83). London: Cassell.
4. Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics teaching: Dynamics of the high school algebra classroom. New York: Teachers College.
5. Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2001). An approach for supporting teachers' learning in social context. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 207-231). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
6. Cooney T. J. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 9-31). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
7. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.
8. Fischbein, E. (1982). Intuition and proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 9-18, 24.
9. Fischbein, E. (1984). The interactions between the formal, the algorithmic, and the intuitive components in a mathematical activity. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträβer, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 231-245). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.
11. Kennedy, M. M. (2002). Knowledge and teaching. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 355-370.
12. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Aligning teacher education with contemporary K-12 reform visions. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 33-53). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Leikin, R. (2004, January). Learning through teaching: Intuitive and formal knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Mathematics Educators in Israel: In Memoriam the late Prof. Efraim Fischbein. Tel Aviv University, Israel.
15. Leikin, R. (2005). Qualities of professional dialog: Connecting graduate research on teaching and the undergraduate teachers' program. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(1-2), 237-256.
16. Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2000). Learning through teaching: The case of symmetry. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(1), 17-36.
17. Leikin, R., & Dinur, S. (2003). Patterns of flexibility: Teachers' behavior in mathematical discussion. Electronic Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. http://www.dm.unipi.it/~didattica/CERME3/WG11
18. Leinhardt, G. (1993). On teaching. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. E. (1994). Action-theoretic and phenomenological approaches to research in mathematics education: Studies on continually developing experts. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträβer, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 277-286). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teacher's understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels ofawareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243-267.
22. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York: Falmer.
23. Roth, W. M. (1998). Science teaching as knowledgeability: A case study of knowing and learning during co-teaching. Science Education, 82(3), 357-377.
24. Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of knowledge. An introduction to epistemology and education. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
25. Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teachers' seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 55-87.
26. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
27. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
28. Simon, A. M. (1997). Developing new models of mathematics teaching: An imperative for research on mathematics teacher development. In E. Fennema & B. Scott-Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 55-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(2), 157-189.
31. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
32. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. E. (1987). "150" different ways of knowledge in teaching: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 1-37). London: Cassell.
34. Yolles, A. (2001). Making connections with prime numbers. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7, 84.
35. Zazkis, R., & Campbell, C. (1996). Prime decomposition: Understanding uniqueness. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 207-218.
36. Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2004). Understanding primes: The role of representation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 164-186.