A Philosophy of Evidence Law: Justice in the Search for Truth

A Philosophy of Evidence Law: Justice in the Search for Truth

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-368

  Ho, H L ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Empathic care; Epistemology; Ethics; Fact finding; Justice; Proof; Trial; Verdict; Virtue

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950416760     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228300.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (451)

1. Henry M Hart Jr and John T McNaughton, 'Some Aspects of Evidence and Inference in the Law' in Daniel Lerner (ed), Evidence And Inference (Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1958) 52.
2. R A Duff, Trials and Punishments (Cambridge: CUP, 1986) 116.
3. Antony Duff, Lindsay Farmer, Sandra Marshall and Victor Tadras, 'Introduction: Towards A Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial' in Antony Duff et al (eds), The Trial on Trial-Truth and Due Process, vol 1(Oxford: Hart, 2004);
4. Kent Bach, 'Speech Acts and Pragmatics' in Michael Devitt and Richard Hanley (eds), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006) 147, 147.
5. Michael S Pardo, 'Testimony', forthcoming in (2007) 82 Tulane L Rev, draft available at: .
6. Jennifor Lackey, 'Norms of Assertion', forthcoming in Noûs, available at her homepage: .
7. Déirdre M Dwyer, 'Knowledge, Truth and Justification in Legal Fact Finding' (2007) 1 The Reasoner, issue 4, 5. Both are available at .
8. available under the 'Publications' area of the Ninth Circuit's website at .
9. Vern R Walker, 'Epistemic and Non-epistemic Aspects of the Factfinding Process in Law', Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 5 (2005) 6-8, available at .
10. Nishi Shah and David J Velleman, 'Doxastic Deliberation' (2005) 114 The Philosophical Rev 497.
11. Alan Wykes in Dulan Barber and Giles Gordon (eds), Members of the Jury (London: Wildwood House, 1976) 142.
12. Mike Redmayne, Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation (1999) 62 MLR 167, 177-178;
13. Rosemary Pattenden, The Risk of Non-Persuasion in Civil Trials: The Case Against a Floating Standard of Proof [1988] Civil Justice Quarterly 220, 224-225.
14. Joseph Raz, 'Reasons: Practical and Adaptive' (July 2007) Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No 12/2007, draft available at SSRN: .
15. K J Carruthers, 'Some observations on the Standard of Proof in Marine Insurance Cases with Special Reference to the "Popi M" Case' (1988) 62 Australian LJ 199;
16. D H Hodgson, 'The Scales of Justice: Probability and Proof in Legal Fact-finding' (1995) 69 Australian LJ 731;
17. Richard M Eggleston, Evidence, Probability And Proof (2nd edn, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1983) 130-137.
18. J P McBaine, 'Burden of Proof: Degrees of Belief' (1944) 32 California L Rev 242, 250;
19. Edmund M Morgan, Some Problems of Proof under the Anglo-American System Of Litigation (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1956) 84.
20. Paul Humphreys, 'Probability, Interpretations of' in Edward Craig (ed), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1998) vol 7, 701-705;
21. Donald Gillies, Philosophical Theories of Probability (London: Routledge, 2000);
22. Alan Hájek, 'Interpretations of Probability', entry in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy available at: (2003);
23. Roy Weatherford, Philosophical Foundations of Probability Theory (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982) 221-222.
24. Philip Dawid, 'Probability and Proof', Appendix II to Terence Anderson, David Schum and William Twining, Analysis of Evidence (2nd edn, Cambridge: CUP, 2005), available only online at: .
25. Bernard Robertson and G A Vignaux, Interpreting Evidence-Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley, 1995).
26. Paul Roberts and Adrian Zuckerman, Criminal Evidence (Oxford: OUP, 2004) at 120-132;
27. Roger C Park and Michael J Saks, 'Evidence Scholarship Reconsidered: Results of the Interdisciplinary Turn' (2006) 47 Boston College L Rev 949 at 988-995.
28. Richard Lempert, 'The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of Proof' (1986) 66 Boston University L Rev 439;
29. John Tozer, 'On the Measure of the Force of Testimony in Cases of Legal Evidence' (1849) 8 Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 143.
30. Colin Howson and Peter Urbach, Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach (La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1989) 228.
31. Richard A Posner, The Problems of Jurisprudence (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1990) 212;
32. Vern R Walker, 'Preponderance, Probability and Warranted Factfinding' (1996) 62 Brooklyn L Rev 1075, 1102-1104;
33. Frederick Schauer, Profiles, Probabilities and Stereotypes (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 2003) 89-90.
34. Even H L A Hart, who provided a compelling case against the sanction theory of law, appeared to have conceded as much: The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Series, 1994) 27-28.
35. James Fitzjames Stephen, A General View Of The Criminal Law Of England (London: Macmillan, 1863) 239;
36. C J Misak, Truth And The End Of Inquiry-A Peircean Account Of Truth (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991) 49.
37. David Christensen, Putting Logic in its Place: Formal Constraints on Rational Belief (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004) 19-20.
38. David Owens, Reason Without Freedom-The Problem Of Epistemic Normativity (London: Routledge, 2000) 144.
39. Stuart Hampshire, Freedom of the Individual (London: Chatto and Windus, 1975) 101-102.
40. Jonathan E Adler, Belief's Own Ethics (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2002) 235.
41. Gilbert Harman, Change in View (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1986) 22.
42. Susan Haack, Defending Science-Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism (New York: Prometheus, 2003) 75.
43. Alan R White, Modal Thinking (Oxford: Blackwell, 1975) 69.
44. Susan Haack, Defending Science-Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism (New York: Prometheus, 2003) 75:
45. Risto Hilpinen, 'Some Epistemological Interpretations of Modal Logic' in G H von Wright (ed), Logic and Philosophy (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980) 19, 20.
46. Dana K Nelkin, 'The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality' (2000) 109 The Philosophical Review 373.
47. Mark Kaplan, Decision Theory as Philosophy (Cambridge: CUP, 1996) 95.
48. L Jonathan Cohen, 'On Analyzing the Standards of Forensic Evidence: A Reply to Schoeman' (1987) 54 Philosophy of Science 92, 94.
49. Contrast AlfRoss, 'The Value of Blood Tests as Evidence in Paternity Cases' (1957) 71 Harvard L Rev 466, 482-483
50. A A S Zuckerman, 'Law, Fact or Justice' (1986) 66 Boston University L Rev 487, 499.
51. David T Wasserman, 'The Morality of Statistical Proof and the Risk of Mistaken Liability' (1991) 13 Cardozo L Rev 935, 943.
52. Frederick Schauer, Profiles, Probabilities and Stereotypes (Cambridge, Massachuetts: Harvard UP, 2003) 93-96;
53. Alan M Dershowitz, Reasonable Doubts: The Criminal Justice System and the OJ Simpson Case (NY: Touchstone, 1997) 40;
54. Ferdinand Schoeman, 'Statistical vs. Direct Evidence' (1987) 21 Noûs 179;
55. Steven C Salop, 'Evaluating Uncertain Evidence with Sir Thomas Bayes: A Note for Teachers' (1987) 1 J of Economic Perspectives 155;
56. Richard A Wasserstrom, The Judicial Decision-Toward a Theory of Legal Justification (Stanford, California: Stanford UP, 1961) 164-165.
