A source of metacomprehension inaccuracy

Reading Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 251-265

  Moore, DeWayne ^a   Lin Agler, Lin Miao ^b   Zabrucky, Karen M ^c  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Southern Mississippi Gulf Coast   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22944482174     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710590962578     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3), 353-363.
3. Chemers, M. M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year-college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55-64.
4. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
5. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 702-718.
6. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 15, 84-93.
7. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-137.
8. Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 10, 597-602.
9. Lin, L., Moore, D., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2001). An assessment of students' calibration of comprehension and calibration of performance using multiple measures. Reading Psychology, 22, 111-128.
10. Lin, L., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345-391.
11. Lin, L., Zabrucky, K, & Moore, D. (1997). The relations among interest, self-assessed comprehension, and comprehension performance in young adults. Reading Research and Instruction, 36(2), 127-139.
12. Lin, L., Zabrucky, K. M., & Moore, D. (2002). Effects of text difficulty and adults' age on relative calibration of comprehension. American Journal of Psychology, 115(2), 187-198.
13. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
14. Maki, R. H. (1998). Test predictions over text material. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacomprehension in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 117-144). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
15. Mitchell, T. R., Hopper, H., Daniels, D., George-Falvy,J., & James, L. R. (1994). Predicting self-efficacy and performance during skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 506-517.
16. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
17. Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48-58.
18. Sexton, T., & Tuckman, B. W. (1991). Self-beliefs and behavior: The role of self-efficacy and outcome expectation over time. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(7), 725-736.
19. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Going beyond traditional motivational and behavioral approaches. Organizational Dynamics, 26(4), 62-74.
20. Weaver, C. A. III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 12-22.