Learning gains associated with annotation and communication software designed for large undergraduate classes

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 36-46

  Wentling, T L ^a   Park, J ^b   Peiper, C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Annotation and communication software; eFuzion; Engineering students; Large classroom; Wireless device

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846184717     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00197.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adams D. & Hamm M. (1988) New directions in learning: understanding media symbol systems. Educational Technology 28, 28-30.
2. Anjaneyulu K., Singer R. & Harding R. (1998) Usability studies of a remedial multimedia system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7, 207-236.
3. Carey J.M., Ed. (1991) Human Factors in Information Systems: An Organizational Perspective, Ablex Publishing, Norwood.
4. Carter V. (1996) Do medial influence learning? Revising the debage in the context of distance education. Open Learning 11, 31-40.
5. Clark R.E. (1983) Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research 53, 445-459.
6. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
7. Crowther M.S., Keller C.C. & Waddoups G.L. (2004) Improving the quality and effectiveness of computer-mediated instruction through usability evaluations. British Journal of Educational Technology 35, 289-303.
8. Dringus L.P. (1995) An iterative usability evaluation procedure for interactive online courses. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development 7, 10-14.
9. Gilcher K.W. & Johnstone S.M. (1988) A Critical Review of the Use of Audio graphic Conferencing Systems by Selected Educational Institutions. Annenberg/CPB project and University of Maryland University College, Office of Instructional Telecommunications, Washington DC.
10. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. & Black W.C. (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11. Hillman D.C., Willis D.J. & Gunawardena C.N. (1994) Learner-interface interaction in distance education: an extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education 8, 30-42.
12. Kozma R.B. (1991) Learning with media. Review of Educational Research 61, 179-211.
13. Kozma R.B. (1994) Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development 42, 7-19.
14. Moore M.G. (1989) Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 3, 1-6.
15. Peiper C., Chan E., Campbell R., Bresler J. & Al-Muhtad J. (2004) Expanding education through active space collaboration. Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, pp. 236-240.
16. Rheingold H. (1990) An interview with Don Norman. In The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design (ed. B. Baurel), pp. 5-10. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
17. Shackel B. (1997) Human-computer interaction: whence and whither? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48, 970-986.
18. Volery T. & Lord D. (2000) Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management 14, 216-223.
19. Wagner E.D. (1994) In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 8, 6-29.