57. Jeremy Waldron, 'Does Law Promise Justice?' (2001) 17 Georgia State University L Rev 759, 779.
58. Jochen Runde, 'Shackle on Probability' in Peter E Earl and Stephen F Frowen (eds), Economics as an Art of Thought-Essays in Memory of G L S Shackle (London: Routledge, 2000) 225.
59. Moacir dos Anjos Jr and Victoria Chick, 'Liquidity and Potential Surprise' in Peter E Earl and Stephen F Frowen (eds), Economics as an Art of Thought -Essays in Memory of G L S Shackle (London: Routledge, 2000) 242, 251:
60. G L S Shackle, Imagination And The Nature Of Choice (Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1979) 88.
61. Frank H Stephen, 'Decision Making Under Uncertainty: In Defence of Shackle' (1986) 13 J of Economic Studies 45, 45.
62. Fred Dretske, 'The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge' (1981) 40 Philosophical Studies 363, 367.
63. David Lewis, 'Elusive Knowledge' (1996) 74 Australasian Journal of Philosophy 549, 554.
64. Alvin I Goldman, 'Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge' (1976) 73 Journal of Philosophy 771, 774.
65. Stewart Cohen, 'Skepticism, Relevance, and Relativity' in Brian P McLaughlin (ed), Dretske and His Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991) 32.
66. available at: .
67. Judgment dated 16 November 2005 (available at ).
68. Ronald J Allen, 'The Narrative Fallacy, the Relative Plausibility Theory, and a Theory of the Trial,' International Commentary on Evidence: vol 3 (2005): issue 1, article 5, available at:
69. Andrew Palmer, Proof and the Preparation of Trials (Pyrmont NSW: Lawbook, 2003) 43.
70. W Lance Bennett and Martha S Feldman, Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom-Justice and Judgment in American Culture (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1981);
71. Nancy Pennington and Reid Hastie, 'Evidence Evaluation in Complex Decision Making' (1986) 51 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 242;
72. Bernard S Jackson, Law, Fact and Narrative Coherence (Liverpool: Deborah Charles, 1988) 85:
73. Doron Menashe and Mutal E Shamash 'The Narrative Fallacy,' International Commentary on Evidence: vol 3 (2005): issue 1, article 3, available at: .
74. Joel Feinberg, Harm to Others (Oxford: OUP, 1984) 201.
75. Gilbert Harman, 'Knowledge, Inference and Explanation' (1968) 5 American Philosophical Quarterly 164, 167.
76. Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: OUP, 1978) 86-97.
77. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (revised edn, Oxford: OUP, 1999) 75.
78. Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) [2001] Fam 147, 203:
79. Barbara Shapiro, 'The Concept "Fact": Legal Origins and Cultural Diffusion' (1994) 26 Albion 227.
80. Barbara Shapiro, 'The Concept "Fact": Legal Origins and Cultural Diffusion' (1994) 26 Albion 227.
81. V Colman, 'Reason and Unreason in Early Medieval Law' (1974) 4 J Intl History 571, 580;
82. Paul Vinogradoff, Villainage in England-Essays in English Mediaeval History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1892) 377;
83. A L Goodhart and H G Hanbury (eds), William Holdsworth, A History of English Law, vol 1 (7th edn, London: Methuen, 1956) 300;
84. Henry C Lea, Superstition and Force: Torture, Ordeal, and Trial by Combat in Medieval Law (NY: Barnes & Noble Books, 1996) 81.
85. Dorothy Whitelock, English Historical Documents: 500-1042 vol 1 (Oxford: OUP, 1955) 335;
86. Trisha Olson, 'Of Enchantment: The Passing of the Ordeals and the Rise of the Jury Trial' (2000) 50 Syracuse L Rev 109, 123.
87. James Bradley Thayer, A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law-Part I Development of Trial by Jury (Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1896) 25;
88. J Laurence Laughlin, 'The Anglo-Saxon Legal Procedure' in H Adams (ed), Essays in Anglo-Saxon Law (South Hackensack, NJ: Rothman Reprints, 1972) 183, 297;
89. James Appleton Morgan (ed), William Forsyth, History of Trial by Jury (2nd edn, Jersey: Frederick D Linn, 1875) 62;
90. and W J V Windeyer, Lectures on Legal History (2nd edn, Sydney: The Law Book Co, 1957) 12.
91. R C Van Caenagem, 'Methods of Proof in Western Medieval Law' in his Legal History: A European Perspective (London: Hambledon, 1990).
92. S F C Milsom, The Legal Framework of English Feudalism (Cambridge: CUP, 1976) 76.
93. Paul R Hyams, 'Trial by Ordeal: The Key to Proof in the Early Common Law' in Morris S Arnold et al (eds), On the Laws and Customs of England -Essays in Honor of Samuel E. Thorne (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981).
94. J R Lucas, 'The Ascription of Actions', unpublished, available at .
95. William Wilson, 'Fact and Law' in Patrick Nerhot (ed), Law, Interpretation and Reality-Essays in Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Jurisprudence (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990) 11, 19.
96. Patrick Devlin, Trial by Jury (London: Methuen, 1966) 141-144.
97. Carlos E Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin, 'Limits of Logic and Legal Reasoning' in Antonio A Martino (ed), Expert Systems in Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992) 7, 16-18.
98. Clifford Geertz, Local Knowledge-Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books, 1983) at 173:
99. Alvin I Goldman, Knowledge in a Social World (Oxford: OUP, 1999).
100. Michael D Bayles, Procedural Justice-Allocating to Individuals (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990) 116-117.
101. 'What Does a Verdict Do? A Speech Act Analysis of Giving a Verdict', International Commentary on Evidence: vol 4, 2006: issue 2, article 1, available at: .
102. John R Searle, 'A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts' in K Gunderson (ed), Language, Mind, and Knowledge(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975).
103. John R Searle, Expression and Meaning-Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (Cambridge: CUP, 1979) ch 1.
104. John R Searle, Mind, Language and Society-Philosophy in The Real World (New York: Basic Books, 1998) ch 6.
105. John R Searle and Daniel Vanderveken, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic (Cambridge: CUP, 1985) 11.
106. Martin P Golding, Philosophy of Law (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1975) ch 6 ;
107. Tom R Tyler, Why People Obey the Law (New Haven: Yale UP, 1990).
108. John Searle, Mind, Language and Society (New York: Basic Books, 1998) 150.
109. D N MacCormick and Zenon Bankowski, 'Speech Acts, Legal Institutions, and Real Laws' in Neil MacCormick and Peter Birks (eds), The Legal Mind-Essays for Tony Honoré (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) 128-129;
110. Eugenio Bulygin, 'Cognition and Interpretation of Law' in L Gianformaggio and S Paulson (eds), Cognition and Interpretation of Law (Turin: Giappiachelli, 1995) 11, 19-20
111. Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967) 240:
112. Zenon Bankowski, 'The Jury and Reality' in Patrick Nerhot (ed), Law, Interpretation and Reality (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990) 236.
