Foundations of Evidence Law

Foundations of Evidence Law

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-264

  Stein, Alex ^a  

^a YESHIVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Allocating risk; Anglo American legal systems; Conditions of uncertainty; Evidentiary rules; Fact finding; Maximal individualization; Risk of error; Truth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922785641     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198257363.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (384)

1. Albert O. Hirschman, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (1970) (developing the 'Voice', 'exit', and 'loyalty' mechanism).
2. Ronald Dworkin, A Matter of Principle (1986), pp. 72, 82-9.
3. Sven Ove Hansson, Ethical Criteria for Risk Acceptance (2003) 59 Erkenntnis 291, 305.
4. Lochner v New York, 198 U.S. 45, 76 (1905).
5. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (1977), pp. 46-130;.
6. Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire (1986), pp. 176-238.
7. Robert G. Bone, Agreeing to Fair Process: the Problem with Contractarian Theories of Procedural fairness (2003) 83 B. U. L. Rev. 485, 495-542.
8. Lawrence B. Solum, Procedural Justice (2004) 78 So. Ca. L. Rev. 181, 306.
9. George P Fletcher, Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory (1972) 85 Harv. L. Rev. 537.
10. Grogan v Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 286 (1991).
11. Alex Stein, The Refoundation of Evidence Law (1996) 9 Can. J. Law & jurisp. 279, 333-42.
12. James Brook, Inevitable Errors: The Preponderance of the Evidence Standard in Civil Litigation (1982) 18 Tulsa L. J. 79, 85;.
13. Ronald J. Allen, Burdens of Proof, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Modern Legal Discourse (1994) 17 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Poly 627, 634;.
14. David Hamer, The Civil Standard of Proof Uncertainty: Probability, Belief and Justice (1994) 16 Sydney L. Rev. 506.
15. Gerald Postema, The Principle of Utility and the Law of Procedure: Bentham's Theory of Adjudication (1977) 11 Georgia L. Rev. 1393.
16. Robert Summers, Evaluating and Improving Legal Process- A Plea for 'Process Values' (1974) 60 Cornell L. Rev. 1;.
17. Michael D. Bayles, Principles for Legal Procedure (1986) 5 Law & Phil. 33.
18. George P. Fletcher, The Right and the Reasonable (1985) 98 Harv. L. Rev. 949.
19. Dan M. Kahan, Social influence, Social Meaning, and Deterrence (1997) 83 Va. L. Rev. 349.
20. Ariel Porat and Alex Stein, Tort Liability Under Uncertainty (2001), pp. 116-29;.
21. Ariel Porat and Alex Stein, indeterminate Causation and Apportionment of Damages: An Essay on Holtby, Allen and Fairchild (2003) 23 OJLS 667.
22. Lawrence B. Solum and Stephen J. Marzen, Truth and Uncertainty: Legal Control of the Destruction of Evidence (1987) 36 Emory L. J. 1085;.
23. Jamie S. Gorelick, Stephen J. Marzen, and Lawrence B. Solum, Destruction of Evidence (1989).
24. Dale A. Nance, Missing Evidence (1991) 13 Cardozo L. Rev. 831.
25. Tort Liability Under Uncertainty, above note 18, at pp. 160-206.
26. Jane Stapleton, Book Review (2003) 66 M.L.R. 308;.
27. Vern R. Walker, Book Review (2002) 1 Law, Probability & Risk 175;.
28. Richard Friedman, Dealing with Evidentiary Deficiency (1997) 18 Cardozo L. Rev. 1961.
29. Richard A. Bierschbach and Alex Stein, Overenforcement (2005) 93 Georgetown L.J. (forthcoming).
30. Peter Westen, The Empty Idea of Equality (1982) 95 Harv. L. Rev. 537.
31. Anatole France, Le Lys Rouge, in Five Works of Anatole France (W. Stephens trans. 1924) (1896), p. 91.
32. John H. Wigmore, A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common law Vol. 2 (3rd edn., 1940), §§ 1420-2.
33. McCormick On Evidence Vol. 2 (4th edn., 1992), pp. 206-45.
34. Edmund Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence (1962), pp. 340-1.
35. Edmund Morgan, Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept (1948) 62 Harv. L. Rev. 177.
36. Laurence Tribe, Triangulating Hearsay (1974) 87 Harv. L. Rev. 957.
37. David L. Faigman, Is Science Different for Lawyers? (2002) 297 Science 339;.
38. Ronald J. Allen, Expertise and the Daubert Decision (1994) 84 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1157;.
39. Margaret G. Farrell, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Epistemology and Legal Process (1994) 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 2183.
40. David L. Faigman et al., Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony (2nd edn., 2002), pp. 10-13.
41. David E. Bernstein and Jeffrey D. Jackson, The Daubert Trilogy in the States (2004) 44 Jurimetrics J. 351.
42. Edward K. Cheng and Albert H. Yoon, Does Frye or Daubert Matter? A Study of Scientific Admissibility Standards (2005) 91 Virginia L. Rev. 471.
43. Michael J. Saks, The Aftermath of Daubert. An Evolving Jurisprudence of Expert Evidence (2000) 40 Jurimetrics J. 229, 230.
