A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 235-286

  Webb, Mary ^a   Cox, Margaret ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009647408     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14759390400200183     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Ainge, D.J. (1996) Upper Primary Students Constructing and Explaining Three Dimensional Shapes: a comparison of virtual reality with card nets, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, pp. 345-369.
2. Alexander, R. (1992) Policy and Practice in Primary Education. London: Routledge.
3. Allen, G. & Tompson, A. (1995) Analysis of the Effect of Networking on Computer-assisted Collaborative Writing in the 5th Grade Classroom, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, pp. 65-75.
4. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K. & Pelletier, R. (1995) Cognitive Tutors: lessons learned, The Journal of Learning Sciences, 4, pp. 167-207.
5. Au, W.K. & Leung, J.P. (1991) Problem Solving, Instructional Methods and Logo Programming, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, pp. 455-467.
6. Banks, F., Leach, J. & Moon, B. (1999) New Understandings of Teachers’ Pedagogic Knowledge, in J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds) Learners and Pedagogy, pp. 89-110. London: Paul Chapman.
7. Barnea, N. & Dori, Y.J. (1999) High-school Chemistry Students’ Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, pp. 257-271.
8. Barton, R. (1997) Does Data-logging Change the Nature of Children’s Thinking in Experimental Work in Science? in B. Somekh & N. Davis (Eds) Using Information Technology Effectively in Teaching and Learning, pp. 63-72. London: Routledge.
9. Baxter, J. & Preece, P. (2000) A Comparison of Dome and Computer Planetaria in the Teaching of Astronomy, Research in Science and Technological Education, 18, pp. 63-69.
10. Beauchamp, T. (2003) Servant or Master: the role of the IT coordinator in secondary schools. London: King’s College, University of London.
11. Bell, R. & Bell, L. (2003) A Bibliography of Articles on Instructional Technology in Science Education, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2, pp. 427-447.
12. Birmingham, P. & Davies, C. (2001) Storyboarding Shakespeare: learners’ interactions with storyboard software in the process of understanding difficult literary texts, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10, pp. 241-253.
13. Boyd, S. (2002) Literature Review for the Evaluation of the Digital Opportunities Projects. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
14. Brand, C., Rader, C., Carlone, H. & Lewis, C. (1998) Prospects and Challenges for Children Creating Science Models, presented at NARST 1998 Annual Meeting, San Diego, April.
15. Bromme, R. (1995) What Exactly is Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Critical Remarks Regarding a Fruitful Research Program, in S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds) Didaktik and/or Curriculum, pp. 205-216. Kiel: IPN.
16. Brown, M., Askew, M., Rhodes, V., Denvir, H., Ranson, E. & Wiliam, D. (2001) Magic Bullets or Chimeras? Searching for Factors Characterising Effective Teachers and Effective Teaching in Numeracy, British Educational Research Association Annual Conference Symposium on Pedagogy and Educational Policy: modernising teaching or narrowing the agenda? University of Leeds.
17. Campbell, P.F., Fein, G.G. & Schwartz, S.S. (1991) The Effects of Logo Experience on First Grade Children’s Ability to Estimate Distance, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, pp. 331-349.
18. Carroll, J.M. (1998) Minimalism Beyond the Nurnberg Funnel. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
19. Clements, D.H. (2000) From Exercises and Tasks to Problems and Projects - unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, pp. 9-47.
20. Comber, C., Watling, R., Lawson, T., Cavendish, S., McEune, R. & Paterson, F. (2002) Learning at Home and School: case studies: a report to the DfES. ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series - No. 8. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
21. Connell, M.L. (1998) Technology in Constructivist Mathematics Classrooms, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17, pp. 311-338.
22. Cope, P., Smith, H. & Simmons, M. (1992) Misconceptions Concerning Rotation and Angle in Logo, Journal for Computer Assisted Learning, 8, pp. 16-24.
23. Cornu, B. (1995) New Technologies: integration into education, in D. Watson & D. Tinsley (Eds) Integrating Information Technology into Education. London: Chapman & Hall.
24. Cox, M.J. (1993) The Project Design and Method, in D. Watson (Ed.) Impact - an evaluation of the impact of the information technology on children’s achievements in primary and secondary schools, pp. 7-25. London: Department for Education and King’s College London.
25. Cox, M.J. (1997) Identification of the Changes in Attitude and Pedagogical Practices Needed to Enable Teachers to Use Information Technology in the School Curriculum, in D. Passey & B. Samways (Eds) IFIP: Information Technology: supporting change through teacher education, pp. 87-94. London: Chapman & Hall.
26. Cox, M.J. (2000) Information and Communication Technologies: their role and value for science education, in M. Monk & J.F. Osborne (Eds) Good Practice in Science Teaching - what research has to say. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
27. Cox, M.J. & Abbott, C. (2004) ICT and Attainment: a review of the research literature. London: Department for Education and Skills.