113. John R Searle, 'How Performatives Work' in Daniel Vanderveken and Susumu Kubo (eds), Essays in Speech Act Theory (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2001) 99-100.
114. Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, Wittgenstein and Justice (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972) 262-263;
115. Antony Duff, Lindsay Farmer, Sandra Marshall and Victor Tadros (eds), The Trial on Trial-Truth and Due Process, vol 1 (Oxford: Hart, 2004) 18.
116. Randy E Barnett, The Structure of Liberty-Justice and the Rule of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) 206:
117. Lech Morawski, 'Law, Fact and Legal Language' (1999) 18 Law and Philosophy 461, 465-466:
118. H L A Hart, 'The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights' in A G N Flew (ed), Essays on Logic and Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 1951) 145, 146.
119. Bert van Roermund, Law, Narrative and Reality-An Essay in Intercepting Politics (Dorchecht: Kluwer, 1997) ch 4.
120. John R Searle and Daniel Vanderveken, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic (Cambridge: CUP, 1985) 190.
121. Ninth Circuit: .
122. UK Crown Court Bench Book (available from the website of the Judicial Studies Board at ).
123. Margaret Gilbert, On Social Fact (London: Routledge, 1989).
124. Frederick F Schmitt, 'The Justification of Group Beliefs' in Frederick F Schmitt (ed), Socializing Epistemology-The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994) ch 12.
125. Mirjan R Damaška, Evidence Law Adrift (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997) 37-40;
126. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic and Amos Tversky (eds), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 129-152;
127. Nancy Pennington and Reid Hastie, 'The Story Model for Juror Decision Making' in Reid Hastie (ed), Inside the Juror-The Psychology of Juror Decision Making (Cambridge: CUP, 1993) 192;
128. Doron Menashe and Mutal E Shamash 'The Narrative Fallacy', International Commentary on Evidence: vol 3, 2005: issue 1, article 3, available at: at 28-29.
129. L Jonathan Cohen, An Essay on Belief and Acceptance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), at 117-125.
130. Lehrer, in 'Reason and Consistency' in Keith Lehrer (ed), Analysis and Metaphysics (Dordrecht: D Reidel Publishing, 1975) 57-58.
131. Generally, Lorraine Code, Epistemic Responsibility (Hanover: Brown University Press, 1987) 51.
132. Ronald Dworkin, 'The Model of Rules I' (1967) 35 Chicago L Rev 14, 33-34: Jonathan Cohen, 'Freedom of Proof' in William Twining (ed), Facts in Law, Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Beiheft No 16 (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1983) 1-21.
133. Louise Marcil-Lacoste, Claude Buffier and Thomas Reid-Two Common-Sense Philosophers (Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1982) 74-75.
134. 'Pass These Sirens By: Further Thoughts on Narrative and Admissibility Rules', International Commentary on Evidence: vol 5, 2007: issue 1, article 3,available at: ;
135. William Twining, 'Freedom of Proof and the Reform of Criminal Evidence' (1997) 31 Israel L Rev 439, 452.
136. John W Salmond, Jurisprudence or the Theory of Law (London: Stevens & Haynes, 1902) 597.
137. John H Langbein, Prosecuting Crime in the Renaissance (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1974) 238.
138. Lorraine Daston, Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1988) 41-43.
139. James Q Whitman, 'The Origins of "Reasonable Doubt" ' (March 1, 2005). Yale Law School. Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 1, available at: .
140. Brian Leiter, 'Prospects and Problems for the Social Epistemology of Evidence Law' in (2001) 29 Philosophical Topics 319;
141. Ronald J Allen and Brian Leiter, 'Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence' (2001) 87 Virginia L Rev 1491.
142. Mike Redmayne, 'Rationality, Naturalism and Evidence Law' (2003) 4 Michigan State L Rev 849
143. Ronald J Allen and Brian Leiter, 'Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: Reply to Redmayne' (2003) 4 Michigan State L Rev 885.
144. Larry Laudan, Truth, Error, and Criminal Law (Cambridge: CUP, 2006) 2.
145. Richard A Posner, 'Clinical and Theoretical Approaches to the Teaching of Evidence and Trial Advocacy' (2003) 21 Quinnipiac L Rev 731, 737;
146. Michael D Bayles, Principles of Law-A Normative Analysis (Dordrecht: D Reidel Publishing, 1987) 29.
147. T R S Allan, Constitutional Justice- A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001) 77-87, 112-119, 271-277;
148. 'The Concept of Fair Trial' in Elspeth Attwooll and David Goldberg (eds), Criminal Justice, Archiv Fur Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 63 (Steiner Verlag, Franz Stuttgart: 1995);
149. 'Fairness, Truth, and Silence: The Criminal Trial and the Judge's Exclusionary Discretion' in Hyman Gross and Ross Harrison (eds), Jurisprudence: Cambridge Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992);
150. T R S Allan, 'Procedural Fairness and the Duty of Respect' (1998) 18 OJLS 497;
151. Gerry Maher, 'Natural Justice as Fairness' in Neil MacCormick and Peter Birks (eds), The Legal Mind-Essays for Tony Honoré (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).
152. D J Galligan, Due Process and Fair Procedures-A Study of Administrative Procedures (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), especially 78-82, 89-95, 137-140.
153. Wigmore's terminology, 'rules of auxiliary tests and safeguards': John Henry Wigmore, A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law, vol 1 (3rd edn, Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1940) 296.
154. James Bradley Thayer, A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown and Co, 1898) 509.
155. James Bradley Thayer, 'Bedingfield's Case-Declarations as a Part of the Res Gesta' in his Legal Essays (Boston: Boston Book Company, 1908) 207, 265;
156. R W Baker, The Hearsay Rule (London: Isaac Pitman & Sons, 1950) 7.
157. William Wills, An Essay on the Principles of Circumstantial Evidence, edited by Alfred Wills (5th edn, London: Butterworth & Co, 1902) 266;
158. Alvin I Goldman, 'Epistemic Paternalism: Communication Control in Law and Society' (1991) 88 The Journal of Philosophy 113, 119.
159. Berkeley Peerage case (n 6) 415;
160. Kenneth Culp Davis, 'An Approach to Rules of Evidence in Non-Jury Cases' (1964) 50 American Bar Association J 723, 725
161. Frank R Herrmann, 'The Establishment of a Rule Against Hearsay in Romano-Canonical Procedure' (1995) 36.
162. Mirjan R Damaška, Evidence Law Adrift (New Haven: Yale UP, 1997) 3.
163. John MacArthur Maguire, Evidence-Common Sense and Common Law (Chicago: The Foundation Press, 1947) 15.
164. Edmund M Morgan, 'Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept' (1948) 62 Harvard L Rev 177, 185.
165. Richard F Rakos and Stephan Landsman, 'Researching the Hearsay Rule: Emerging Findings, General Issues, and Future Directions' (1992) 76 Minnesota L Rev 655;
166. Andrew L-T Choo, Hearsay and Confrontation in Criminal Trials (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996) 34-35
167. Paul S Milich, 'Hearsay Antinomies: The Case for Abolishing the Rule and Starting Over' (1992) 71 Oregon L Rev 723, 772.