44. Margaret G. Farrell, Coping with Scientific Evidence: The Use of Special Masters (1994) 43 Emory L. J. 927.
45. John Kaplan, Decision Theory and the Fact-Finding Process (1968) 20 Stan. L. Rev. 1065, 1071-5.
46. Glanville Williams, The Proof of Guilt (3rd edn., 1963), pp. 183-94;.
47. Theodore Waldman, Origins of the Legal Doctrine of Reasonable Doubt (1959) 20 J. Hist. Ideas 299;.
48. George Fletcher, Two Kinds of Legal Rules: A Comparative Study of Burden-of-Persuasion Practices in Criminal Cases (1968) 77 Yale L.J. 880;.
49. Barbara Shapiro, 'To a Moral Certainty': Theories of Knowledge and Anglo-American Juries 1600-1850 (1986) 38 Hast. L. J. 153;.
50. Adrian A. S. Zuckerman, The Principles of Criminal Evidence (1989), pp. 122-63.
51. Henry A. Diamond, Reasonable Doubt: To Define or Not to Define (1990) 90 Colum. L. Rev. 1716;.
52. Jon O. Newman, Beyond 'Reasonable Doubt' (1993) 68 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 979.
53. Jeremy Bentham, A Treatise on Judicial Evidence (1825), pp. 196-7.
54. William L. Twining, Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore (1985), p. 99.
55. Alan Wertheimer, Punishing the Innocent -Unintentionally (1977) 20 Inquiry 45.
56. James F. Stephen, History of the Criminal Law of England Vol. 1 (1883), p. 438;.
57. Edmond H. Cahn, The Moral Decision (1955), p. 296.
58. R. Erik Lillquist, Recasting Reasonable Doubt: Decision Theory and the Virtues of Variability (2002) 36 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 85.
59. Judith Shklar, The Faces of Injustice (1988), pp. 51-82.
60. John Rawls, A theory of Justice (1972), p. 60.
61. Alex Stein, The Refoundation of Evidence Law (1996) 9 Can. J. Law & Jurisprudence 279, 323-7.
62. Frederick Schauer, Giving Reasons (1995) 47 Stan. L. Rev. 633.
63. Paul H. Robinson, Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic Analysis (1982) 82 Colum. L. Rev. 199, 236.
64. Alex Stein, Criminal Defences and the Burden of Proof (1991) 28 Coexistence 133, 138-9;.
65. Alex Stein, After HUNT: The Burden of Proof, Risk of Non-Persuasion and Judicial Pragmatism (1991) 54 M. L. R. 570.
66. H. L. A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (1968), pp. 13-14.
67. George Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law (1978), pp. 576-9.
68. Timothy H. Jones, insanity, Automatism, and the Burden of Proof on the Accused (1995) 111 L.Q.R. 475, 495-7.
69. Meir Dan-Cohen, Decision-Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law (1984) 97 Harv. L. Rev. 625.
70. Alex Stein, From Blackstone to Woolmington: On the Development of a Legal Doctrine (1993) 14 J. Leg. Hist. 14.
71. Paul Roberts and Adrian A. S. Zuckerman, Criminal Evidence (2004), pp. 374-84.
72. Richard Friedman, Character Impeachment Evidence: Psycho-Bayesian [!?] Analysis and a Proposed Overhaul (1991) 38 UCLA L. Rev. 637.
73. Ian Molho, The Economics of Information: Lying and Cheating in Markets and Organizations (1997), pp. 63-80, 97-101.
74. Roger C. Park, A Subject Matter Approach to Hearsay Reform (1987) 86 Mich. L. Rev. 51, 102.
75. Eleanor Swift, A Foundation Fact Approach to Hearsay (1987) 75 Calif L. Rev. 1339.
76. Edmund Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence (1962), pp. 340-1.
77. Edmund Morgan, Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept (1948) 62 Harv. L. Rev. 177.
78. Eustace Seligman, An Exception to the Hearsay Rule (1912) 26 Harv. L. Rev. 146;.
79. Edmund Morgan, Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept (1948) 62 Harv. L. Rev. 177;.
80. Ted Finman, Implied Assertions as Hearsay: Some Criticisms of the Uniform Rules of Evidence (1962) 14 Stan. L. Rev. 682;.
81. Laurence Tribe, Triangulating Hearsay (1974) 87 Harv. L. Rev. 957;.
82. Michael Graham, Stickperson Hearsay: A Simplified Approach to Understanding the Rule Against Hearsay (1982) U. I1l. L. Rev. 887;.
83. Olin Guy Wellborn III, The Definition of Hearsay in the Federal Rules of Evidence (1982) 61 Tex. L. Rev. 49;.
84. C. R. Williams, Issues at the Penumbra of Hearsay (1987) 11 Adelaide L. Rev. 113;.
85. Craig R. Callen, Hearsay and Informal Reasoning (1994) 47 Vand. L. Rev. 43.
86. General Electric Co. v Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997).
87. Kumho Tire Co. v Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).
88. Margaret A. Berger, Procedural Paradigms for Applying the Daubert Test (1994) 78 Minn. L. Rev. 1345, 1352-63.
89. Dale Nance, The Best Evidence Principle (1998) 73 Iowa L. Rev. 227;.
90. Michael L. Seigel, Rationalizing Hearsay: A Proposal for a Best Evidence Hearsay Rule (1992) 72 B. U. L. Rev. 893.
91. Illinois V Fisher, 124 S. Ct. 1200 (2004).
92. Arizona v Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988).
93. Daniel J.Seidmann and Alex Stein, The Right to Silence Helps the Innocent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Fifth Amendment Privilege (2000) 114 Harv. L. Rev. 430.
