Recognition properties of receptors consisting of imidazole and indole recognition units towards carbohydrates

Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 6, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Mazik, Monika ^a   Hartmann, André ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbohydrates; Hydrogen bonds; Molecular recognition; Receptors; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649129768     PISSN: 18605397     EISSN: 18605397     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.6.9     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Lis, H.; Sharon, N. Lectins; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003.
2. Lis, H.; Sharon, N. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 637-674. doi:10.1021/cr940413g
3. Quiocho, F. A. Pure Appl. Chem. 1989, 61, 1293-1306. doi:10.1351/pac198961071293
4. Weiss, W. I.; Drickamer, K. Annu. Rev. Bio Chem. 1996, 65, 441-473. doi:10.1146/annurev. bi.65.070196.002301
5. Lemieux, R. U. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1989, 18, 347-374. doi:10.1039/cs9891800347
6. Davis, A. P.; James, T. D. Carbohydrate Receptors. In . Functional Synthetic Receptors; Hamilton, A. D., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005; pp 45-109. doi:10.1002/352760572X.ch2 For reviews on carbohydrate recognition with artificial receptors using noncovalent interactions, see [6-9].
7. Davis, A. P.; Wareham, R. S. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 3161-3179. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1521-3757 (19991018) 111:20<3160::AID-ANGE3160 >3.0.CO;2-Z
8. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2979-2996. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1521-3773 (19991018) 38:20<2978::AID-ANIE2978>3.0.CO;2- PP
9. Walker, D. B.; Joshi, G.; Davis, A. P. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 3177-3191. doi:10.1007/s00018-009-0081-8
10. Mazik, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 935-956. doi:10.1039/b710910p
11. Ferrand, Y.; Klein, E.; Barwell, N. P.; Crump, N. P.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Vicent, C.; Boons, G.-J.; Ingale, S.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1775-1779. doi:10.1002/anie.200804905 For some recent examples of carbohydrate receptors operating through noncovalent interactions see [10-16] and [27-45].
12. Abe, H.; Takashima, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Inouye, M. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2121-2123. doi:10.1039/b902269d
13. Abe, H.; Horii, A.; Matsumoto, S.; Shiro, M.; Inouye, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2685-2688. doi:10.1021/ol800783a
14. Palde, P. B.; Gareiss, P. C.; Miller, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9566-9573. doi:10.1021/ja802229f
15. Klein, E.; Ferrand, Y.; Auty, E. K.; Davis, A. P. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2390-2392. doi:10.1039/b618776e
16. Nativi, C.; Cacciarini, M.; Francesconi, O.; Moneti, G.; Roelens, S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4685-4688. doi:10.1021/ol701959r
17. Ferrand, Y.; Crump, M. P.; Davis, A. P. Science 2007, 318, 619-622. doi:10.1126/science.1148735
18. James, T. D.; Shinkai, S. Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 218, 159-200. doi:10.1007/3-540-45010-6-6 For reviews on boronic acid-based receptors, which use covalent interactions for sugar binding, see [17, 18].
19. James, T. D.; Sandanayake, K. R. A. S.; Shinkai, S. Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2038-2050. doi:10.1002/ange.19961081706
20. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 1910-1922. doi:10.1002/anie.199619101
21. Davis, A. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3629-3638. doi:10.1039/b909856a
22. Kubik, S. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 1750-1753. doi:10.1002/ange.200805497
23. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1722-1725. doi:10.1002/anie.200805497
24. Mazik, M. ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 1015-1017. doi:10.1002/cbic.200800038
25. Mazik, M.; Balzarini, J. Preparation of poly (hetero) arenes as antiinfective agents. PCT Int. Appl. WO 2008113557, 2008.
26. Mazik, M. Preparation of amino-naphthyridine derivatives as antiinfective agents. PCT Int. Appl. WO 2008113558, 2008.
27. Mazik, M.; Balzarini, J. Preparation of poly (hetero) arenes as antiinfective agents. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 1972338, 2008.
28. Mazik, M. Preparation of amino-naphthyridine derivatives as antiinfective agents. Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 1972627, 2008.