168. Roger Park, 'A Subject Matter Approach to Hearsay Reform' (1987) 86 Michigan L Rev 51, 60-61;
169. Thomas Starkie, A Practical Treatise of the Law of Evidence (2nd edn, London: J & W T Clarke, 1833) 15-16.
170. John Henry Wigmore, A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law, vol 5 (3rd edn, Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1940) 29.
171. Michael S Pardo, 'Testimony', forthcoming in Tulane Law Review, draft available at: .
172. Catherine Z Elgin, 'Word Giving, Word Taking' in Alex Byrne, Robert Stalnaker and Ralph Wedgwood (eds), Fact and Value-Essays on Ethics and Metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001) ch 5.
173. C A J Coady, Testimony-A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992) ch 2 ;
174. Peter J Graham, 'What is Testimony?' (1997) 47 The Philosophical Quarterly 227;
175. D H Mellor, 'Telling the Truth' in D H Mellor (ed), Ways of Communicating (Cambridge: CUP, 1990) 81.
176. H P Grice, 'Utterer's Meaning and Intentions' (1969) 78 The Philosophical Rev 147, 151
177. Richard Moran, 'Getting Told and Being Believed' in Jennifer Lackey and Ernest Sosa (eds), The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford: OUP, 2006) ch 12;
178. Edward S Hinchman, 'Telling as Inviting to Trust' (2005) 70 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 562.
179. Michael Welbourne, 'The Community of Knowledge' (1981) 31 Philosophical Quarterly 302, 308-311.
180. Jennifer Lackey, 'The Nature of Testimony' (2006) 87 Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 177.
181. James F Ross, 'Testimonial Evidence' in Keith Lehrer (ed), Analysis and Metaphysics (Dordretch: R Reidel, 1975) 35, 40.
182. G E M Anscombe, 'What is it to Believe Someone?' in C F Delaney (ed), Rationality and Religious Belief (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979) 141, 144-145;
183. Michael S Pardo, 'Testimony', forthcoming in Tulane Law Review, draft available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=986845.
184. Jeffrey Pinsler, Evidence, Advocacy and the Litigation Process (Singapore: LexisNexis, 2003) 72.
185. Paul S Milich, 'Hearsay Antinomies: The Case for Abolishing the Rule and Starting Over' (1992) 71 Oregon L Rev 723, 730-732.
186. Robert Hambourger, 'Justified Assertion and the Relativity of Knowledge' (1987) 51 Philosophical Studies 241, 251-22.
187. Michael Dummett, 'Testimony and Memory' in Bimal Krishna Matilal and Arindam Chakrabarti (eds), Knowing From Words (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994) 251, 264.
188. Bernard Williams, Descartes-The Project of Pure Enquiry (London: Penguin, 1978, reprinted 1990) 44-45.
189. Elizabeth Fricker, 'Against Gullibility' in Bimal Krishna Matilal and Arindam Chakrabarti (eds), Knowing From Words (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994) 125, 147.
190. J L Austin, 'Other Minds' (1946) 20 Supplementary Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 148, 154.
191. Jonathan E Adler, 'Testimony, Trust, Knowing' (1994) 91 J of Philosophy 264, 274.
192. Peter Lipton, 'The Epistemology of Testimony' (1998) 29 Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 1, 25;
193. H H Price, Belief (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1969) 114;
194. Lorraine Code, Epistemic Responsibility (Hanover: Brown University Press, 1987) 172;
195. Christopher J Insole, 'Seeing Off the Local Threat to Irreducible Knowledge by Testimony' (2000) 50 The Philosophical Quarterly 44, especially 51.
196. Tyler Burge, 'Content Preservation' (1993) 102 The Philosophical Review 457, 468, 484;
197. John McDowell, 'Knowledge by Hearsay' in his Meaning, Knowledge and Reality (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1998) 414, 434-435.
198. David Christensen and Hilary Kornblith, 'Testimony, Memory and the Limits of the A Priori' (1997) 86 Philosophical Studies 1, 6-7.
199. Peter A French, Theodore E Uehling, Jr and Howard K Wettstein (eds), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979) 220, 227;
200. John Hardwig, 'Epistemic Dependence' (1985) 82 The Journal of Philosophy 335, particularly 344-349.
201. Jack Lyons, 'Testimony, Induction and Folk Psychology' (1997) 75 Australasian J of Philosophy 163, 170-176.
202. Hearsay in Criminal Proceedings, November 2005, available at: http://www.hkreform.gov.hk, ch 5.
203. P B Carter, 'The Hearsay Rule: Retreat or Rationalisation' in Charles Sampford and C A Bois (eds), Sir Zelman Cowen-A Life in the Law (St Leonards, New South Wales: Prospect Media, 1997) 29, 36.
204. Gregory S McNeal, 'Unfortunate Legacies: Hearsay, Ex Parte Affidavits and Anonymous Witnesses at the IHT', International Commentary on Evidence: vol 4, 2006: issue 1, article 5, available at: http://www.bepress.com/ice/vol4/iss1/art5.
205. Virginia Morris and Michael Scharf, The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, vol 1 (Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational, 1998) 13-14;
206. Hearing on Standards of Military Commissions and Tribunals, 26 July 2006, available at: http://armedservices.house.gov/comdocs/schedules/07-26-06ScharfTestimony.pdf, 3-4.
207. 'Building the Iraqi Special Tribunal-Lessons from Experiences in International Criminal Justice', June 2004, available at: http://www .usip.org/pubs/specialreports/sr122.pdf, 1.
208. Almiro Rodrigues and Cécile Tournaye, 'Hearsay Evidence' in Richard May et al (eds), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (The Hague: Kluwer, 2001) ch 23, 296-297.
209. Dominic McGoldrick, 'War Crimes Trial Before International Tribunals: Legality and Legitimacy' in R A Melikan (ed), Domestic and International Trials 1700-2000-The Trial in History, vol II (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003) ch 6, 109.
210. Former Yugoslavia, IT/32/Rev 39, 22 September 2006, available at: .
211. A D Woozley, Theory of Knowledge-An Introduction (London: Hutchinson's University Library, 1949) 184-185.
212. Nicholas Rescher, Dialectics -A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1977) 90:
213. Angus Ross, 'Why Do We Believe What We Are Told?' (1986) 28 Ratio 69, 70.
214. J L Mackie, 'The Possibility of Innate Knowledge' (1970) 70 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 245, 254.
215. Frederick Schmitt, 'On the Road to Social Epistemic Interdependence' (1988) 2 Social Epistemology 297.
216. Judicial Studies Board, Criminal Bench Book, specimen direction 1, available at: .
217. D J Birch, 'Hearsaylogic and Hearsay-fiddles: Blastland Revisited' in Peter Smith (ed), Essays in Honour of J C Smith (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1987) 24.
218. Roger C Park, 'The Hearsay Rule and the Stability of Verdicts: A Response to Professor Nesson' (1986) 70 Minnesota L Rev 1057, 1069.