94. United States v Hubbell, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000).
95. Fisher v United States, 425 U.S. 391, 411 (1976).
96. United States v Hubbell, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2046-8 (2000).
97. United States v Veysey, 334 F.3d 600 (7th Cir. 2003), cert. den. 540 U.S. 1129 (2004).
98. Riordan v Kempiners, 831 E2d 690, 698 (7th Cir.1987).
99. United States v Veysey, 334 F.3d 600, 606 (7th Cir. 2003).
100. Vaughn C. Ball, Vaughn C. Ball, The Moment of Truth: Probability Theory and Standards of Proof (1961) 14 Vand. L. Rev. 807, 817-18.
101. Richard A. Posner, An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence (1999) 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1477, 1480-7.
102. Stevenn Shavell, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law (2004), pp. 415-28.
103. Steven Shavell, The Fundamental Divergence Between the Private and the Social Motive to Use the Legal System (1997) 26 J. Leg. Stud. 575.
104. Ian Molho, The Economics of Information: Lying and Cheating in Markets and Organizations (1997).
105. Jeremy Bentham, Rationale of Judicial Evidence Vol. 5 (John Stuart Mill ed., 1827), pp. 1-8.
106. John Kaplan, Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process (1968) 20 Stan. L. Rev. 1065, 1071-2;.
107. David Kaye, Naked Statistical Evidence (1980) 89 Yale L.J. 601, 605 n.19.
108. David Kaye, The Limits of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistical Evidence and Multiple Causation (1982) Am. Bar Found. Res. J. 487.
109. Alex Stein, Allocating the Burden of Proof in Sales Litigation: The Law, Its Rationale, A New Theory, And Its Failure (1996) 50 U. Miami L. Rev. 335, 343.
110. Ralph K. Winter, The Jury and the Risk of Non-Persuasion (1971) 5 Law & Society Rev. 335, 337.
111. Neil Orloff and Jerry Stedinger, A Framework for Evaluating the Preponderance-of-the-Evidence Standard (1983) 131 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1159.
112. A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell, The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law (2000) 38 J. Econ. Lit. 45, 60-2;.
113. Ivan P. L. Png, Optimal Subsidies and Damages in the Presence of Judicial Error (1986) 6 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 101.
114. Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell, Accuracy in the Determination of Liability (1994) 37 J. L. & Econ. 1.
115. H. L. A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (1968), pp. 13-14.
116. See Price Waterhouse v Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).
117. See Addington v Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979).
118. See Schneiderman v United States, 320 U.S. 118 (1943);.
119. Woodby v INS, 385 U.S. 276 (1966).
120. Mason Ladd, Some Observations on Credibility: Impeachment of Witnesses (1967) 52 Cornell L.Q. 239, 247.
121. Adrian A. S. Zuckerman, Civil Procedure (2003), p. 669.
122. Daniel J. Seidmann and Alex Stein, The Right to Silence Helps the Innocent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Fifth Amendment Privilege(2000) 114 Harv. L. Rev. 430.
123. Jeremy Bentham, A Treatise on judicial Evidence (Etienne Dumont, ed. 1825), p. 241.
124. John H. Langbein, The Historical Origins of the Privilege Against Self-incrimination at Common Law (1994) 92 Mich. L. Rev. 1047, 1066-71;.
125. Ian H. Dennis, Reconstructing the Law of Criminal Evidence [1989] Curr. Leg. Probs. 21, 27;.
126. Robert S. Gerstein, The Demise of Boyd: Self-Incrimination and Private Papers in the Burger Court(1979) 27 UCLA L. Rev. 343, 349.
127. William Twining, Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore (1985), pp. 84-5.
128. William J. Stuntz, Self-incrimination and Excuse (1988) 88 Colum. L. Rev. 1227.
129. Anthony B. Atkinson and Joseph E. Stiglitz, Lectures on Public Economics (1980), pp. 482-7.
130. Richard A. Epstein, Common Law, Labor Law, and Reality: A Rejoinder to Professors Getman and Kohler (1983) 92 Yale L.J. 1435, 1435.
131. Andrew Ashworth, Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure (2002), p. 21.
132. H. Richard Uviller, Evidence of Character to Prove Conduct: Illusion, Illogic, and Injustice in the Courtroom (1982) 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 845, 847.
133. Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
134. General Electric Co. v Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997).
135. Kumho Tire Co. v Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).
136. Richard A. Posner, The Law and Economics of the Economic Expert Witness (1999) 13 J. Econ. Persp. 91.
137. Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
138. Ariel Porat and Alex Stein, Tort Liability under Uncertainty (2001), pp. 160-206.
139. Jane Stapleton, Book Review (2003) 66 M.L.R. 308;.
140. Vern R. Walker, Book Review (2002) 1 Law, Probability & Risk 175.
141. Dale Nance, Legal Theory and the Pivotal Role of the Concept of Coercion (1985) 57 U.Colo. L Rev. 1.
142. Mirjan R. Damaska, The Faces of Justice and State Authority (1986), pp. 73-80.
143. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (1971), pp. 238-41.
144. Henry M. Hart and John T. Mc Naughton, Evidence and Inference in the Law, in D. Lerner et al., Evidence and Inference (1959), p. 48 ff.
145. Chaim Perelman, The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument (1963), pp. 98-108.
146. John H. Wigmore, The Principles of Judicial Proof (2nd edn., 1931), pp. 955-6.
147. Jack Weinstein, Some Difficulties in Devising Rules for Determining Truth in Judicial Trials (1966) 66 Colum. L. Rev. 223, 241.
