Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals

Nature

Volumn 387, Issue 6632, 1997, Pages 489-493

  Aguinaldo, Anna Marie A ^a   Turbeville, James M ^b   Linford, Lawrence S ^a   Rivera, Maria C ^a   Garey, James R ^c,d   Raff, Rudolf A ^e   Lake, James A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^c DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^e INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME DNA;

ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS; MOLTING; NEMATODE; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TAXONOMY;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NEMATODA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S;

EID: 0031010579     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/387489a0     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Boudreaux, H. B. Arthropod Phylogeny with Special Reference to Insects (Wiley, New York, 1979).
2. Raff, R. A., Marshall, C. R. & Turbeville, J. M. Using DNA sequences to unravel the Cambrian radiation of the animal phyla. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 351-375 (1994).
3. Eernisse, D. J., Albert, J. S. & Anderson, F. E. Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: a phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Syst. Biol. 41, 305-330 (1992).
4. Ballard, J. W. et al. Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science 258, 1345-1348 (1992).
5. Weygoldt, P. Arthropod relationships: the phylogenetic-systematic approach. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 24, 19-35 (1986).
6. Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. Invertebrates (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1990).
7. Halanych, K. M. et al. Evidence from 18S ribosomal DNA that the lophophorates are protostome animals. Science 267, 1641-1632 (1995).
8. Lake, J. A. The order of sequence alignment can bias the selection of tree topology. Biol. Evol. 8, 378-385 (1991).
9. Stewart, C.-B. The powers and pitfalls of parsimony. Nature 361, 603-607 (1993).
10. Winnepenninckx, B. et al. 18S rRNA data indicate that aschelminthes are polyphyletic in origin and consist of at least three distinct clades. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 1132-1137 (1995).
11. Wright, K. in Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates Vol. 4 (eds Harrison, F. W. & Ruppert, E. E.) 111-195 (Wiley-Liss, New York, 1991).
12. Lake, J. A. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: Paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 1455-1459 (1994).
13. Lockhart, P. J., Steel, M. A., Hendy, M. D. & Penny, D. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 605-612 (1994).
14. Field, K. G. et al. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239, 748-753 (1988).
15. Hillis, D. M. & Bull, J. J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 182-192 (1993).
16. Nielsen, C. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla (Oxford University Press, 1995).
17. Gee, H. Before the Backbone: Views on the Origin of the Vertebrates (Chapman & Hall, London, 1996).
18. Balavione, G. The early emergence of plaryhelminths is contradicted by the agreement 18S r rRNA and Hox data. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Life Sci. 320, 83-94 (1997).
19. Valentine, J. W. Bilaterians of the Precambrian-Cambrian transition and the annelid-arthopod r relationship. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2272-2275 (1989).
20. Patterson, C. The Hierarchy of Life (eds Fernholm, B., Bremer, K. & Jornvall, H.) 471-488 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989).
21. Lake, J. A. Origin of the Metazoa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 763-766 (1990).
22. Ruppert, E. E. in Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates Vol. 4, (eds Harrison, R. W. & Ruppert, E. E.) 1-17 (Wiley-Liss, New York, 1991).
23. de Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39, 307-322 (1990).
24. Boore, J. L., Collins, T. M., Stanton, S., Daehier, L. L. & Brown, W. M. Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements. Nature 376, 163-165 (1995).
25. Canway Morris, S. The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa. Nature 361, 219-255 (1993).
26. Lake, J. A. Calculating the probability of multitaxon evolutionary trees: Bootstrappers Gambit Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9662-9666 (1995).
27. Goldman, N. Simple diagnostic statistical tests of models for DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 37, 650-661 (1993).
28. Felsenstein, J. & Churchill, G. A. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 93-104 (1996).
29. Wallace, R. L., Ricci, C. & Malone, G. A cladistic analysis of pseudoceolomate (aschelminth) morphology. Invert. Biol. 115, 104-112 (1996).
30. Garey, J. R., Krotec, M., Nelson, D. R. & Brooks, J. Molecular analysis supports a Tardigrade-Arthropod association. Invert. Biol. 115, 79-88 (1996).