Nearly complete rRNA genes assembled from across the metazoan animals: Effects of more taxa, a structure-based alignment, and paired-sites evolutionary models on phylogeny reconstruction

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-17

  Mallatt, Jon ^a   Craig, Catherine Waggoner ^a   Yoder, Matthew J ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

28S rRNA; Ecdysozoa; Metazoa; Molecular phylogeny; PHASE program; Ribosomal rRNA genes; Secondary structure

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; RNA GENE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, RRNA; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ACOELA; ANIMALIA; ANNELIDA; BILATERIA; CEPHALOPODA; CNIDARIA; COELENTERATA; DEUTEROSTOMIA; ECDYSOZOA; EUTHERIA; LOPHOTROCHOZOA; METATHERIA; METAZOA; MYRIAPODA; MYZOSTOMIDA; NEMERTODERMATIDA; PAUROPODA; PLACOZOA; PROTOSTOMIA;

EID: 76849086222     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Aguinaldo A.M.A., Turbeville J.M., Lindford L.S., Rivera M.C., Garey J.R., Raff R.A., and Lake J.A. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387 (1997) 489-493
2. Baguñà J., Martinez P., Paps J., and Riutort M. Back in time: a new systematic proposal for the Bilateria. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363 (2008) 1481-1491
3. Binenda-Edmonds O.R.P., Cardillo M., Jones K.E., MacPhee R.D.E., Beck R.M.D., Grenyer R., Price S.A., Vos R.A., Gittleman J.L., and Purvis A. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446 (2007) 507-512
4. Blanquart S., and Lartillot N. A Bayesian compound stochastic process for modelling nonstationary and nonhomogeneous sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 (2006) 2058-2071
5. Bleidorn C., Eeckhaut I., Podsiadlowski L., Schult N., McHugh D., Halanych K.M., Milinkovitch M.C., and Tiedemann R. Mitochondrial genome and nuclear sequence data support myzostomids as part of the annelid radiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (2007) 1690-1701
6. Bokov K., and Steinburg S.V. A hierarchal model for evolution of 23S ribosomal RNA. Nature 457 (2009) 977-980
7. Bourlat S.J., Nielsen C., Economou A.D., and Telford M.J. Testing the new animal phylogeny: a phylum level molecular analysis of the animal kingdom. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49 (2008) 23-31
8. Bourlat S.J., Nielsen C., Lockyer A.E., Littlewood D.T.J., and Telford M.J. Xenoturbella is a deuterostome that eats molluscs. Nature 424 (2003) 925-928
9. Cavalier-Smith T., and Chao E.E.-Y. Phylogeny of Choanozoa, Apusozoa, and other Protozoa and early eukaryote megaevolution. J. Mol. Evol. 56 (2003) 540-563
10. Chilton N.B., Huby-Chilton F., Gasser R.B., and Beveridge I. The evolutionary origins of nematodes within the order Strongylida are related to predeliction sites within hosts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40 (2006) 118-128
11. Colbert E.H. Evolution of the Vertebrates. second ed. (1969), John Wiley & Sons, New York
12. Collins A.G., Cartwright P., McFadden C.S., and Schierwater B. Phylogenetic context and basal metazoan model systems. Inter. Comp. Biol. 45 (2005) 585-594
13. Collins A.G., Schuchert P., Marques A.C., Jankowski T., Medina M., and Schierwater B. Medusozoan phylogeny and character evolution clarified by new large and small subunit rDNA data and an assessment of the utility of phylogenetic mixture models. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 97-115
14. da Silva F.B., Muschner V.C., and Bonatto S.L. Phylogenetic position of Placozoa based on large subuint (LSU) and small subunit (SSU) rRNA genes. Genet. Mol. Biol. 30 (2007) 127-132
15. Dellaporta S.L., Xu A., Sagasser S., Jakob W., Moreno M.A., Buss L.W., and Schierwater B. Mitochondrial genome of Trichoplax adhaerans supports Placozoa as the basal lower metazoan phylum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 8751-8756