148. Christopher H. Schroeder, Liberalism and the Objective Point of View (1986) XXVIII NOMOS 100, 106-9.
149. Michael Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension (1966), pp. 1-25.
150. Peter Tillers, Modern Theories of Relevancy, in Wigmore On Evidence, Vol. IA (Tillers Revision, 1983), p. 1082;.
151. Peter Tillers, Mapping Inferential Domains (1986) 66 B. U. L. Rev. 883, 936;.
152. Richard W. Wright, Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics, and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the Concepts (1988) 73 Iowa L. Rev. 1001, 1018;.
153. Steven L. Winter, A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind (2001), p. 3.
154. Ronald J. Allen, Structuring Jury Decision-Making in Criminal Cases: A Unified Constitutional Approach to Evidentiary Devices (1980) 94 Harv. L. Rev. 321.
155. L Jonathan Cohen, Belief and Acceptance (1989) 98 Mind 367;.
156. L. Jonathan Cohen, Should a Jury Say What it Believes or What it Accepts? (1991) 13 Cardozo L. Rev. 465;.
157. L. Jonathan Cohen, An Essay on Belief and Acceptance (1992), pp. 1-39, 117-25.
158. Alex Stein, The Refoundation of Evidence Law (1996) 9 Can. J. Law & Jurisp. 279, 310-12.
159. Dale A. Nance, The Best Evidence Principle (1988) 73 Iowa L. Rev. 227.
160. Georg H. Von Wright, A Treatise on induction and Probability (1951), pp. 167-222;.
161. William Kneale, Probability and Induction (1949), pp. 114-73;.
162. Rudolf Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability (1950), pp. 19-51;.
163. L. Jonathan Cohen, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Induction and Probability (1989), pp. 1-39.
164. Michael D. Resnik, Choices: An Introduction to Decision Theory (1987), pp. 68-74.
165. Alex Stein, Judicial Fact-Finding and the Bayesian Method: The Case for Deeper Scepticism About their Combination (1996) 1 Int. J. Evidence & Proof 25;.
166. Alex Stein, Bayesioskepticism Justified (1997) 1 Int. J. Evidence & Proof 339.
167. L. Jonathan Cohen, The Probable and the Provable (1977), pp. 39-43, 48-57.
168. L. Jonathan Cohen, On the Psychology of Prediction: Whose is the Fallacy? (1979) 7 Cognition 385, 389.
169. L. Jonathan Cohen, Freedom of Proof, in William Twining, ed., Facts in Law (1983) 16 A.R.S.P.I, 21.
170. John H. Wigmore, The Principles of Judicial Proof (2nd edn., 1931);.
171. John H. Wigmore, The Science of Judicial Proof (3rd edn., 1937);.
172. William Twining, Rethinking Evidence (1990), pp. 238-42;.
173. Peter Tillers and David Schum, Charting New Territory in judicial Proof: Beyond Wigmore (1988) 9 Cardozo L. Rev. 907.
174. Jerome Frank, Courts on Trial (1949), pp. 165-85;.
175. D. Neil MacCormick, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (1978), pp. 87-93;.
176. D. Neil MacCormick, The Coherence of a Case and the Reasonableness of Doubt (1980) 2 Liverpool L. Rev. 45;.
177. D. Neil MacCormick, Coherence in Legal Justification, in W Krawietz et al. (eds.), Theorie Der Normen (1984), p. 37;.
178. M. A. Abu-Hareira, An Farly Holistic Conception of Judicial Fact-Finding (1986) Juridical Rev. 79;.
179. Richard K. Sherwin, Law Frames: Historical truth and Narrative Necessity in a Criminal Case (1994) 47 Stan. L. Rev. 39;.
180. Ronald J. Allen, Factual Ambiguity and a Theory of Evidence (1994) 88 NW U. L. Rev. 604.
181. Lewis H. LaRue, Stories Versus Theories at the Cardozo Evidence Conference: It's Just Another Metaphor to Me (1992) 14 Cardozo L. Rev. 121.
182. John M. Keynes, A Treatise on Probability (1921), p. 44.
183. Robert Nozick, Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World (2001), pp. 75-90,99.
184. R. A. Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers (7th edn., 1938), p. 120;.
185. James Logue, Projective Probability (1995), pp. 78-95;.
186. Neil B. Cohen, Confidence in Probability: Burdens of Persuasion in a World of Imperfect Knowledge (1985) 60 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 385.
187. Wesley N. Hohfeld, Fundamental LegaI Conceptions as Applied in judicial Reasoning (1923), PP., 32-5.
188. Alex Stein, Of Two Wrongs that Make a Right: Two Paradoxes of the Evidence Law and their Combined Economic Justification (2001) 79 Texas L. Rev. 1199, 1204-5.
189. Alex Stein, An Essay on Uncertainty and Fact-Finding in Civil Litigation, with Special Reference to Contract Cases (1998) 48 U. Toronto L.J. 299, 311-12, n. 27.
190. William J. Baumol, On Taxation and the Control of Externalities (1972) 62 Am. Earn. Rev. 307.
191. Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (6th edn., 2003), p. 209.
192. Adrian A. S. Zuckerman, Civil Procedure (2003), pp. 872-4.
193. See Alyeska Pipeline Co. v Wilderness Socy, 421 U.S. 240 (1975).
194. John C. Coffee, Jr., The Unfaithful Champion: The Plaintiff as Monitor in Shareholder Litigation (1985) 48 (3) Law & Contemp. Probs. 5;.