29. Boltz, K. W.; Gonzalez-Moa, M. J.; Stafford, P.; Johnston, S. A.; Svarovsky, S. A. Analyst 2009, 134, 650-652. doi:10.1039/b823156g
30. Mazik, M.; Hartmann, A.; Jones, P. G. Chem.-Eur. J. 2009, 15, 9147-9159. doi:10.1002/chem.200900664
31. Mazik, M.; Buthe, A. C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 2063-2071. doi:10.1039/b901173k
32. Mazik, M.; Hartmann, A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7444-7450. doi:10.1021/jo8005842
33. Mazik, M.; Buthe, A. C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1558-1568. doi:10.1039/b719212f
34. Mazik, M.; Kuschel, M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2008, 14, 2405-2419. doi:10.1002/chem.200701269
35. Mazik, M.; Kuschel, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 1517-1526. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200701097
36. Mazik, M.; Buthe, A. C. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8319-8326. doi:10.1021/jo701370g
37. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 831-838. doi:10.1021/jo061901e
38. Mazik, M.; König, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3271-3276. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200700295
39. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3633-3638. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200700264
40. Mazik, M.; König, A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7854-7857. doi:10.1021/jo0610309
41. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2957-2963. doi:10.1021/jo052479p
42. Mazik, M.; Kuschel, M.; Sicking, W. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 855-858. doi:10.1021/ol052902g
43. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H.; Jones, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9045-9052. doi:10.1021/ja043037i
44. Mazik, M.; Radunz, W.; Boese, R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7448-7462. doi:10.1021/jo048979k
45. Mazik, M.; Sicking, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3117-3121. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.02.087
46. Mazik, M.; Radunz, W.; Sicking, W. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4579-4582. doi:10.1021/ol0201759
47. Mazik, M.; Sicking, W. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 664-670. doi:10.1002/1521-3765 (20010202) 7:3<664::AID-CHEM664>3.0.CO;2-E
48. Mazik, M.; Bandmann, H.; Sicking, W. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 562-565. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1521-3757 (20000204) 112:3<562::AID-ANGE562>3. 0.CO;2-N
49. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 551-554. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1521-3773 (20000204) 39:3<551::AID-ANIE551>3.0.CO;2-7
50. Katritzky, A. R.; Pozharski, A. F. Handbook of Heterocyclic Chemistry; Pergamon: Amsterdam, The Neverlands, 2000; p 131. For a discussion on annular tautomerism of NH-imidazoles, see [46].
51. Wallace, K. J.; Hanes, R.; Anslyn, E.; Morey, J.; Kilway, K. V.; Siegel, J. Synthesis 2005, 2080-2083. doi:10.1055/s-2005-869963
52. Bähr, A.; Felber, B.; Schneider, K.; Diederich, F. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 1346-1376. doi:10.1002/1522-2675 (20000705) 83:7<1346::AID-HLCA1346>3.0.CO;2-3
53. Inouye, M.; Chiba, J.; Nakazumi, H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8170-8176. doi:10.1021/jo9911138
54. Inouye, M.; Miyake, T.; Furusyo, M.; Nakazumi, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12416. doi:10.1021/ja00155a006
55. Schneider, H.-J.; Yatsimirsky, A. Principles and Methods in Supramolecular Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 2000; p 148. For a description of the mole ratio method, see [51, 52].
56. Tsukube, H.; Furuta, H.; Odani, A.; Takeda, Y.; Kudo, Y.; Inoue, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sakamoto, H.; Kimura, K. In Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry; Atwood, J.-L.; Davis, J. E. D.; MacNicol, D. D.; Vögtle, F., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1996; Vol. 8, p 425.
57. Wilcox, C. S.; Glagovich, N. M. Program HOSTEST 5.6. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994. Hostest program is designed to fit data to different binding models, which include both "pure" binding models, taking into consideration the formation of only one type of complex in solution (1:1, 1:2 or 2:1 receptor-substrate complex), and "mixed" binding models containing more than one type of complex in solution (for example, 1:1 and 1:2 or 1:1 and 2:1 receptor-substrate complex).
58. 12. 55. Fielding, L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151-6170. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020 (00) 00492-0
59. Klein, E.; Ferrand, Y.; Barwell, N. P.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 2733-2736. doi:10.1002/ange.200704733
60. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2693-2696. doi:10.1002/anie.200704733
61. Tsuzuki, S.; Uchimaru, T.; Mikami, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 5617-5621. doi:10.1021/jp8093726
62. Terraneo, G.; Potenza, D.; Canales, A.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Baldridge, K. K.; Bernardi, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2890-2900. doi:10.1021/ja066633g
63. Chávez, M. I.; Andreu, C.; Vidal, P.; Aboitiz, N.; Freire, F.; Groves, P.; Asensio, J. L.; Asensio, G.; Muraki, M.; Cañada, F. J.; Jiménez-Barbero, J. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 7060-7074. doi:10.1002/chem.200500367
64. Screen, J.; Stanca-Kaposta, E. C.; Gamblin, D. P.; Liu, B.; Macleod, N. A.; Snoek, L. C.; Davis, B. G.; Simons, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3644-3648. doi:10.1002/anie.200605116
65. Kiehna, S. H.; Laughrey, Z. R.; Waters, M. L. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4026-4028. doi:10.1039/b711431a
66. Morales, J. C.; Penadés, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 654-657. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1521-3773 (19980316) 37:5<654::AID-ANIE654>3.0.CO;2-X
67. Raju, R. K.; Ramraj, A.; Vincent, M. A.; Hillier, I. H.; Burton, N. A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6500-6508. doi:10.1039/b809164a
68. Neidlein, U.; Diederich, F. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1493-1494. doi:10.1039/cc9960001493 For examples of receptors, which show strong di-vs. monosaccharide preference, see [14, 28, 30, 33, 37, 64].