16. Delsuc F., Brinkmann H., Chourrout D., and Philippe H. Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 439 (2006) 965-968
17. Dixon M.T., and Hillis D.M. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10 (1993) 256-267
18. Dohrmann M., Janussen D., Reitner J., Collins A.G., and Worheide G. Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Syst. Biol. 57 (2008) 388-405
19. Dunn C.W., Hejnol A., Matus D.Q., Pang K., Browne W.E., Smith S.A., Seaver E., Rouse G.W., Obst M., Edgecombe G.D., Sorensen M.V., Haddock S.H.D., Schmidt-Rhaesa A., Okusu A., Kristensen R.M., Wheeler W.C., Martindale M.Q., and Giribet G. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452 (2008) 745-749
20. Eeckhaut I., McHugh D., Mardulyn P., Tiedemann R., Monteyn D., Jangoux M., and Milinkovitch M.C. Myzostomida: a link between trochozoans and flatworms?. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267 (2000) 1383-1392
21. Erpenbeck D., Nichols S.A., Voigt O., Dohrmann M., Degnan B.M., Hooper J.N.A., and Worheide G. Phylogenetic analyses under secondary structure-specific substitution models outperform traditional approaches: case studies with diploblast LSU. J. Mol. Evol. 64 (2007) 543-557
22. Fauchald K., and Rouse G. Polychaete systematics: past and present. Zool. Scr. 26 (1997) 71-138
23. Field K.G., Olsen G.J., Lane D.J., Giovannoni S.J., Ghiselin M.T., Raff E.C., Pace N.R., and Raff R.A. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239 (1988) 748-753
24. Foster P.G. Modelling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 485-495
25. Funch P., and Kristensen R.M. Cycliophora is a new phylum with affinities to Entoprocta and Ectoprocta. Nature 378 (1995) 711-714
26. Gai Y.-H., Song D.-X., Sun H.-Y., and Zhou K.-Y. Myriapod monophyly and relationships among myriapod classes based on nearly complete 28S and 18S rDNA sequences. Zool. Sci. 23 (2006) 1101-1108
27. Galtier N., and Gouy M. Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a non-homogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15 (1998) 871-879
28. García-Varela M., and Nadler S.A. Phylogenetic relationships among Syndermata inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40 (2006) 61-72
29. Gillespie J.J., Yoder M.J., and Wharton R.A. Predicted secondary structure of 28S and 18S rRNA from Ichneumonoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apocrita): impact on sequence alignment and phylogeny estimation. J. Mol. Evol. 61 (2005) 114-137
30. Gillespie J.J., Johnston J.S., Cannone J.J., and Gutell R.R. Characteristics of nuclear (18S, 58S, 28S and 5S) and mitochondrial (12S and 16S) rRNA genes of Apis mellifera (Insecta: Hymenoptera): structure, organization, and retrotransposable elements. Insect Mol. Biol. 15 (2006) 657-686
31. Giribet G. Assembling the lophotrochozoan (=spiralian) tree of life. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363 (2008) 1513-1522
32. Giribet G., Distel D.L., Polz M., Sterrer W., and Wheeler W.C. Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 539-562
33. Giribet G., Edgecombe G.D., Carpenter J.M., D'Haese C.A., and Wheeler W.C. Is Ellipura monophyletic? A combined analysis of basal-hexapod relationships with emphasis on the origin of insects. Org. Divers. Evol. 4 (2004) 319-340
34. Giribet G., Edgecombe G.D., and Wheeler W.C. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413 (2001) 157-161
35. Giribet G., Sorensen M.V., Funch P., Kristensen R.M., and Sterrer W. Investigations into the phylogenetic position of Micrognathozoa using four molecular loci. Cladistics 20 (2004) 1-13
36. Giribet G., and Wheeler W.C. Some unusual small-subunit ribosomal RNA sequences of metazoans. Am. Mus. Novit. 3337 (2001) 1-16
37. Gowri-Shankar, V., Jow, H., 2006. PHASE: a Software Package for Phylogenetics and Sequence Evolution. Version 2.0 manual available from: .