195. John C. Coffee, Jr., Understanding the Plaintiff's Attorney: The Implications of Economic Theory for Private Enforcement of Law Through Class and Derivative Actions (1986) 86 Colum. L. Rev. 669.
196. Charles M. Yablon, The Good, the Bad, and the Frivolous Case: An Essay on Probability and Rule 11 (1996) 44 UCLA L. Rev. 65.
197. S. Hosid (2002) Perjury, 39 Am. Grim. L. Rev. 895.
198. George Akerlof, The Market for Lemons: Qualiry Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970) 84 Quart. J. Econ. 488.
199. Ronald J. Ailen and Sarah A. Jehl, Burdens of Persuasion in Civil Cases: Algorithms v. Explanations (2003) Mich. St. L. Rev. 893, 922-9.
200. Jason S. Johnston, Legal Formalities, in Peter Newman, ed., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law Vol. 2 (1998), pp. 524-30.
201. Avery W. Katz, Contract Formation and Interpretation, in Peter Newman, ed., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law Vol. 1 (1998), pp. 425, 429-30.
202. W. Page Keeton, Prosser & Keeton On Torts (5th edn., 1984), pp. 537, 545-59.
203. Ronald J. Allen, The Nature of Juridical Proof (1991) 13 Cardozo L. Rev. 373.
204. Richard Lempert, The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of Proof (1986) 66 B. U. L. Rev. 439, 450-4;.
205. Alex Stein, The Refoundation of Evidence Law (1996) 9 Can. J. L. & Juris. 279, 336-8.
206. Richard A. Posner, An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence (1999) 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1477, 1512-14;.
207. Saul Levmore, Conjunction and Aggregation (2001) 99 Mich. L. Rev. 723.
208. Kenneth Graham Jr., There'll Always be an England: The Instrumental Ideology of Evidence (1987) 85 Mich. L. Rev. 1204;.
209. Michael L. Seigel, A Pragmatic Critique of Modern Evidence Scholarship (1994) 88 Nw. U. L. Rev. 995;.
210. Donald Nicolson, Truth, Reason and Justice: Epistemology and Politics in Evidence Discourse (1994) 57 M.L.R. 726.
211. Jonathan Vogel, Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation (1990) 87 J. Phil. 658.
212. Hilary Putnam, Reason, Truth and History (1981), pp. 5-21.
213. Edmund L. Gettier, Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? (1963) 23 Analysis 121.
214. Robert Nozick, The Nature of Rationality (1993), pp. 64-100.
215. Richard Bernstein, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism (1983), pp. 1-25.
216. Joan Williams, Critical Legal Studies: The Death of Transcendence and the Rise of the New Langdells (1987) 62 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 429, 496.
217. Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974) 185 Science 1124.
218. Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982).
219. Christine Jolis, Cass R. Sunstein, and Richard Thaler, A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics (1998) 50 Stan. L. Rev. 1471;.
220. Russell B. Korobkin and Thomas S. Ulen, Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption From Law and Economics (2000) 88 Cal. L. Rev. 1051;.
221. Russell Korobkin, Bounded Rationality, Standard Form Contracts, and Unconscionability (2003) 70 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1203.
222. Richard A. Posner, Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics and the Law (1998) 50 Stan. L. Rev. 1551.
223. Chris William Sanchirico, Evidence, Procedure, and the Upside of Cognitive Error (2004) 57 Stan. L. Rev. 291.
224. L. Jonathan Cohen, Can Human irrationality be Experimentally Demonstrated? (1981) 4 Behavioral & Brain Sciences 317.
225. Alex Stein, The Refoundation of Evidence Law (1996) 9 Can. J. Law & Jurisp. 279.
226. Paul Roberts and Adrian A. S. Zuckerman, Criminal Evidence (2004), pp. 519-34, 582-4;.
227. Adrian A. S. Zuckerman, Civil Procedure (2003), pp. 661-4.
228. Jeremy Bentham, Rationale of Judicial Evidence Vol. 5 (1827), pp. 477-94.
229. Mirjan R. Damaska, Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study (1973) 121 U. Pa. L. Rev. 506;.
230. Mirjan R. Damaska, The faces of justice and State Authority (1986), pp. 29-38, 54-8;.
231. William Twining, Rethinking Evidence (1990), pp. 194-7.
232. James B. Thayer, A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law, (1898), Ch. 12;.
233. Ezra R. Thayer, Observations on the Law of Evidence (1915) 13 Mich. L. Rev. 355, 364.
234. Charles McCormick, Tomorrow's Law of Evidence (1938) 24 A. B. A. J. 507;.
235. Edmund Morgan and John Maguire, Looking Backward and Forward at Evidence (1937) 50 Harv. L. Rev. 909, 922-3;.
236. Edmund Morgan, The Jury and the Exclusionary Rules of Evidence (1937) 4 U. Chi. L. Rev. 247;.
237. John Maguire, Evidence, Common Sense, and Common Law (1947), p. 10 ff;.
238. Edward Cleary, Evidence as a Problem in Communicating (1952) 5 Vand. L. Rev. 277;.
239. Jack Weinstein, Some Difficulties in Devising Rules for Determining Truth in judicial Trials (1966) 66 Colum. L. Rev. 223;.
