Computers in the classroom: How information technology can improve conservation education

Conservation Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 657-660

  Brewer, Carol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER; CONSERVATION; EDUCATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0037904397     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01739.x     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Batson, T., and R. Bass. 1996. Primacy of process: teaching and learning in the computer age. Change Magazine 28:42-47.
2. Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
3. Cuban, L. 2001. Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
4. Dede, C. 2000. Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies 32:3-7.
5. Feinsinger, P. 2001. Designing field studies for biodiversity conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
6. National Research Council (NRC). 1996. From analysis to action: undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: report of a convocation. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
7. National Research Council (NRC). 2000. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
8. National Research Council (NRC). 2002. Enhancing undergraduate learning with information technology: a workshop summary. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
9. Orr, D. 1994. Technological fundamentalism. Conservation Biology 8:335-337.
10. Orr, D. 1996. Slow knowledge. Conservation Biology 10:699-702.
11. Starr, P. 1996. Computing our way to educational reform. The American Prospect 27: 50-59.