38. Gowri-Shankar V., and Rattray M. A reversible jump method for Bayesian phylogenetic inference with a nonhomogeneous substitution model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (2007) 1286-1299
39. Gutell R.R. Collection of small subunit (16S- and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures: 1994. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 (1994) 3502-3507
40. Gutell R.R., Gray M.W., and Schnare M.N. A compilation of large subunit (23S and 23S-like) ribosomal RNA structures: 1993. Nucleic Acids Res. 21 (1993) 3055-3074
41. Gutell R.R., Lee J.C., and Cannone J.J. The accuracy of ribosomal RNA comparative structure models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 301-310
42. Halanych K.M. The new view of animal phylogeny. Annu. Rev. Nat. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35 (2004) 229-256
43. Halanych K.M., Bacheller J.D., Aguinaldo A.M.A., Liva S.M., Hillis D.M., and Lake J.A. Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267 (1995) 1641-1643
44. Hassouna N., Michot B., and Bachellerie J.P. The complete nucleotide sequence of mouse 28S rRNA gene. Implications for the process of size increase of the large subunit rRNA in higher eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 12 (1984) 3563-3583
45. Hausdorf B., Helmkampf M., Meyer A., Witek A., Herlyn H., Bruchhaus I., Hankeln T., Struck T.H., and Lieb B. Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (2007) 2723-2729
46. Hedges S.B., Moberg K.D., and Maxson L.R. Tetrapod phylogeny inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA sequences and a review of the evidence for amniote relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7 (1990) 607-633
47. Hejnol A., and Martindale M.Q. Acoel development supports a simple planula-like urbilaterian. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363 (2008) 1493-1502
48. Hejnol A., and Martindale M.Q. Acoel development indicates the independent evolution of the bilaterian mouth and anus. Nature 546 (2008) 382-386
49. Hillis D.M., and Dixon M.T. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Quart. Rev. Biol. 66 (1991) 411-453
50. Hudelot C., Gowri-Shankar V., Jow H., Rattray M., and Higgs P.C. RNA-based phylogenetic methods: application to mammalian mitochondrial RNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28 (2003) 241-252
51. Janke A., Magnell O., Wieczorek G., Westerman M., and Arnason U. Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rRNA and the mitochondrial genomes of the wombat, Vombatus ursinus, and the spiny anteater Tachyglossus aculeatus: increased support for the Marsupionta. J. Mol. Evol. 54 (2002) 71-80
52. Jenner R.A., and Littlewood D.T.J. Problematica old and new. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363 (2008) 1503-1512
53. Jondelius U., Ruiz-Trillo I., Baguñà J., and Riutort M. The Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians and not members of the Platyhelminthes. Zool. Scr. 31 (2002) 201-215
54. Jow H., Hudelot C., Rattray M., and Higgs P.G. Bayesian phylogenetics using an RNA substitution model applied to early mammalian evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 (2002) 1591-1601
55. Kardong K.V. Vertebrates. Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution. fourth ed. (2006), McGraw Hill Higher Education, Dubuque, IA
56. Kjer K.M. Aligned 18S and insect phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 506-514
57. Kjer K.M., Gillespie J.J., and Ober K.A. Opinions of multiple sequence alignment and an empirical comparison of repeatability and accuracy between POY and structural alignment. Syst. Biol. 56 (2007) 133-146
58. Kober K.M., and Nichols S.A. On the phylogenetic relationships of hadromerid and poecilosclerid sponges. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 87 (2007) 1585-1598
59. Lartillot N., and Philippe H. Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363 (2008) 1463-1472
60. Leontis N.B., and Westhof E. Analysis of RNA motifs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13 (2003) 300-308
61. Lockyer A.E., Olson P.D., and Littlewood D.T.J. Utility of complete large and small subunit rRNA genes in resolving the phylogeny of the Neodermata (Platyhelminthes): implications and a review of the carcomer theory. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 78 (2003) 155-171
62. Luan Y.X., Mallatt J.M., Xie R.D., Yang Y.M., and Yin W.Y. The phylogenetic positions of three basal-hexapod groups (Protura, Diplura, and Collembola) based on ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (2005) 1579-1592
63. Mallatt J., and Giribet G. Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40 (2006) 772-794
64. Mallatt J., and Sullivan J. 28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15 (1998) 1706-1718
65. Mallatt J., and Winchell C.J. Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 (2002) 289-301
66. Mallatt J., and Winchell C.J. Ribosomal RNA genes and deuterostome phylogeny revisited: more cyclostomes, elasmobranchs, reptiles, and a brittle star. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43 (2007) 1005-1022
67. Mallatt J.M., Garey J.R., and Shultz J.W. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31 (2004) 178-191
68. Mallatt J., Sullivan J., and Winchell C.J. The relationships of lampreys to hagfishes: a spectral analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences. In: Ahlberg P.E. (Ed). Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution: Palaeontology, Phylogeny, and Development (2001), Taylor and Francis, London 106-118
