The relationship between ICT use and science knowledge for czech students: A secondary analysis of pisa 2006

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 523-543

  Kubiatko, Milan ^a   Vlckova, Katerina ^a  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Czech Republic; ICT; Information and communication technology; Large scale data; PISA; Science knowledge; Students

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952319859     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-010-9195-6     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ainley, J., Banks, D., & Fleming, M. (2002). The influence of IT: Perspectives from five Australian schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 395-404.
2. Anderson, J. O., Lin, H.-S., Treagust, D. F., Ross, S. P., & Yore, L. D. (2007). Using large-scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 591-614.
3. Baggott la Velle, L. M., Watson, K. E., & Nichol, J. D. (2001). OtherScope-the virtual microscope-can the real learning experiences in practical science be simulated? International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 2(5/6), 539-556.
4. Baggott la Velle, L. M., McFarlane, A., & Brawn, R. (2003). Knowledge transformation through ICT in science education: A case study in teacher-driven curriculum development. Case study 1. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 183-199.
5. Barak, M. (2007). Transition from traditional to ICT-enhanced learning environments in undergraduate chemistry courses. Computers & Education, 48(1), 30-43.
6. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395-414.
7. Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the 'wow' factor: Developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86(316), 97-103.
8. Brewer, C. (2003). Computer in the classroom: How information technology can improve conservation education. Conservation Biology, 17(3), 657-660.
9. Castillo, N. (2006). The implementation of information and communication technology (ICT): An investigation into the level of use and integration of ICT by secondary school teachers in Chile. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, King's College London, University of London, England.
10. Chambers, A., & Davies, G. (2001). ICT and language learning. A European perspective. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
11. Charness, N., Kelley, C. L., Bosman, E. A., & Mottram, M. (2001). Word processing training and retraining: Effects of adult age, experience, and interface. Psychology and Aging, 16(1), 110-127.
12. Cox, M. J. (2000). Information and communication technologies: Their role and value for science education. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching-what research has to say (pp. 142-158). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
13. Cox, M. J., & Abbott, C. (2004). ICT and attainment: A review of the research literature. London: British Educational Communications & Technology Agency, Department for Education & Skills.
14. Cox, M. J., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies Journal, 12(1), 59-70.
15. Dede, C., & Palombo, M. (2004). Virtual worlds for learning. Threshold (Summer), 16-20.
16. Demiraslan, Y., & Usluel, Y. K. (2008). ICT integration processes in Turkish schools: Using activity theory to study issues and contradictions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 458-474.
17. Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4(1), 21-31.
18. Feinsinger, P. (2001). Designing field studies for biodiversity conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
19. Finlayson, H., & Rogers, L. (2003). Does ICT in science really work in the classroom? Part 1: The individual teacher experience. School Science Review, 84(309), 105-111.
20. Hand, B., Prain, V., & Yore, L. D. (2001). Sequential writing tasks' influence on science learning. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 105-129). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
21. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.
22. Hitch, M. (2000). Another dimension: Introducing ICT into science lessons is easy, time-saving and enjoyable. Times Educational Supplement Curriculum Special, Spring, pp. 18-19.
23. Jedeskog, G., & Nissen, J. (2004). ICT in the classroom: Is doing more important than knowing? Education and Information Technologies, 9(1), 37-45.
24. John, P. (2005). The sacred and the profane: Subject sub-culture, pedagogical practice and teachers' perceptions of the classroom uses of ICT. Educational Review, 57(4), 471-490.
25. Kennewell, S., & Morgan, A. (2006). Factors influencing learning through play in ICT settings. Computers & Education, 46(3), 265-279.
26. Korte, W. B., & Hüsing, T. (2007). Benchmarking access and use of ICT in European schools 2006: Results from head teacher and a classroom teacher surveys in 27 European countries. eLearning Papers, 2(1). Available from http://www. elearningeuropa. info/files/media/media11563. pdf.
27. Lim, P. C., & Tay, L. Z. (2003). Information and communication technologies (ICT) in an elementary school: Students' engagement in higher order thinking. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(4), 425-451.
28. Lin, J. M. C., Lee, G. C., & Chen, H. Y. (2004). Exploring potential uses of ICT in Chinese language arts instruction: Eight teachers' perspectives. Computers & Education, 42(2), 133-148.
29. Munro, R. (2002). Curriculum focused ICT-the critical resource. In D. M. Watson & J. Andersen (Eds.), Networking the learner. Computers in education (pp. 179-188). Boston: Kluwer.
30. O'Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16(5), 455-474.
31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world (vol. 1: Analysis). Paris: Author.
32. Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions. Futurelab Report No. 6. Available from http://www. futurelab. org. uk/resources/documents/lit_reviews/Secondary_Science_Review. pdf.
33. Preston, C. J. (2008). Braided learning: An emerging process observed in e-communities of practice. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 4(2), 220-243.
34. Reece, G. J. (2005). Critical thinking and cognitive transfer: Implications for the development of online information literacy tutorials. Research Strategies, 20(4), 482-493.
35. Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT-the hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151-167.
36. Robertson, S. L. (2005). Re-imagining and rescripting the future of education: Global knowledge economy discourses and the challenge to education systems. Comparative Education, 41(2), 151-170.
37. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in teaching and learning secondary English, Mathematics and Science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 259-275.
38. Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 45(2), 131-142.
39. Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343-355.
40. Sohail, M. S., & Daud, S. (2009). Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: Perspectives from Malaysia. VINE, 39(2), 125-142.
41. Speier, C., Vessey, I., & Valacich, J. S. (2003). The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 771-797.
42. Stephenson, J. (Ed.). (2001). Learner-managed learning-an emerging pedagogy for online learning. Teaching and learning online: Pedagogies for new technologies. London: Kogan Page.
43. Vogel, D., & Klassen, J. (2001). Technology-supported learning: Status, issues and trends. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 104-114.
44. Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-634.
45. Volman, M., van Eck, E., Heemsker, I., & Kuiper, E. (2004). New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers & Education, 45(1), 35-55.
46. Wang, T. J. (2008). Using ICT to enhance academic learning: Pedagogy and practice. Educational Research and Review, 3(4), 101-106.
47. Wentling, T. L., Park, J., & Peiper, C. (2006). Learning gains associated with annotation and communication software designed for large undergraduate classes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 36-46.
48. Wood, D. (2009). Comments on "Learning with ICT: New perspectives on help seeking and information searching." Computers & Education, 53(4), 1048-1051.
49. Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559-589.