219. Morgan et al, The Law of Evidence-Some Proposals for Its Reform (New Haven: Yale UP, 1927) 39; available at: .
220. Robert W Millar, 'The Formative Principles of Civil Procedure-I' (1923) 18 Illinois L Rev 1, 16-18.
221. Edmund M Morgan, 'The Hearsay Rule' (1937) 12 Washington L Rev 1, 4.
222. John L Pollock: 'Epistemology and Probability' (1983) 55 Synthese 231, 233;
223. A J Ayer, The Problem of Knowledge (London: Macmillan & Co, 1956) 28-34.
224. Stephen Guest: 'The Scope of the Hearsay Rule' (1985) 101 LQR 385, 398;
225. Glanville Williams, The Proof of Guilt (3rd edn, London: Stevens & Sons, 1963) 199.
226. A A S Zuckerman, The Principles of Criminal Evidence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989) 221:
227. C P Harvey, The Advocate's Devil (London: Stevens & Son, 1958) 79.
228. John W Salmond, Jurisprudence or the Theory of the Law (London: Stevens & Haynes, 1902) 597.
229. Jeremy Bentham, Rationale of Judicial Evidence, in John Bowring (ed), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol 7 (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843) 206.
230. William Twining, Rethinking Evidence-Exploratory Essays (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990) 1.
231. R v Handy (2002) 213 DLR (4th) 385, 405
232. R v Holtz [2003] 1 NZLR 667
233. Tan Meng Jee v PP [1996] 2 Singapore LR 422, 433
234. Azahan Bin Mohd Aminallah v Public Prosecutor [2005] 5 Malayan LJ 334, 345
235. Roderick Munday, 'Bad Character Rules and Riddles: "Explanatory Notes" and True Meaning of s 103(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003' [2004] Crim LR 533, 338-339.
236. Peter Murphy, Murphy on Evidence (9th edn, Oxford: OUP, 2005) 173;
237. R v Benguit [2005] EWCA Crim 1953 at paras 27-32.
238. Adrian Waterman and Tina Dempster, 'Bad Character: Feeling Our Way One Year On' [2006] Crim LR 614, 625.
239. Geoffrey R Stone, 'The Rules of Evidence and the Rules of Public Debate' [1993] U of Chicago Legal Forum 127, 141-142.
240. R v Boardman [1975] AC 421, 456;
241. D H Mellor, Probability-A Philosophical Introduction (London: Routledge, 2005) 73.
242. Julian V Roberts and Loretta J Stalans, Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Westview, 1997) 30-32, 191-193.
243. John Jackson and Martin Wasik, 'Character Evidence and Criminal Procedure' in David Hayton (ed), Law's Future-British Legal Development in the 21st Century (Oxford: Hart, 2000) 352-354.
244. Richard O Lempert and Stephen A Saltzburg, A Modern Approach to Evidence (2nd edn, Minnesota: West Publishing, 1982) 216-217.
245. John Henry Wigmore, A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law, vol 1 (3rd edn, Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1940) 454-456
246. Noor Mohamed v The King [1949] AC 182, 193;
247. James Landon, 'Character Evidence: Getting to the Root of the Problem Through Comparison' (1997) 24 American J of Crim L 581, 590-591.
248. Alfred Bucknill, The Nature of Evidence (London: Skeffington, 1953) 33-34.
249. Susan Marlene Davies, 'Evidence of Character to Prove Conduct: A Reassessment of Relevancy' (1991) 27 Crim L Bulletin 504, 506.
250. Lord Justice Auld, Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales (London: HMSO 2001) 566.
251. DPP v Kilbourne [1973] AC 729, 757;
252. R Jay Wallace, Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1994) 7.
253. Harry G Frankfurt's description of someone lacking 'second-order volitions': 'Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person' (1971) 68 J of Philosophy 5.
254. John A Johnson, 'Persons in Situations: Distinguishing New Wine from Old Wine in New Bottles' (1999) 13 Eur J of Personality 443, 444-445.
255. Joel J Kupperman, Character (Oxford: OUP, 1991) 59.
256. William P Alston, 'Traits, Consistency and Conceptual Alternatives for Personality Theory' (1975) 5 J of the Theory of Social Behaviour 17;
257. Richard B Brandt, 'Traits of Character: A Conceptual Analysis' (1970) 7 American Philosophical Quarterly 23;
258. Jerome C Wakefield, 'Levels of Explanation in Personality Theory' in David M Buss and Nancy Cantor (eds), Personality Psychology-Recent Trends and Emerging Directions (New York: Springer, 1989) ch 25.
259. James R Averill, 'The Dis-Position of Psychological Dispositions' (1973) 6 J of Experimental Research in Personality 275, 278-279.
260. R Harré and P F Secord, The Explanation of Social Behaviour (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1972) 30.
261. Thomas Nagel, The View From Nowhere (New York: OUP, 1986) 121.
262. David M Buss and Kenneth H Craik, 'The Act Frequency Approach to Personality' (1983) 90 Psychological Rev 105, 107.
263. Joel Feinberg, Harm to Others (Oxford: OUP, 1984) at 199.
264. Joel Feinberg, 'Autonomy' in John Christman (ed), The Inner Citadel-Essays on Individual Autonomy (Oxford: OUP, 1989) 34.
265. Gerald Dworkin, 'Autonomy and Behaviour Control' (1976) 6 Hastings Center Report 23, 25.
266. Stuart Hampshire, Freedom of the Individual (London: Chatto & Windus, 1975) at 142.
267. Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology, translated by Hazel E Barnes (London: Methuen, 1957) 64.
268. R A Duff, Trials and Punishments (Cambridge: CUP, 1986) 131.
269. Michele Moody-Adams, 'On the Old Saw That Character Is Destiny' in Owen Flanagan and Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds), Identity, Character, and Morality-Essays in Moral Psychology (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1990) ch 5.
270. Rachana Kamtekar, 'Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character' (2004) 114 Ethics 458, 477.
271. Jonathan Webber, 'Virtue, Character and Situation' (2006) 3 J of Moral Philosophy 193.
272. Jack Block, 'Critique of the Act Frequency Approach to Personality' (1989) 56 J of Personality and Social Psychology 234, 238.
273. Colin Tapper, 'Trends and Techniques in the Law of Evidence' in Peter Birks (ed), Criminal Justice and Human Rights (Oxford: OUP, 1995) 29;
274. Lawrence Blum, 'Stereotypes and Stereotyping: A Moral Analysis' (2004) 33 Philosophical Papers 251, 262-263.
275. J R Spencer, 'Evidence' in Mireille Delmas-Marty and J R Spencer (eds), European Criminal Procedures (Cambridge: CUP, 2002) ch 11 at 616.
276. UN Security Council and General Assembly by the ICTY, 29 August 1994, para 76, available at: http://www.un.org/icty/rappannu-e/1994/AR94e .pdf>.
277. Richard O Lempert, Samuel R Gross and James S Liebman, A Modern Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, Transcripts and Cases (3rd edn, St Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing, 2000) 329
278. Colin Tapper (ed), Cross and Tapper on Evidence (9th edn, London: Butterworths, 1999) 381;
279. Rosemary Pattenden, 'The Discretionary Exclusion of Relevant Evidence in English Civil Proceedings' (1997) 1 Intl J of Evidence and Proof 361, 367.