69. Marlétaz F., Martin E., Perez Y., Papillon D., Caubit X., Lowe C.J., Freeman B., Fasano L., Dossat C., Wincker P., Weissenbach J., and Le Parco Y. Chaetognath phylogenomics: a protostome with a deuterostome-like development. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) R577-R578
70. Matus D.Q., Copley R.R., Dunn C.W., Hejnol A., Eccleston H., Halanych K.M., Martindale M.Q., and Telford M.J. Broad taxon and gene sampling indicate that chaetognaths are protostomes. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) R575-R576
71. Mayrose I., Friedman N., and Pupko T. A Gamma mixture model better accounts for among-site rate heterogeneity. Bioinformatics 21 Suppl. 2 (2005) ii151-ii158
72. Medina M., Collins A.G., Silberman J.D., and Sogin M.L. Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small subunit rRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001) 9707-9712
73. Morrison D.A. Increasing the efficiency of searches for the maximum likelihood trees in a phylogenetic analysis of up to 150 nucleotide sequences. Syst. Biol. 56 (2007) 988-1010
74. Nawrocki E.P., Kolbe D.L., and Eddy S.R. Infernal 1.0: Inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 25 (2009) 1335-1337
75. Noller H.F. RNA structure: reading the ribosome. Science 309 (2005) 1508-1514
76. Paps J., Baguñà J., and Riutort M. Lophotrochozoa internal phylogeny: new insight from an up-to-date analysis of nuclear ribosomal genes. Proc. R. Soc. B. 276 (2009) 1245-1254
77. Passamaneck Y., and Halanych K.M. Lophotrochozoan phylogeny assessed with LSU and SSU data: evidence of lophophorate polyphyly. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40 (2006) 20-28
78. Passamaneck Y.J., Schander C., and Halanych K.M. Investigation of molluscan phylogeny using large-subunit and small-subunit nuclear rRNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32 (2004) 25-38
79. Peterson K.J., and Eernisse D.J. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evol. Dev. 3 (2001) 170-205
80. Philippe H., and Telford M.A. Large-scale sequencing and the new animal phylogeny. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 (2006) 614-620
81. Philippe, H., Brinkmann, H., Martinez, P., Riutort, M., Baguñà, J., 2007. Acoel flatworms are not Platyhelminthes: evidence from phylogenomics. PLoS ONE 2(8), e717, 1-4.
82. Phillipe H., Derille R., et al. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr. Biol. 19 (2009) 706-712
83. Pimentel R.A. Invertebrate Identification Manual (1967), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
84. Posada D., and Buckley T. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 793-808
85. Putnam N.H., et al. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate genotype. Nature 453 (2008) 1064-1071
86. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: .
87. Rix M.G., Harvey M.S., and Roberts J.D. Molecular phylogenetics of the spider family Micropholcommatidae (Arachnida: Araneae) using nuclear rRNA genes (18S and 28S). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 46 (2008) 1031-1048
88. Rogozin I.B., Wolf Y.I., Carmel L., and Koonin E.V. Ecdysozoan clade rejected by genome-wide analysis of rare amino acid replacements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25 (2007) 1080-1090
89. Ruiz-Trillo I., Paps J., Loukota M., Ribera C., Jondelius U., Baguñà J., and Riutort M. A phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain type II sequences corroborates that Acoela and Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 11246-11251
90. Ruiz-Trillo I., Riutort M., Fourcade H.M., Baguñà J., and Boore J.L. Mitochondrial genome data support the basal position of Acoelomorpha and the polyphyly of the Platyhelminthes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33 (2004) 321-332
91. Ruiz-Trillo I., Riutort M., Littlewood D.T.J., Herniou E.A., and Baguñà J. Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian metazoans, not members of the Platyhelminthes. Science 283 (1999) 1919-1923
92. Ruppert E.E. Key characters uniting hemichordates and chordates: homologies or homplasies?. Can. J. Zool. 83 (2005) 8-23
93. Ruppert E.E., Fox R.S., and Barnes R.D. Invertebrate Zoology, A Functional Evolutionary Approach. seventh ed. (2004), Thomson, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA
94. Savill N.J., Hoyle D.C., and Higgs P.G. RNA sequence evolution with secondary structure constraints: comparison of substitution rate models using maximum-likelihood methods. Genetics 157 (2001) 399-411
95. Schierwater B., Eitel M., Jakob W., Osigus H., Hadrys H.-J., Dellaporta S.L., Kolokotronis S.-O., and DeSalle R. Concatenated analysis sheds light on early metazoan evolution and fuels a modern "urmetazoan" hypothesis. PLoS Biol. 7 (2009) 36-43
96. Schnare M.N., Damberger S.H., Gray M.W., and Gutell R.R. Comprehensive comparison of structural characteristics in eukaryotic cytoplasmic large subunit (23 S-like) ribosomal RNA. J. Mol. Evol. 256 (1996) 701-719
97. Schmidt-Rhaesa A. Ultrastructure of the anterior end in three ontogenetic stages of Nectonema minudae (Nematomorpha). Acta Zool. 77 (1996) 267-278
98. Sempere L.F., Martinez P., Cole C., Baguñà J., and Peterson K.J. Phylogenetic distribution of microRNAs supports the basal position of acoel flatworms and the polyphyly of Platyhelminthes. Evol. Dev. 9 (2007) 409-415
99. Shi X., Gu H., Susko E., and Field C. The comparison of confidence regions in phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (2005) 2285-2296
100. Shimodaira H. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 492-508
101. Shimodaira H., and Hasegawa M. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 1246-1247
102. Smith S.A., and Dunn C.W. Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments, and molecular data. Bioinformatics 24 (2008) 715-716