28. Cox, M.J. & Webb, M.E. (2004) ICT and Pedagogy: a review of the research literature. London: Department for Education and Skills.
29. Cox, M.J., Johnson, D.C. & Watson, D. (1993) The Impact Report: an evaluation of the impact of information technology on children’s achievements in primary and secondary schools. Official research report. London: Department for Education and Skills.
30. Crook, C. (1998) Children as Computer Users: the case of collaborative learning, Computers & Education, 30, pp. 237-247.
31. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) (2000) Survey of Information and Communications Technology in Schools 2000. London: DfEE.
32. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2001) Statistics of Education: survey of information and communications technology in schools 200109/01. London: DfES.
33. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2002) Survey of Information and Communications Technology in Schools 2002. London: DfES.
34. Desforges, C. (1995) How Does Experience Affect Theoretical Knowledge for Teaching? Learning and Instruction, 5, pp. 385-400.
35. Dori, Y.J. & Barak, M. (2001) Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: fostering model perception and spatial understanding, Educational Technology & Society, 4, pp. 61-74.
36. Draper, S.W. (1998) Niche-based Success in CAL, Computers & Education, 30, pp. 5-8.
37. Dreyfus, T. & Halevi, T. (1991) Quadfun - a case study of pupil computer interaction, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 10, pp. 43-48.
38. Eraut, M. (1995) Group Work with Computers in British Primary Schools, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, pp. 61-87.
39. Fang, Z. (1996) A Review of Research on Teacher Beliefs and Practices, Educational Research, 38, pp. 47-64.
40. Gibson, J.J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
41. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001) Running with Technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10, pp. 257-278.
42. Godwin, S. & Beswetherick, R. (2002) Reflections on the Role of Task Structure in Learning the Properties of Quadratic Functions with ICT - a design initiative, in BSRLM Day Conference, Nottingham University, British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, pp. 43-54. Bristol: BSRLM.
43. Goldstein, R. & Pratt, D. (2001) Michael’s Computer Game: a case of open modeling, in Twenty Fifth Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics, Utrecht, pp. 49-56. Utrecht: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics in Education.
44. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P. & Geiger, V. (2003) Perspectives on Technology Mediated Learning in Secondary School Mathematics Classrooms, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, pp. 73-89.
45. Haass, U., Seeber, F. & Weininger, U. (2001) Case Studies of ICT and School Improvement in Germany. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/Centre for Educational Research and Innovation ICT Programme ‘ICT and the Quality of Learning’.
46. Hawkridge, D. (1990) Who Needs Computers in Schools, and Why? Computers and Education, 15, pp. 1-3.
47. Hay McBer (2000) Research into Teacher Effectiveness: a model of teacher effectiveness. Report by Hay McBer to the Department for Education and Employment. London: Department for Education and Employment.
48. Hennessy, S. (2000) Graphing Investigations Using Portable (Palmtop) Technology, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, pp. 243-258.
49. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R. & Ruthven, K. (2003) Pedagogic Strategies for Using ICT to Support Subject Teaching and Learning: an analysis across 15 case studies. Research Report 03/1. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
50. Hinton, T. (1978) Computer Assisted Learning in Physics, Computers & Education, 2, pp. 71-88.
51. Hollow, R.P. (2000) The Student as Scientist: secondary student research projects in astronomy, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 17, pp. 162-167.
52. Hoyles, C. (2001) Steering Between Skills and Creativity: a role for the computer, For the Learning of Mathematics, 21, pp. 33-39.
53. Hoyles, C. & Noss, R. (1992) A Pedagogy for Mathematical Microworlds, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, pp. 31-57.
54. Huppert, J., Yaakobi, J. & Lazarowitz, R. (1998) Learning Microbiology with Computer Simulations: students’ academic achievement by method and gender, Research in Science and Technological Education, 16, pp. 231-245.
55. Jarvis, T., Hargreaves, L. & Comber, C. (1997) An Evaluation of the Role of Email in Promoting Science Investigative Skills in Primary Rural Schools in England, Research in Science Education, 27, pp. 223-236.
56. Jimoyiannis, A. & Komis, V. (2001) Computer Simulations in Physics Teaching and Learning: a case study on students’ understanding of trajectory motion, Computers & Education, 36, pp. 183-204.
57. Johnson, J. & Kane, K. (1992) Developmental and Task Factors on Logo Programming, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, pp. 229-253.
58. Jones, K. (2002) Implications for the Classroom, MicroMath, 18, pp. 18-20.
59. Jones, K. & Simons, H. (1999) Online Mathematics Enrichment: an evaluation of the Nrich Project. Southampton: University of Southampton.