280. John Peysner, 'Being Civil to Similar Fact Evidence' (1993) Civil Justice Quarterly 188, 189.
281. Rachana Kamtekar, 'Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character' (2004) 114 Ethics 458, 475-476.
282. Robert A Margolis, 'Evidence of Similar Facts, the Evidence Act, and the Judge of Law as Trier-of-fact' (1988) 9 Singapore L Rev 103, 106-107.
283. Herbert L Packer, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1968) 157.
284. A P Simester and W J Brookbanks, Principles of Criminal Law (2nd edn, Wellington: Brookers, 2002) 2-5.
285. Ronald Dworkin, 'Hard Cases' in Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1991) 81, 100
286. John H Langbein, The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003) 191.
287. Alex Stein, Foundations of Evidence Law(Oxford: OUP, 2005) 14;
288. Henry L Chambers Jr, 'Reasonable Certainty and Reasonable Doubt' (1998) 81 Marquette L Rev 655, 656-657, 700;
289. Jon O Newman, 'Beyond "Reasonable Doubt"' (1993) 68 New York U L Rev 979, 981;
290. James Fitzjames Stephen, A History of the Criminal Law of England, vol 1 (London: Macmillan & Co, 1883) 354.
291. Carleton Kemp Allen, 'The Presumption of Innocence' in his Legal Duties -And Other Essays in Jurisprudence(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931) 273.
292. Home Office Online Report 05/04 (2004) at 38, available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/rdsolr0504.pdf.
293. Stephen E Fienberg, The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in the Courts (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989) 201-204;
294. Joseph L Gastwirth, Statistical Reasoning in Law and Public Policy: Tort Law, Evidence and Health (Boston: Academic Press, 1988) 700-702;
295. Larry Laudan, Truth, Error, and Criminal Law (Cambridge: CUP, 2006) 77-78.
296. Frederick Schauer and Richard Zeckhauser, 'On the Degree of Confidence for Adverse Decisions' (1996) 25 J of Legal Studies 27, 33-34;
297. Harry D Saunders, 'Quantifying Reasonable Doubt: A Proposed Solution to an Equal Protection Problem' (December 7, 2005) Bepress Legal Series, Working Paper 881, available at: http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/881/;
298. Peter Tiller and Jonathan Gottfried, 'United States v Copeland, 369 F Supp 2d 275 (EDNY 2005):
299. William Wills, An Essay on the Principles of Circumstantial Evidence, edited by Alfred Wills (5th edn, London: Butterworth & Co, 1902) 9.
300. James Fitzjames Stephen, A General View of the Criminal Law of England (London: Macmillan & Co, 1863) 262.
301. James Fitzjames Stephen, 'The Characteristics of English Criminal Law' (1857) Cambridge Essays 1, 27.
302. Herbert L Packer, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1968) 137.
303. Barbara Shapiro, Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Probable Cause-Historical Perspectives on Anglo-American Law of Evidence (Berkeley: U of California Press, 1991) 220.
304. William Paley, The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy (Dublin: Exshaw et al, 1785) 318.
305. W M Best, A Treatise on Presumptions of Law and Fact with the Theory and Rules of Presumptive or Circumstantial Proof in Criminal Cases (London: Hodges and Smith, 1844) 291.
306. Samuel Romilly, Observations on the Criminal Law of England as it Relates to Capital Punishments, and on the Mode in which it is Administered (London: T Cadell & W Davies, 1810) 72-76.
307. Jeffrie G Murphy, 'The Killing of the Innocent' in his Retribution, Justice, and Therapy-Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Dordrecht: D Reidel, 1979) 18.
308. Glanville Williams, The Proof of Guilt (3rd edn, London: Stevens & Sons, 1963) 190;
309. Michael Philips, 'The Inevitability of Punishing the Innocent' (1985) 48 Philosophical Studies 389;
310. R A Duff, Trials and Punishments (Cambridge: CUP, 1986) 159.
311. Carleton Kemp Allen, 'The Presumption of Innocence', in his Legal Duties -And Other Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931) 253, 287.
312. John Dewey, How We Think-A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process (Boston: D C Heath, 1933) 16.
313. John Henry Wigmore, A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law, vol 9 (3rd edn, Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1940) 325.
314. James Fitzjames Stephen, A General View of the Criminal Law of England (London: Macmillan & Co, 1863) 245.
315. John David Owens, 'Does Belief Have an Aim?' (2003) 115 Philosophical Studies 283, 288.
316. Gilbert Harman, 'Practical Aspects of Theoretical Reasoning' in Alfred R Mele and Piers Rawling (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality(Oxford: OUP, 2004) ch 3, 45.
317. M Jamie Ferreira, Scepticism and Reasonable Doubt-The British Naturalist Tradition in Wilkins, Hume, Reid, and Newman (Oxford: OUP, 1986) 21, 53-54, 72, 183-186;
318. H J McCloskey, 'A Note on Utilitarian Punishment' (1963) 72 Mind 599;
319. J J C Smart and Bernard Williams, Utilitarianism-For and Against (Cambridge: CUP, 1973) 98.
320. H J McCloskey, 'An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism' (1957) 66 The Philosophical Rev 466, 468-469.
321. James Fitzjames Stephen, A History of the Criminal Law of England (London: Macmillan & Co, 1883) 260.
322. C L Ten, Crime, Guilt and Punishment (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987) at 32-36.
323. Daniel Dennett (ed), The Philosophical Lexicon, available at: http://www.blackwellpublishing .com/lexicon/#O:
324. Raimond Gaita, A Common Humanity-Thinking about Truth, Love and Justice (London: Routledge, 2000) 51.
325. Judith N Shklar, The Faces of Injustice (New Haven: Yale UP, 1990) 90.
326. H J McCloskey, 'The Complexity of the Concepts of Punishment' (1962) 37 Philosophy 307, 319-320.
327. A P Simester and W J Brookbanks, Principles of Criminal Law (2nd edn, Wellington: Brookers, 2002) 4:
328. Michael Bayles, 'Principles for Legal Procedure' (1986) 5 Law and Philosophy 33, 48, Trevor Grove, The Juryman's Tale (London: Bloomsbury, 1998) 150.
329. Gilbert Harman, Reasoning, Meaning and Mind (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999) 102.
330. David Annis, 'A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification' (1978) 15 American Philosophical Quarterly 213, 214.
331. Stewart Cohen, 'How to be a Fallibilist' (1988) 2 Philosophical Perspectives: Epistemology 91, 111.
332. Robert Nozick, Philosophical Explanations (Oxford: Clarendon, 1981) 204-211.
333. Keith DeRose, 'Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense' in John Greco and Ernest Sosa (eds), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999) ch 8;
334. Michael Brady and Duncan Pritchard, 'Epistemological Contextualism: Problems and Prospects' (2005) 55 The Philosophical Quarterly 161;
335. Keith Lehrer, 'Sensitivity, Indiscernibility and Knowledge' (2000) 10 Philosophical Issues 33, 33-34.
336. Wayne A Davis, 'Are Knowledge Claims Indexical?' (2004) 61 Erkenntnis 257-281;
337. Brian Weatherson, 'Questioning Contextualism' in Stephen Hetherington (ed), Aspects of Knowing-Epistemological Essays (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006) ch 9.