240. Philip McNamara, The Canons of Evidence-Rules of Exclusion or Rules of Use? (1986) 10 Adelaide L. Rev. 341.
241. Thomas M. Mengler, The Theory of Discretion in the Federal Rules of Evidence (1989) 74 Iowa L. Rev. 413;.
242. David P Bryden and Roger C. Park, 'Other Crimes' Evidence in Sex Offence Cases (1994) 78 Minn. L. Rev. 529, 561.
243. J. D. Heydon, Evidence: Cases and Materials (2nd edn., 1984), p. 3.
244. Karl H. Kunert, Some Observations on the Origin and Structure of Evidence Rules Under the Common Law System and the Civil Law System of 'Free Proof' in the German Code of Criminal Procedure (1966-7) 16 Buffalo L. Rev. 122.
245. Symposium: Does Evidence Law Matter? (1992) 25 Loyola L.A.L. Rev. 629-1023.
246. Richard Lempert, The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of Proof (1986) 66 B. U. L. Rev. 439;.
247. Roger C Park, Evidente Scholarship, Old and New (1991) 75 Minn. I. Rev. 849, 859-71.
248. William Twining and Alex Stein, Evidence and Proof (1992), pp. xxixxiv.
249. L. Jonathan Cohen, Freedom of Proof, in William Twining, ed., Facts in Law (1983) 16 A.R.S.P. 1;.
250. Peter Tillers and David Schum, Hearsay Logic (1992) 76 Minn. L. Rev. 813, 815.
251. Edward A. Purcell Jr., The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value (1973);.
252. James Fishkin, Beyond Subjective Morality (1984);.
253. James Fishkin, Liberal Theory and the Problem of Justification (1986) XXVIII NOMOS 207.
254. Joseph Raz, The Morality of Freedom (1986), p. 181.
255. Jeremy Bentham, A Treatise on judicial Evidence (1825), pp. 6-7.
256. Richard Rorty, Solidarity or Objectivity, in John Rajhman and Cornell West (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy (1985), p. 3.
257. William L. Twining, Hot Air in the Redwoods, A Sequel to the Wind in the Willows (1988) 86 Mich. L. Rev. 1523, 1539-41.
258. Ruth Chang (ed.), Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (1997).
259. Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law (1979), pp. 19-25.
260. Scott J. Shapiro, Authority, in Jules Coleman and Scott J. Shapiro, The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (2002), pp. 382, 385-91, 402-8.
261. George W. Keeton and O. Roy Marshall, Bentham's Influence on the Law of Evidence, in George W. Keeton and Georg Schwarzenberger (eds.), Jeremy Bentham and the Law (1948), pp. 79, 95.
262. Gerald J. Postema, Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (1986), pp. 442-52.
263. John H. Wigmore, Evidence Vol. 1 (Tillers Rev. 1983), pp. 688-9.
264. Winans v Attorney-General [1904] AC 287, 289 (HL).
265. Albert Ehrenzweig, Psychoanalytic Jurisprudence (1971), pp. 278-9.
266. C Brice, Unexplained Losses in Marine Insurance (1991) 16 Tulane Maritime L J. 105 at 113-14, 120, 122-3, 129.
267. Ronald J. Allen, A Reconceptualization of Civil Trials (1986) 66 B. U. L. Rev. 401.
268. A. Conan Doyle, The Sign of Four, in A. Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes: The Complete Illustrated Novels (London: Chancellor Press, 1987), p. 138.
269. D. H. Hodgson, The Scales of Justice: Probability and Proof in Legal Fact-finding (1995) 69 Aust. L. J. 731, 750.
270. David Kaye, The Limits of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistical Evidence and Multiple Causation (1982) Am. Bar Found. Res. J. 487.
271. Alex Stein, An Essay on Uncertainty and Fact-Finding in Cavil Litigation, with Special Reference to Contract Cases (1998) 48 U. Toronto L.J. 299.
272. David Schum, Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning (1994), p. 2.
273. Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire (1986), p. 1.
274. Richard A. Posner, An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence (1999) 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1477, 1480-7.
275. Sven Ove Hansson, Ethical Criteria for Risk Acceptance (2003) 59 Erkenntnis 291.
276. Richard A. Epstein, Common Law, Labor Law and Reality: A Rejoinder to Professors German and Kohler (1983) 92 Yale L.J. 1435, 1435.
277. Guido Calabresi and A. Douglas Melamed, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral (1972) 85 Harv. L. Rev. 1089.
278. Ronald J. Allen, Structuring Jury Decision-Making in Criminal Cases: A Unified Constitutional Approach to Evidentiary Devices (1980) 94 Harv. L. Rev. 321.
279. Gregory Mitchell, Mapping Evidence Law (2003) Mich. St. L. Rev. 1065, 1121.
280. Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Andrew J. Wistrich, and Christopher R Guthrie, Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding (2005) 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1251.
281. Ronald Dworkin, Rights as Trumps, in Jeremy Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights (1984), p. 153.
282. Alex Stein, The Refoundation of Evidence Law (1996) 9 Can. J. Law & Jurisp. 279.
283. Chris Sanchirico, Games, Information and Evidence Production: With Application to English Legal History (2000) 2 Am. L & Econ. Rev. 342;.
284. Chris Sanchirico, Relying on the Information of Interested-and Potentially Dishonest-Parties (2001) 3 Am. L & Econ. Rev. 320;.