60. Karrer, U. (1991) Impacts of Courseware and Student Characteristics on Learning Achievement: results of an empirical study, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, pp. 18-33.
61. Kozma, R.B. (Ed.) (2003) Technology, Innovation, and Educational Change - a global perspective. International Society for Technology in Education. Washington, DC: ISTE.
62. Kumpalainen, K. & Mutanenen, M. (1998) Collaborative Practice of Science Construction in a Computer-based Multimedia Environment, Computers & Education, 30, pp. 75-85.
63. Laurillard, D. (1998) Multimedia and the Learner’s Experience of Narrative, Computers & Education, 31, pp. 229-242.
64. Laurillard, D., Baric, L., Chambers, P., Easting, G., Kirkwood, A., Plowman, L., Russell, P. & Taylor, J. (1994) Teaching and Learning with Interactive Media. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
65. Lewin, C. (1998) Talking Book Design: what do practitioners want? Computers & Education, 30, pp. 87-94.
66. Linn, M.C. & Hsi, S. (2000) Computers, Teachers, Peers: science learning partners. London: Erlbaum.
67. Martin, A. (1995) Portability as a Catalyst for Cross-curricular Information Technology Permeation, in World Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 645-653. London: Chapman & Hall.
68. Mayer-Smith, J., Pedretti, E. & Woodrow, J. (2000) Closing of the Gender Gap in Technology Enriched Science Education: a case study, Computers & Education, 35, pp. 51-63.
69. McFarlane, A., Friedler, Y., Warwick, P. & Chaplain, R. (1995) Developing an Understanding of the Meaning of Line Graphs in Primary Science Investigations, Using Portable Computers and Data Logging Software, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 14, pp. 461-480.
70. McLoughlin, C. & Oliver, R. (1999) Pedagogic Roles and Dynamics in Telematics Environments, in M. Selinger & J. Pearson (Eds) Telematics in Education: trends and issues, pp. 32-50. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
71. Mellar, H., Bliss, J., Ogborn, J. & Tompsett, C. (1994) Learning with Artificial Worlds: computer based modelling in the curriculum. London: Falmer Press.
72. Moseley, D., Higgins, S., Bramald, R., Hardman, F., Miller, J., Mroz, M., Tse, H., Newton, D., Thompson, I., Williamson, J., Halligan, J., Bramald, S., Newton, L., Tymms, P., Henderson, B. & Stout, J. (1999) Effective Pedagogy Using ICT for Literacy and Numeracy in Primary Schools. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
73. Mumtaz, S. & Hammond, M. (2002) The Word Processor Re-visited: observations on the use of the word processor to develop literacy at Key Stage 2, British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, pp. 345-347.
74. Murray, D. (1992) IT Capability in Primary Schools - a case of something lost in the translation, Journal for Computer Assisted Learning, 8, pp. 96-103.
75. Nastasi, B.K. & Clements, D.H. (1994) Effective Motivation, Perceived Scholastic Competence, and Higher-order Thinking Skills in Two Cooperative Computer Environments, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10, pp. 249-275.
76. Office for Standards in Education (2002) Information and Communication Technology in Secondary Schools. Ofsted Subject Reports Series 2001/02. E-publication HMI 819. London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate.
77. Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) (2003) Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools: standards and quality in education 2001/02. London: Ofsted.
78. Panagiotakopoulos, C.T. & Ioannidis, G.S. (2002) Assessing Children’s Understanding of Basic Time Concepts through Multimedia Software, Computers & Education, 38, pp. 331-349.
79. Pedretti, J.E., Mayer-Smith, J. & Woodrow, J. (1998) Technology, Text, and Talk: students’ perspectives on teaching and learning in a technology-enhanced secondary science classroom, Science Education, 82, pp. 569-590.
80. Preston, C., Cox, M.J. & Cox, K.M.J. (2000) Teachers as Innovators: an evaluation of the motivation of teachers to use information and communications technologies. Croydon: Mirandanet.
81. Rivers, R.H. & Vockell, E. (1987) Computer Simulations to Stimulate Scientific Problem Solving, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, pp. 403-415.
82. Robinson-Staveley, K. & Cooper, J. (1990) The Use of Computers for Writing: effects of an English composition class, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, pp. 41-48.
83. Rogers, R., Edwards, S. & Steers, J. (2001) Survey of Art & Design Resources in Primary and Secondary Schools. London: The Clare Duffield Foundation.
84. Russell, G. (1998) Elements and Implications of a Hypertext Pedagogy, Computers & Education, 31, pp. 185-193.
85. Ruthven, K. & Hennessy, S. (2002) A Practitioner Model of the Use of Computer-based Tools and Resources to Support Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, pp. 47-88.
86. Scanlon, E., Morris, E., Di Paolo, T. & Cooper, M. (2002) Contemporary Approaches to Learning Science: technologically mediated practical work, Studies in Science Education, 38, pp. 73-114.
