Introduction: Towards a Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial

The Trial on Trial Volume 1: Truth and Due Process

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-28

  Duff, Antony ^a   Farmer, Lindsay ^b   Marshall, Sandra ^a   Tadros, Victor ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187365952     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Lord Justice Auld, Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales (hereafter Auld report; London, HMSO, 2001; http://www.criminal-courts-review.org.uk).
2. Justice for All (London, Home Office, 2002; http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk).
3. Cf Lord Woolf, Access to Justice (London, Department for Constitutional Affairs, 1996; http://www.dca.gov.uk/civil/final
4. Lord Bonomy, Improving Practice. 2002 Review of the Practices and Procedure of the High Court of Justiciary (Edinburgh, Scottish Executive, 2002; http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/justice/rppj-00.asp).
5. White Paper: Modernising Justice in Scotland (Edinburgh, Scottish Executive, 2003; http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/justice/mjis-00.asp).
6. S Doran and J Jackson (eds), The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2000).
7. M McConville and G Wilson (eds), The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002).
8. P Duff, ‘The Defendant’s Right to Trial by Jury: A Neighbour’s View’[2000] Criminal Law Review 85.
9. L Ellison, The Adversarial Process and the Vulnerable Witness (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001).
10. J McEwan, ‘Special Measures for Witnesses and Victims’ in M McConville & G Wilson (eds), The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002).
11. M Redmayne, ‘The Relevance of Bad Character’ (2002) 61 Cambridge Law Journal 684.
12. Report of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, Cmnd 4262-1 (London, HMSO, 1999).
13. Law Commission, Double Jeopardy and Prosecution Appeals (No 267; London, HMSO, 2001); Auld report, ch 12, paras 47-65.
14. J Jackson, ‘Modes of Trial: Shifting the Balance towards the Professional Judge’ [2002] Criminal Law Review 249.
15. A J Ashworth, Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2002).
16. Human Rights Act 1998. The Act came into force in Scotland one year earlier as a consequence of the Scotland Act 1998 s 57(2).
17. G Maher, ‘Human Rights and the Criminal Process’ in T Campbell, D Goldberg, S McLean and T Mullen (eds), Human Rights. From Rhetoric to Reality (Oxford, Blackwell, 1986), 197
18. R Buxton, ‘The Human Rights Act and the Substantive Criminal Law’ [2000] Criminal Law Review 331.
19. P Darbyshire ‘The Lamp that Shows that Freedom Lives’ [1991] Criminal Law Review 740.
20. A J Ashworth, The Criminal Process: An Evaluative Study (2nd edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998)
21. R Allen ‘Alternatives to Prosecution’ in M McConville and G Wilson, P Duff, ‘The Prosecutor Fine’ (1994) 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 565-87.
22. R D Mackay, ‘Mentally Abnormal Offenders: Disposal and Criminal Responsibility Issues’ In McConville and Wilson, C Cobley, A Kip, ‘Witness Evidence, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Principle of Open Justice’ in Fennell, 287.
23. J Winterdyk, Juvenile Justice Systems: International Perspectives (2nd edn, Toronto, Canadian Scholars Press, 2002).
24. R A Duff, Punishing Juveniles: Principle and Critique (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002).
25. P Bean, ‘America’s Drug Courts: A New Development in Criminal Justice’ [1996] Criminal Law Review 718
26. H Strang and J Braithwaite, Restorative Justice and Family Violence (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002).
27. G Johnstone, A Restorative Justice Reader: Texts, sources, context (Cullompton, Willan, 2003).
28. J Baldwin and M McConville, Negotiated Justice (London, Martin Robertson, 1977)
29. M McConville, ‘Plea Bargaining’ In McConville and Wilson, C Cobley, A Kip, ‘Witness Evidence, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Principle of Open Justice’ in Fennell, 287.
30. M McConville, L Bridges, J Hodgson and A Pavlovic Standing Accused (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994) 188.
31. McConville and Wilson C Cobley, A Kip, ‘Witness Evidence, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Principle of Open Justice’ In Fennell, 287.
