What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms?

Computers and Education

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 395-414

  Baylor, Amy L ^a   Ritchie, Donn ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Improving classroom teaching; Teacher education; Teacher morale; Technology integration; Technology literacy

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INTEGRATION; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; STUDENTS;

CURRICULUM ALIGNMENTS; HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS; IMPROVING CLASSROOM TEACHING; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TEACHER EDUCATION; TEACHER MORALE; TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY; TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION;

TEACHING;

EID: 31244438400     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, L.S. (1996). Technology planning at state, district, and local levels. ERIC Digest, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 393 448).
2. Becker, H. J. (1991). How computers are used in United States school: basic data from the 1989 I.E.A. Computers in Education Survey. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(4), 385-406.
3. Brunner, C. (1992). Integrating technology into the curriculum: Teaching the teachers (No. CTE-TR-25). New York: Bank Street College of Education, Center for Technology in Education.
4. Dede, C. J. (1994). Leadership without followers. In G. Kearsley, & W. Lynch (Eds.), Educational technology: leadership perspectives (pp. 19-28). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
5. Elmer-Dewitt, P. (1991). Education: The revolution that fizzled. Time, May, 48-49.
6. Evans-Andris, M. (1995). An examination of computing styles among teachers in elementary schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 15-31.
7. George, Y. S., Malcolm, S. M., & Jeffers, L. (1993). Computer equity for the future. Communications of the AMC, 36(5), 78-81 Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.acm.org/pubs/toc/Abstracts/cacm/155070.html..
8. Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (1998). Integrating technology for meaningful learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
9. Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers integration of computers. American Journal of Education, 101, 261-315.
10. Hawkins, J., & Collins, A. (1992). Design-experiments for infusing technology into learning. Educational Technology, 32(9), 63-67.
11. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta analytic studies of findings on computer based instruction. In E. L. Baker, & H. F. O'Neil Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Lajoie, S., & Derry, S. (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Liao, Y. (1992). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 367-380.
14. Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1994). Computers and teachers: factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 220-237.
15. Marcinkiewicz, H. R., & Regstad, N. G. (1996). Using subjective norms to predict teachers' computer use. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13(1), 27-33.
16. Maurer, M. M., & Davidson, G. S. (1998). Leadership in instructional technology. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
17. Niederhauser, D. S., Stoddart, T. (1994). Teachers' perspectives on computer-assisted instruction: Transmission versus construction of knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
18. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). (1995). Teachers and technology: making the connection. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
19. Picciano, A. G. (1998). Educational leadership and planning for technology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Panel on Educational Technology. (1997). Report to the President on the Use of Technology to Strengthen K-12 Education in the United States. Retrieved 15 January, 1998 from the World Wide Web: http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/NSTC/PCAST/k- 12ed.html.
21. Raizen, S. A., Sellwood, P., Todd, R. D., & Vickers, M. (1995). Technology education in the classroom: understanding the designed world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
22. Rhodes, D. C. (1994). Sharing the vision: creating and communicating common goals, and understanding the nature of change in education. In G. Kearsley, & W. Lynch (Eds.), Educational technology: leadership perspectives (pp. 29-38). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
23. Rieber, L. P., & Welliver, P. W. (1989). Infusing educational technology into mainstream educational computing. International Journal of Instructional Media, 16(1), 21-32.
24. Rubin, L. (1989). Curriculum and staff development. In M. F. Wideen, & I. Andrews (Eds.), Staff development for school improvement (pp. 170-181). New York: Falmer.
25. Ryan, A. W. (1991). Meta-analysis of achievement effects of microcomputer applications in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 161-184.
26. Salomon, G. (1986). Educational technologies: what you see is not (always) what you get. Educational Psychologist, 20, 207-216.
27. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.