87. Shulman, L. (1987) Knowledge and Teaching: foundations of the new reform, Harvard Educational Review, 57, pp. 1-22.
88. Silver, N.W. & Repa, J.T. (1993) The Effect of Word Processing on the Quality of Writing and Self-esteem of Secondary School English-as-second-language Students: writing without censure, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, pp. 265-283.
89. Smeets, E. & Mooij, T. (1999) Time on Task, Interaction, and Information Handling in Multi-media Learning Environments, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21, pp. 487-502.
90. Somekh, B. & Davies, R. (1991) Towards a Pedagogy for Information Technology, The Curriculum Journal, 2, pp. 153-170.
91. Sutherland, R. (1993) Connecting Theory and Practice: results from the teaching of Logo, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, pp. 95-113.
92. Swan, K. (1991) Programming Objects to Think with: Logo and the teaching and learning of problem solving, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, pp. 89-112.
93. Tao, P.-K. & Gunstone, R.F. (1999) Conceptual Change in Science through Collaborative Learning at the Computer, International Journal of Science Education, 21, pp. 39-57.
94. Thorpe, R. (1998) The Use of Personal Video Conferencing with Special Needs Pupils from Three Schools Serving Rural Areas: a case of successful adoption of new technology, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 7, pp. 395-411.
95. Tweddle, S. (1997) A Retrospective: fifteen years of computers in English, English in Education, 31, pp. 5-13.
96. Tzur, R. (1999) An Integrated Research on Children’s Construction of Meaningful, Symbolic, Partitioning-related Conceptions and the Teacher’s Role in Fostering that Learning, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, pp. 123-147.
97. Underwood, G. & Underwood, J. (1998) Children’s Interactions and Learning Outcomes with Interactive Talking Books, Computers & Education, 30(1/2), pp. 95-102.
98. Van Haalen, T. & Bright, G.W. (1993) Writing and Revising by Bi-lingual Students in Traditional and Word Processing Environments, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, pp. 313-328.
99. Ward, R. (1996) Fun with Computers and GNVQ: performing to criteria and the confidence to improvise, English in Education, 30, pp. 39-49.
100. Watkins, C. & Mortimore, P. (1999) Pedagogy: what do we know? in P. Mortimore (Ed.) Understanding Pedagogy and Its Impact on Learning. London: Paul Chapman.
101. Watson, D.M.E. (1993) The Impact Report - an evaluation of the impact of the information technology on children’s achievements in primary and secondary schools. London: Department of Education and Science.
102. Waxman, H.C. & Huang, S.-Y.L. (1996) Classroom Instruction Differences by Level of Technology Use in Middle School Mathematics, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, pp. 157-169.
103. Webb, M.E. (1992) Learning by Building Rule Based Models, Computers and Education, 18, pp. 89-100.
104. Webb, M.E. (1994) Beginning Computer-based Modelling in Primary Schools, Computers and Education, 22, pp. 129-144.
105. Webb, M.E. (1996) Children Building Models. The Design and Formative Evaluation of Computer Based Modelling Environments for Schools. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
106. Webb, M.E. (2002) Pedagogical Reasoning: issues and solutions for the teaching and learning of ICT in secondary schools, Education and Information Technologies, 7, pp. 237-255.
107. Webb, M.E. (2003) Learning to Solve ICT/Informatics-based Problems, in T.J. van Weert & R.K. Munro (Eds) Informatics and the Digital Society: social, ethical and cognitive issues, pp. 171-178. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
108. Whitelock, D., Taylor, J., O’Shea, T. & Scanlon, E. (1991) How Students Construct a Shared Understanding of Collisions in Newtonian Mechanics, in International Conference on the Learning Sciences, pp. 430-441. Charlottesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
109. Whitelock, D., Romano, D., Jelfs, A. & Brna, P. (2000) Perfect Presence: what does this mean for the design of virtual learning environments? Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 5, pp. 277-289.
110. Wolfe, E.W., Boulton, S., Feltovich, B. & Bangert, A.W. (1996) A Study of Word Processing Experience and Its Effects on Student Essay Writing, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, pp. 269-283.
111. Wood, C. (2001) Users and Abusers, Teaching ICT, 1(2), pp. 8-10.
112. Xin, J.F. (1999) Computer-assisted Cooperative Learning in Integrated Classrooms for Students with and without Disabilities, Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, pp. 61-78.
113. Yaghi, H. (2001) Subject Matter as a Factor in Educational Computing by Teachers in International Settings, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, pp. 139-154.
114. Yelland, N. (2002) Creating Microworlds for Exploring Mathematical Understanding of the Early Years of School, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27, pp. 77-92.
115. Yelland, N. (2003) Young Children Learning with Logo: an analysis of strategies and interactions, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, pp. 465-486.