338. Contrast Jason Stanley, 'On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism' (2004) 119 Philosophical Studies 119, 123-130.
339. Stewart Cohen, 'Contextualism Defended' in Matthias Steup and Ernest Sosa (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005) 56, 61-62.
340. Ralph Wedgwood, 'Contextualism about Justified Belief', forthcoming, draft available from his webpage: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mert1230/papers.htm.
341. Jason Stanley, Knowledge and Practical Interests (Oxford: OUP, 2005) ch 5.
342. Ralph Wedgwood, 'Contextualism about Justified Belief', forthcoming, draft available from his webpage: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mert1230/papers.htm.
343. Jason Stanley, Knowledge and Practical Interests (Oxford: OUP, 2005) ch 5.
344. Jeremy Fantl and Matthew McGrath, 'Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification' (2002) The Philosophical Review 67.
345. Brian Weatherson, 'Can We Do Without Pragmatic Encroachment?' (2005) 19 Philosophical Perspectives 417, 434-436.
346. Keith DeRose, 'The Problem with Subject-Sensitive Invariantism' (2004) 68 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 346, 347.
347. Damian Cox and Michael Levine, 'Believing Badly' (2004) 33 Philosophical Papers 209, 222, 223.
348. J L Austin, 'Other Minds' in J O Urmson and G J Warnock (eds), J L Austin, Philosophical Papers (3rd edn, Oxford: OUP, 1979) 76, 108.
349. Michael Slote, 'Caring Versus the Philosophers' (1999) Yearbook of the Philosophy of Education, available at: http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/1999/slote.asp (29 August 2005).
350. Nel Noddings, 'Two Concepts of Caring' (1999) Yearbook of the Philosophy of Education, available at: http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PESYearbook/1999/noddings.asp (29 August 2005).
351. James Q Whitman, 'The Origins of "Reasonable Doubt"' (March 1, 2005). Yale Law School. Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 1. http://lsr.nellco.org/yale/fss/papers/1
352. J R Lucas, On Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980) 7.
353. Lord Justice Auld, Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales (London: HMSO, 2001) 173-176.
354. 'Burden of Proof', retrieved on 12 October 2005 from Encyclopaedia Britannica Premium Service: http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109441).
355. Theodore Waldman, 'Origing of the Legal Doctrine of Reasonable Doubt' (1959) 20 Journal of the History of Ideas 299, 306-307;
356. M Jamie Ferreira, Scepticism and Reasonable Doubt-The British Naturalist Tradition in Wilkins, Hume, Reid, and Newman (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) 34
357. Rosemary Pattenden, 'The Risk of Non-Persuasion in Civil Trials: The Case Against a Floating Standard of Proof' [1988] Civil Justice Quarterly 220, 230-231.
358. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously(London: Duckworth, 1977) 227.
359. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously(London: Duckworth, 1977) 227.
360. Ronald Dworkin, 'Principle, Policy, Procedure' in his A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1985) ch 3, 89.
361. Dale A Nance, 'Civility and the Burden of Proof' (1994) 17 Harvard J of Law and Public Policy 647, 653.
362. William Wills, An Essay on the Principles of Circumstantial Evidence, edited by Alfred Wills (6th edn, London: Butterworth, 1912) 304-305.
363. Ronald Dworkin, 'Hard Cases' in his Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977) 100.
364. J W Harris, Legal Philosophies (2nd edn, London: Butterworths, 1997) 201.
365. Stuart Hampshire, Justice is Conflict (Princeton: Princeton UP, 2000) xiii.
366. Ernest Gellner, Legitimation of Belief (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974) 27.
367. Frederick Pollock, Essays in the Law (London: MacMillan & Co, 1922) 275.
368. Henry Sumner Maine, Village Communities in the East and West-with Other Lectures, Addresses, and Essays (7th edn, London: John Murray, 1895) 302.
369. Edmund M Morgan, 'Suggested Remedy For Obstructions to Expert Testimony by Rules of Evidence' (1942-43) 10 University of Chicago L Rev 285, 285.
370. Zechariah Chafee, Jr, Book Review of A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law (2nd ed) by John Henry Wigmore (1924) 37 Harvard L Rev 513, 519.
371. Trevor Grove, The Juryman's Tale (London: Bloomsbury, 1998).
372. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic and Amos Tversky (eds), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
373. Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin and Daniel Kahneman, Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement (Cambridge: CUP, 2002).
374. Michael Williams, Problems of Knowledge-A Critical Introduction to Epistemology (Oxford: OUP, 2001) 38.
375. Michael P Lynch, True to Life-Why Truth Matters (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2004) 10-11, 22.
376. Haack, 'Reflections on Relativism: From Momentous Tautology to Seductive Contradiction' in Haack (n 17) ch 9, 149-166.
377. Alvin I Goldman, Knowledge in a Social World (Oxford: OUP, 1999) ch 1 ;
378. Nicolson argues: 'Truth, Reason and Justice: Epistemology and Politics in Evidence Discourse' (1994) 57 MLR 726, 729-734.
379. Zenon Bankowski, 'The Value of Truth: Fact Scepticism Revisited' (1981) 1 LS 257, 260.
380. Jerome Frank, Courts on Trial-Myth and Reality in American Justice (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1973 ed) 35-36;
381. D J Galligan, Due Process and Fair Procedures-A Study of Administrative Procedures (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996) 5.
382. Susan Haack, 'Truth, Truths, "Truth" and "Truths" in the Law' (2003) 26 Harvard J of L and Public Policy 17, 19:
383. A D Woozley, Theory of Knowledge-An Introduction (London: Hutchinson's University Library, 1949) 133-134;
384. John Searle, Mind, Language and Society (New York: Basic Books, 1998) 5.
385. D N MacCormick, 'The Coherence of a Case and The Reasonableness of Doubt' (1980) 2 Liverpool L Rev 45;
386. Nicholas Rescher, Plausible Reasoning-An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Plausibilistic Inference (Amsterdam: Van Gorcum, 1976);
387. John R Josephson and Susan G Josephson, Abductive Inference-Computation, Philosophy, Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994) ch 1.
388. Alfred Schutz, Reflections on the Problem of Relevance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970) 136.
389. Charles Nesson, 'The Evidence or the Event? On Judicial Proof and the Acceptability of Verdicts' (1985) 98 Harvard L Rev 1357.
390. Carl F Carnor, 'Daubert and the Acceptability of Legal Decisions' (2005) 5
391. J of Philosophy, Science and Law, available at: www.psljournal. com/archives/all/cranor.cfm.
392. John T McNaughton, 'Some Aspects of Evidence and Inference in the Law' in Daniel Lerner (ed), Evidence and Inference (Illinois: The Free Press, 1958) 48, 52-53.
393. Ronald J Allen, 'Rationality, Mythology, and the "Acceptability of Verdicts" Thesis' (1986) 66 Boston L Rev 541;
394. Neil B Cohen, 'The Costs of Acceptability: Blue Buses, Agent Orange, and Aversion to Statistical Evidence' (1986) 66 Boston L Rev 563;
395. Roger C Park, 'The Hearsay Rule and the Stability of Verdicts: A Response to Professor Nesson' (1986) 70 Minnesota L Rev 1057.
