The Distinctiveness of Trial Narrative

The Trial on Trial Volume 1: Truth and Due Process

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 157-177

  Burns, Robert ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646022515     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. R Burns, A Theory of the Trial (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999).
2. J White, From Expectation to Experience: Essays on Law and Legal Education (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1999) 108.
3. H L A Hart, The Concept of Law (2nd ed, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994) 239-41
4. R Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Cambridge, Belknap Press, 1986) 90.
5. J Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1971) 579.
6. C Geertz, ‘From the Native’s Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding’ In P Rabinow and W Sullivan (eds), Interpretive Social Science: A Reader (Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1979) 239.
7. L Farmer, ‘Whose Trial Comments on A Theory of the Trial’ (2003) 28 Law and Social Inquiry 547
8. R Burns, ‘A Response to Four Readings of A Theory of the Trial’ (2003) 28 Law and Social Inquiry 553.
9. A MacIntyre, Whose Justice Which Rationality (Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1988) 349-69
10. D Luban, Legal Modernism (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1994) 206
11. Burns, A Theory of the Trial (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999), at 4-5, 201-219.
12. P Steinberger, The Concept of Political Judgment (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1993).
13. H Arendt, On Revolution (New York, Viking, 1965) 196.
14. D Kolb, The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger and After (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1986).
15. A Scalia, ‘The Rule of Law as Law of Rules’ (1989) 56 University of Chicago Law Review 1175.
16. Hart, The Concept of Law (2nd ed, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994) 239-241
17. Burns, A Theory of the Trial (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999) 124-54.
18. L Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, trans G E M Anscombe (New York, Macmillan, 1953) 50.
19. R Burns, ‘Law and Rhetoric’, In W Jost and W Olmstead (eds), A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism (Oxford, Blackwell, 2004).
20. G Warnke, Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1987) 58.
21. P Ricoeur, The Rule of Metaphor: Multidisciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language,(Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1975) 10-11
22. M Nussbaum, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986) 390.
23. S Wolin, ‘Political Theory as a Vocation’ in M Fleischer (ed), Machiavelli and the Nature of Political Thought (New York, Atheneum, 1972) 44-45.
24. I Murdoch, The Sovereignty of Good (London, Routledge, 1970) 89.
25. A MacIntyre, After Virtue (2nd edn, Notre Dame, Notre Dame University Press, 1984) 215.
26. H Pitkin, Wittgenstein and Justice (Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1972).
27. Burns, A Theory of the Trial (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999). 190.
28. W Bennett and M Feldman, Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture (New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1981) 5.
29. J Mandler, Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory (Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1984).
30. H Kalven and H Zeisel, The American Jury (Boston, Little Brown, 1966) 6-7.
31. J Bruner, Acts of Meaning (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1990) 47.
32. D Carr, Time, Narrative, and History (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1986) 50.
33. D Carr, Time, Narrative, and History (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1986) 50.
34. L Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus,(London, Routledge, 1961) 522.
35. Bruner, Acts of Meaning (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1990) 47, 39-40.
36. T Kuhn, ‘Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice’ In T Kuhn, The Essential Tension:Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1977).
37. G Steiner, Real Presences (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989) 82-83.
38. S Hampshire, ‘Public and Private Morality’ In S Hampshire (ed), Public and Private Morality (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1978).
39. W Burke, R Poulson, and M Brondino, ‘Fact or Fiction: The Effect of Opening Statement’ (1992) 18 Journal of Contemporary Law 195.
40. Bennett and Feldman, Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture (New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1981) 5,10.
41. P Kemp, ‘Ethics and Narrativity’, In L E Hahn (ed), The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur (Chicago, Open Court, 1995) 371, 376.
42. H White, ‘The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality’ In W Mitchell (ed), On Narrative (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1981) 13-14.
43. H White, ‘The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality’ In W Mitchell (ed), On Narrative (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1981) 13-14.
44. P Ricoeur, Time and Narrative (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1988) 249.
45. Aristotle, Rhetoric 1414.
46. C Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1989).
47. R Beiner, Political Judgment (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1983) 18.
48. M Hill, ‘The Fictions of Mankind and the Stories of Men’ in M Hill (ed), Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World (New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1979).
49. A de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, trans H Reeve (New York, Vintage Books, 1945) 295.
50. Bruner, Acts of Meaning (Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press, 1990) 47.
51. S Hampshire, Justice is Conflict (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2000).
52. Burns, A Theory of the Trial (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999). 211-219.
53. Chicago, B & Q Railway Co v Babcock, 204 US 585, 598 (1907).
54. Burns, A Theory of the Trial (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999). 210-211.