285. Chris Sanchirico, Evidence Tampering (2004) 53 Duke L J. 1215.
286. Alan Schwartz and Joel Watson, The Law and Economics of Costly Contracting (2004) 20 J. L. Econ. & Org. 2, 23-4.
287. Alex Stein, An Essay on Uncertainty and Fact-Finding in Civil Litigation, with Special Reference to Contract Cases (1998) 48 U. Toronto L.J. 299, 341-4.
288. Ian Ayres and Robert Gertner, Filling Caps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules (1989) 99 Yale L.J. 87.
289. Amy Jurevic Sokol and Christopher J. Molzen, The Changing Standard of Care in Medicine (2002) 23 J. Legal Med. 449, 474.
290. Tim Gramm, Arthur J. Hartz, and Michael D. Green, Ascertaining Customary Care in Malpractice Cases: Asking Those Who Know (2002) 37 Wake Forest L, Rev. 699, 704-6.
291. James A. Henderson Jr., Process Constraints in Tort (1982) 67 Cornell L. Rev. 901.
292. Fred C. Zacharias, The Politics of Torts (1986) 95 Yale L.J. 698.
293. Dauglas Lichtman, Copyright as a Rule of Evidence (2003) 52 Duke L.J. 683.
294. Adrian Zuckerman (2003) Civil Procedure pp. 462-6.
295. Daniel J. Seidmann and Alex Stein, The Right to Silence Helps the innocent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the Fifth Amendment Privilege (2000) 114 Harv. L. Rev. 430.
296. Jeremy Bentham, A Treatise on judicial Evidence (Etienne Dumont, ed. 1825), p. 241.
297. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (1977), pp. 22-31;.
298. Louis Kaplow, Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis (1992) 42 Duke L.J. 557.
299. Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication (1976) 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1685.
300. Jeremy Bentham, The Principles of Judicial Procedure, 2 Works of Jeremy Bentham (John Bowring ed., 1838-43), p. 6.
301. Gerald Postema, The Principle of Utility and the Law of procedure: Bentham's Theory of Adjudication (1977) 11 Ga. L. Rev. 1393.
302. Dale A. Nance, The Best Evidence Principle (1988) 73 Iowa L. Rev. 227.
303. Larry Alexander, Are Procedural Rights Derivative Substantive Rights? (1998) 17 Law & Phil. 19.
304. Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Laiv (6th edn., 2003), p. 599.
305. Steven Shavell, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law (2004), pp. 387-418.
306. Gerald J. Postema, Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (1986), pp. 344-7.
307. A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell, The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law (2000) 38 J. Econ. Lit. 45, 60-2.
308. Alex Stein, Of Two Wrongs that Make a Right: Two Paradoxes of the Evidence Law and their Combined Economic justification (2001) 79 Texas L. Rev. 199, 1205-6.
309. John Kaplan, Decision Theory and the Pact-Finding Process (1968) 20 Stan. L. Rev. 1065, 1071-5.
310. Michael L. DeKay, The Difference Between Blackstone-like Error Ratios and Probabilistic Standards of Proof (1996) 21 Law & Soc. Inquiry 95.
311. Alex Stein, Evidential Rules for Criminal Trials: Who Should be in Charge?, in Sean Doran and John Jackson (eds.), The judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings (2000), p. 127.
312. Joseph Raz, Value, Respect, and Attachment (2001), pp. 145-58.
313. Richard A. Bierschbach and Alex Stein, Overenforcement (2005) 93 Georgetown L.J. (forthcoming).
314. Ian H. Dennis, The Law of Evidence (1999), p. 488.
315. R. M. Sainsbury, Paradoxes (2nd edn, 1995), pp. 111-17.
316. Thomas Nagel, Concealment and Exposure (1998) 27 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 3.
317. Bernard A. O. Williams, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy (2002), pp. 96-100.
318. Alan Heinrich, Note: Clintons Little White Lies: the Materiality Requirement for Perjury in Civil Discovery (1999) 32 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1303, 1311-16.
319. S. Hosid (2002) Perjury, 39 Am. Grim. L. Rev. 895.
320. Robert Cooter and Winand Emons, Truth-Bonding and other Truth-Revealing Mechanisms for Courts (2004) 17 Eur. J. Law & Econ. 307.
321. McCormick, On Evidence Vol 1 (4th edn., 1992), pp. 268-72.
322. Alissa M. Bassler, Federal Law Should Keep Pace with States and Recognize a Medical Peer Review Privilege (2003) 39 Idaho L. Rev. 689.
323. E. Allan Farnsworth, Contracts (3rd edn., 1999), pp. 363-7, 427-30.
324. McCormick, On Evidence Vol. 2 (4th edn., 1992), p. 451.
325. Richard A. Posner, An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence (1999) 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1477, 1533.
326. John W. Strong, Consensual Modifications of the Rules of Evidence: The Limits of Party Autonomy in an Adversary System (2001) 80 Neb. L. Rev. 1 59.
327. Alan Schwartz, Incomplete Contracts, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Lau Vol. 2 (Peter Newman ed., 1998), pp. 277, 279-80.
328. Laurence Tribe, American Constitutional Law (2nd edn., 1988), pp. 666-7.
329. Robert Summers, Evaluating and Improving Legal Process-A Plea for 'Process Values' (1974) 60 Cornell L. Rev. 1;.
330. Michael D. Bayles, Principles for Legal Procedure (1986) 5 Law & Phil. 33.
331. H. L. A. Harr, Punishment unciResponsibility (1968), pp. 46-9.
332. Adrian A. S. Zuckerman, Quality and Economy in Cavil Procedure-The Case for Com muring Correct judgments for Timely Judgments (1994) 14 Oxford J.L. Stud. 353.