32. McConville, Bridges, Hodgson & Pavolivic, Standing Accused (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994) 188.
33. McConville, ‘Plea Bargaining: Ethics and Politics’ (1998) 25 Journal of Law & Society 562.
34. M McConville, A Sanders and R Leng, The Case for the Prosecution (London, Routledge, 1991)
35. D McBarnet, Conviction (London, Macmillan, 1981).
36. A Sanders, ‘Prosecution Systems’ In McConville and Wilson, C Cobley, A Kip, ‘Witness Evidence, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Principle of Open Justice’ in Fennell, 287.
37. S E Marshall, ‘Victims of Crime: Their Station and its Duties’ in M Matravers (ed), Managing Modernity: Politics and the Culture of Control (Routledge, forthcoming).
38. McConville, ‘Plea Bargaining’, C Cobley, A Kip, ‘Witness Evidence, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Principle of Open Justice’ in Fennell, 287.
39. Baldwin and McConville, C Cobley, A Kip, ‘Witness Evidence, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Principle of Open Justice’ in Fennell, 287.
40. McConville, Bridges, Hodgson and Pavlovic, C Cobley, A Kip, ‘Witness Evidence, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Principle of Open Justice’ in Fennell, 287.
41. McConville, ‘Plea Bargaining’, C Cobley, A Kip, ‘Witness Evidence, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Principle of Open Justice’ in Fennell, 287,369-372.
42. P Pettit and J Braithwaite, Not Just Deserts: a Republican Theory of Criminal Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1990).
43. J H Langbein, ‘Controlling Prosecutorial Discretion in Germany’, (1974) 41 University of Chicago Law Review 439
44. M Dubber, ‘American Plea Bargains, German Lay Judges, and the Crisis of Criminal Procedure’ (1997) 49 Stanford Law Review 547.
45. M Dubber, ‘American Plea Bargains, German Lay Judges, and the Crisis of Criminal Procedure’ (1997) 49 Stanford Law Review 547.
46. J Herrmann, ‘The Rule of Compulsory Prosecution and the Scope of Prosecutorial Discretion in Germany’ (1974) 41 University of Chicago Law Review 468.
47. A J Ashworth, ‘Responsibilities, Rights and Restorative Justice’ (2002) 42 British Journal of Criminology 578.
48. J Jaconelli, ‘What is a Trial’ in M Mulholland and B Pullan (eds), Judicial Tribunals in England and Europe, 1200-1700: the Trial in History, vol I (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2003) 18.
49. J Raz, The Authority of Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979) 153-59.
50. Law Commission, Double Jeopardy and Prosecution Appeals (No 267; London, HMSO, 2001) para 7.12
51. A J Ashworth, ‘Concepts of Criminal Justice’ [1979] Criminal Law Review 412 at 412
52. J J C Smart, ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’ in Smart and B Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1973) 1, 69-72.
53. R M Hare, Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1981)
54. R M Dworkin, ‘Principle, Policy, Procedure’ in C F H Tapper (ed), Crime, Proof, and Punishment (London, Butterworths, 1981) 193.
55. H L A Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1968) 1-27.
56. R Nozick, Philosophical Explanations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1981) 28-29
57. Braithwaite and Pettit, Not Just Deserts: a Republican Theory of Criminal Justice(Oxford, Oxford University Press,1990).26-36.
58. H Packer, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1968)
59. Ashworth, The Criminal Process:An Evaluative Study (2nd edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press,1998),26-28.
60. W R LaFave, J H Israel, N J King, Criminal Procedure (3rd edn, St Paul Minnesota, West Publishing, 2000).
61. Ashworth, The Criminal Process:An Evaluative Study (2nd edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press,1998),30-40
62. G Maher, ‘Balancing Rights and Interests in the Criminal Process’ in R A Duff and N E Simmonds (eds), Philosophy and the Criminal Law (Stuttgart, Franz Steiner, 1984) 99.
63. N Lacey, State Punishment (London, Routledge, 1988) 46-56
64. J Morison, ‘Hart’s Excuse A J Ashworth, ‘Exploring the Integrity Principle in Evidence and Procedure’ in P Mirfield R Smith (eds), Essays for Colin Tapper (London, Butterworths, 2003), 107
65. H Dennis, ‘Reconstructing the Law of Criminal Evidence’ (1989) 42 Current Legal Problems 21, on the idea of the ‘legitimacy’ of the verdict.
66. R A Duff, Trials and Punishments (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986)