396. Bernard Williams, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy (Princeton: Princeton UP, 2002) 210.
397. Ota Weinberger, 'Legal Validity, Acceptance of Law, Legitimacy. Some Critical Comments and Constructive Proposals' (1999) 12 Ratio Juris 336, 346.
398. R W Fox, Justice in the Twenty-First Century (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2000) 10.
399. Max Rheinstein, Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1954) 228.
400. John H Langbein, The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford: OUP, 2003) 1.
401. David P Derham, 'Truth and the Common Law Judicial Process' (1963) 5 Malaya L Rev 338, at 344-349;
402. Louis Waller (ed), Derham, Maher and Waller, An Introduction to Law (7th edn Sydney: LBC Information Services, 1995) ch 10.
403. A W Brian Simpson, general introduction to John H Langbein, The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford: OUP, 2003) v.
404. Robert S Summers, 'Formal Legal Truth and Substantive Truth in Judicial Fact-Finding-Their Justified Divergence in Some Particular Cases' (1999) 18 Law and Philosophy 497, 506.
405. John H Langbein, Torture and the Law of Proof (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1977).
406. Lord Devlin, 'Who is at Fault When Injustice Occurs?' in Lord Devlin et al, What's Wrong with the Law? (London: BBC, 1970) 71.
407. George Schedler, 'Can Retributivists Support Legal Punishment' (1980) 63 The Monist 51, 191:
408. R A Duff, Trials and Punishments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986) 107-108;
409. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (revised edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999) 75.
410. Ronald Dworkin, 'Principle, Policy, Procedure' in A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1985) ch 3.
411. Edmund M Morgan, 'Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept' (1948) 62 Harvard L Rev 177, at 184-185.
412. R F Alfred Hoernlé, 'Notes on Professor J S Mackenzie's Theory of Belief, Judgment and Knowledge' (1918) 27 The Philosophical Review 513, 515.
413. (Remark made on 29 June 2007 in his blog: http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2007/06/spencer-on-wron.html.)
414. R W Fox, 'Expediency and Truth-Finding in the Modern Law of Evidence' in Enid Campbell and Louis Waller (eds), Well and Truly Tried-Essays on Evidence in Honour of Sir Richard Eggleston (Sydney: Law Book Co, 1982) 175;
415. Alfred Bucknill, The Nature of Evidence (London: Skeffington, 1953) 70, 76-77.
416. Chaim Perelman, 'Justice and Reasoning' in his Law, Reason and Justice: Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Graham Hughes (New York University, 1969)
417. Richard C C Peck, 'The Adversarial System: A Qualified Search for the Truth' (2001) 80 Canadian Bar Rev 456;
418. D J Galligan, 'The Right of Silence Reconsidered' [1988] CLP 69, 88-91;
419. Robert S Gerstein, 'Privacy and Self-Incrimination' (1970) 80 Ethics 87.
420. Edward N Zalta (ed), online: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato .stanford.edu/archives/spr2005/entries/justep-intext/.
421. Ralph Wedgwood, 'Contextualism about Justified Belief', forthcoming, available at his website: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mert1230/papers.htm.
422. Jonathan Sutton, Without Justification (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2007) 14-41.
423. Richard Feldman, 'Good Arguments' in Frederick F Schmitt (ed), Socializing Epistemology-The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 1994) ch 8, 176-179.
424. Stewart Cohen, 'Knowledge and Context' (1986) 83 J of Philosophy 574, 577.
425. David B Annis, 'A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification' (1978) 15 American Philosophical Quarterly 213, 217;
426. Jules L Coleman, 'Rational Choice and Rational Cognition' (1997) 3 Legal Theory 183, 186-187.
427. Kent Bach, 'A Rationale for Reliabilism' (1985) 68 The Monist 246, 256;
428. Roderick Firth, 'Are Epistemic Concepts Reducible to Ethical Concepts?' in Alvin I Goldman and Jaegwon Kim (eds), Values and Morals-Essays in Honor of William Frankena, Charles Stevenson, and Richard Brandt (Dordrecht: D Reidel, 1978) 215, 218.
429. Tyler Burge, 'Content Preservation' (1993) 102 The Philosophical Review 457, 458-459.
430. David B Annis, 'A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification' (1978) 15 American Philosophical Quarterly 213, 217;
431. Wilfred Sellars, Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963) 169.
432. John Dewey, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, edited by Jo Ann Boydston (Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1991) 174.
433. Larry Laudan, Truth, Error, and Criminal Law (Cambridge: CUP, 2006) 42-43.
434. Robert Burns, 'The Distinctiveness of Trial Narrative' in Antony Duff, Lindsay Farmer, Sandra Marshall and Victor Tadros (eds), The Trial on Trial-Truth and Due Process, vol 1 (Oxford: Hart, 2004) ch 9, 162.
435. Jonathan Adler, Belief's Own Ethics (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2002) 87.
436. Paul Helm, Belief Policies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994) 21;
437. Angus Ross, 'Why Do We Believe What We Are Told?' (1986) 28 Ratio 69, 83-84;
438. Catherine Z Elgin, 'Word Giving, Word Taking' in Alex Byrne, Robert Stalnaker, and Ralph Wedgwood (eds), Fact and Value-Essays on Ethics and Metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2001) 106;
439. Keith Lehrer, 'Personal and Social Knowledge' (1987) 73 Synthese 87, 88-89.
440. Ronald J Allen and Gerald T G Seniuk, 'Two Puzzles of Juridical Proof' (1997) 76 Canadian Bar Rev 65, 78.
441. Eugene Kamenka, 'What is Justice?' in Eugene Kamenka and Alice Erh-Soon Tay (eds), Justice (London: Edward Arnold, 1979) 14.
442. David Resnick, 'Due Process and Procedural Justice' in J Roland Pennock and John W Chapman (eds), Due Process, Nomos XVIII (New York: New York University Press, 1977) 212-214;
443. T R S Allan, Constitutional Justice-A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001) 206, 77-87;
444. Ian Dennis, The Law of Evidence (3rd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007) 49-58;
445. Andrew L T Choo, Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays of Criminal Proceedings (Oxford: OUP, 1993) 13-14;
446. R A Duff, 'The Limits of Virtue Jurisprudence' in Michael Brady and Duncan Pritchard (eds), Moral and Epistemic Virtues (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003) 199, 205.
447. Raimond Gaita, A Common Humanity: Thinking about Love and Truth and Justice (London: Routledge, 2000) 81.
448. Markus Dirk Dubber, The Sense of Justice-Empathy in Law and Punishment (NY: NYU Press, 2006) 148.
449. Michael Slote, The Ethics of Care and Empathy (London: Routledge, 2007) 94.
450. Ronald Dworkin, 'Principle, Policy, Procedure' in his A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1985) ch 3, 80.
451. Lawrence Blum, 'Compassion' in Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed), Explaining Emotions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980) ch 21, 509-513.