333. David P. Leonard, The Use of Character to Prove Conduct (1986-7) 58 U. Colorado L. Rev. 1.
334. William Twining, Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays (1990). pp. 32-91.
335. Carl G. Hempel, Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation (1962) 3 Minn. Stud. Phil. Sci. 98.
336. Richard A. Posner, The Problems of Jurisprudence (1990), pp. 38-42.
337. Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy (1967), p. 35.
338. Henry E. Kyburg, Jr., Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief (1961), p. 197.
339. David C. Makinson, The Paradox of the Preface (1965) 25 Analysis 205.
340. L. Jonathan Cohen, An Introduction to the Philosophy of induction and Probability (1989), pp. 47-53.
341. Igor Douven, A New Solution to the Paradoxes of Rational Acceptability (2002) 53 Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 391.
342. Igor Douven and Jos Uffink, The Preface Paradox Revisited (2003) 59 Erkenntnis 389.
343. James Hawthorne and Luc Bovens, The Preface, the Lottery, and the Logic of Belief (1999) 108 Mind 241.
344. L. Jonathan Cohen, The Probahle and the Provable (1977), pp. 74-5.
345. Smith v Rapid Transit, 58 N.E. 2d 754 (1945).
346. Charles Nesson, Reasonable Doubt and Permissive Inferences: The Value of Complexity (1979) 92 Harv. L. Rev. 1187, 1192-3.
347. William Kneale, Probability and Induction (1949), pp. 117-222;.
348. Rudolf Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability (1950), pp. 19-51;.
349. Georg H. Von Wright, A Treatise on induction and Probability (1951), pp. 167-222;.
350. Adrian A. S. Zuckerman, The Principles of Criminal Evidence (1989), pp. 134-40.
351. Laurence H. Tribe, Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process (1971) 84 Harv. L. Rev. 1329.
352. Judith J. Thomson, Liability and Individualized Evidence (1986) 49(3) Law & Contemp. Probs. 199 (same).
353. Alex Stein, The Refoundation of Evidence Law (1996) 9 Canadian J. Law & Jurisp. 279, 312-22.
354. Richard A. Posner, An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence (1999) 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1477.
355. Joseph Raz, The Morality of Freedom (1986), p. 181.
356. Milton Friedman, The Methodology of Positive Economics, in Daniel M. Hausman, ed., The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology (2nd edn., 1994), pp. 180-213.
357. R. M. Sainsbury, Paradoxes (2nd edn., 1995) 1.
358. See Smith v rapid Transit, 58 N.E. 2d 754 (1945).
359. Jacob Bernoulli, Ars Conjectandi, Part IV, §iii (1713).
360. L. Jonathan Cohen, Twelve Questions About Keynes's Concept of Weight (1985) 37 Brit. J. Phil, Sci. 263;.
361. L. Jonathan Cohen, The Role of Evidential Weight in Criminal Proof (1986) 66 B. U. L Rev. 635;.
362. R. A. Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers (7th edn., 1938), p. 120 ff;.
363. James Logue, Projective Probability (1995), pp. 78-95.
364. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce Vol. 2 (1932), p. 421.
365. Alvin I. Goldman, Epistemology and Cognition (1988).
366. David Kaye, Apples and Oranges: Confidence Coefficients and the Burden of Persuasion (1987) 73 Cornell L. Rev. 54.
367. Cohen Cohen, above note 49, in (1985) 37 Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 263.
368. Alex Stein, An Essay on Uncertainty and Fact-Finding in Civil Litigation, with Special Reference to Contract Cases (1998) 48 U. Toronto L. J. 299, 324-5.
369. john Stuart Mill, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and inductive (1891), p. 391.
370. Bernard Robertson and G. A. Vignaux, Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995), pp. 16-20.
371. Robert Nozick, Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World (2001), pp. 17-19, 79-87.
372. John H. Wigmore, The Principles of Judicial Proof (2nd edn., 1931), pp. 17-26.
373. Peter Tillers, Prejudice, Politics, and Proof (1988) 86 Mich. L. Rev. 768;.
374. William L. Twining, Hot Air in the Redwoods, A Sequel to the Wind in the Willows (1988) 86 Mich. L. Rev. 1523.
375. Alan H. Goldman, Empirical Knowledge (1988), pp. 289-306.
376. Peter Gärdenfors and Nils-Eric Sahlin, Unreliable Probabilities, Risk Taking and Decision Making (1982) 53 Synthese 361.
377. Frank H. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921), pp. 19-20; 197-232.
378. Ronald J. Allen, Richard B. Kuhns, and Eleanor Swift, Evidence: Text, Problems, and Cases (3rd edn., 2002), pp. 159-60.
379. Nicholas Rescher, Hypothetical Reasoning (1964) p. 21 FF;.
380. Richard Otte, Indeterminism, Counterfactuals, and Causation (1987) 54 Phil. Sci. 45.
381. Frank Jackson (ed.), Conditionals (1991).
382. Larry Alexander, Are Procedural Rights Derivative Substantive Rights? (1998) 17 Law & Phil, 19.
383. A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell, The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of law (2000) 38 j. Econ. Lit. 45, 60-2.
384. Ivan P. L. Png, Optimal Subsidies and Damages in the Presence of Judicial Error, 6 Int. Rev. L. & Econ. 101.