103. Srivastava M., et al. The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature 454 (2008) 955-960
104. Stamatakis, A., 2008. The RAxML 7.0.0 Manual. Available from: .
105. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., and Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 75 (2008) 758-771
106. Struck T.H., and Fisse F. Phylogenetic position of nemertea derived from phylogenomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25 (2008) 728-736
107. Struck T.H., Schult N., Kusen T., Hickman E., Bleidorn C., McHugh D., and Halanych K.M. Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007 (2007) 7:57
108. Swofford D.L., Olsen G.J., Waddell P.J., and Hillis D.M. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis D.M., Moritz C., and Mable B.K. (Eds). Molecular Systematics. second ed. (1996), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland 407-514
109. Syed T., and Schierwater B. Trichoplax adhaerens: a phylum discovered, forgotten, and rediscovered. Vie Milieu 52 (2002) 177-187
110. Telford M.J., Bourlat S.J., Economou A., Papillon D., and Rota-Stabelli O. The evolution of the Ecdysozoa. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363 (2008) 1529-1538
111. Telford M.J., Lockyer A.E., Cartwright-Finch C., and Littlewood D.T.J. Combined large and small subunit ribosomal phylogenies support a basal position of the acoelomorph flatworms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270 (2003) 1077-1083
112. Telford M.J., Wise M.J., and Gowri-Shankar V. Consideration of RNA secondary structure improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the Bilateria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (2005) 1129-1136
113. Thorley J.L., and Wilkinson M. Testing the phylogenetic stability of early tetrapods. J. Theor. Biol. 200 (1999) 343-344
114. Voigt O., Collins A.G., Buchsbaum Pearse V., Pearse J.S., Ender A., Hadrys H., and Schierwater B. Placozoa-no longer a phylum of one. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) R944-R945
115. von Reumont B.M., Meusemann K., Szucsich N.U., Dell 'Ampio E., Gowri-Shankar V., Bartel D., Simon S., Letsch H.O., Stocsits R.R., Luan Y.-x., Waegele J.W., Pass G., Hadrys H., and Misof B. Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships. BMC Evol. Biol. 9 (2009) 119
116. Wallberg A., Curini-Galletti M., Ahmadzadeh A., and Jondelius U. Dismissal of Acoelomorpha: Acoela and Nemertodermatida are separate early bilaterian clades. Zool. Scripta 36 (2007) 509-523
117. Wallberg A., Thollesson M., Farris J.S., and Jondelius U. The phylogenetic position of the comb jellies (Ctenophora) and the importance of taxonomic sampling. Cladistics 20 (2004) 558-578
118. Ware J.L., Ho S.Y.W., and Kjer K. Divergence dates of libelluloid dragonflies (Odonata: Anisoptera) estimated from rRNA using paired-sites substitution models. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 47 (2008) 426-432
119. Warren W.C., et al. Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution. Nature 453 (2008) 175-183
120. Wessa, P., 2008. Free Statistics Software, Office of Research Development and Education, version 1.1.23-r2. Available from: .
121. Wheeler W.C., and Honeycutt R.L. Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: evolutionary and phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol 5 (1988) 90-96
122. Wilkinson M. Identifying stable reference taxa for phylogenetic nomenclature. Zool. Scripta 35 (2006) 109-112
123. Winchell C.J., Martin A.P., and Mallatt J. Phylogeny of elasmobranches based on LSU and SSU ribosomal RNA genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31 (2004) 214-224
124. Winchell C.J., Sullivan J., Cameron C.B., Swalla B.J., and Mallatt J. Evaluating hypotheses of deuterostome phylogeny and chordate evolution with new LSU and SSU ribosomal DNA data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 (2002) 762-776
125. Winnepinninckx B., Backeljau T., Mackey L., Brooks J.M., De Wachter R., Kumar S., and Garey J.R. 18S rRNA data indicate that Aschelminthes are polyphyletic in origin and consist of at least three distinct clades. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 (1995) 1132-1137
126. Zheng J., Rogozin I.B., Koonin E.V., and Przytycka T.M. Support for the Coelomata clade of animals from a rigorous analysis of the pattern of intron conservation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (2007) 2583-2592
127. Zrzavy J., Hypsa V., and Tietz D. Myzostomida are not annelids: molecular and morphological support for a clade of animals with anterior sperm flagella. Cladistics 17 (2001) 1-29
128. Zwickl, D.J., 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.