The phylogenetic positions of three basal-hexapod groups (Protura, Diplura, and Collembola) based on ribosomal RNA gene sequences

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1579-1592

  Luan, Yun Xia ^a   Mallatt, Jon M ^b   Xie, Rong Dong ^a   Yang, Yi Ming ^a   Yin, Wen Ying ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY   (China)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collembola; Diplura; Molecular phylogeny; Protura; Ribosomal RNA genes

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME RNA; RNA 18S; RNA 28S;

ACERENTOMATA; ANTHROPLEONA; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CAMPODEOIDEA; COLLEMBOLA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPLURA; ELLIPURA; ENTOMOBRYOMORPHA; EOSENTOMATA; EVOLUTION; HEXAPODA; HYPOTHESIS; INSECT; JAPYGOIDEA; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; NONOCULATA; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PODUROMORPHA; PROJAPYGOIDEA; PROTURA; RNA SEQUENCE; SINENTOMATA; SYMPHYPLEONA;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE FREQUENCY; HISTORY, ANCIENT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ARTHROPLEONA; ARTHROPODA; CAMPODEOIDEA; COLLEMBOLA; DIPLURA (HEXAPODS); HEXAPODA; INSECTA; JAPYGOIDEA; PROJAPYGOIDEA; PROTURA; SYMPHYPLEONA;

EID: 20444400537     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi148     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abele, L. G., W. Kim, and B. E. Felgenhauer. 1989. Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea. Mol. Biol. Evol. 66:685-691.
2. Ballard, J. W., G. J. Olsen, D. P. Faith, W. A. Odgers, D. M. Rowell, and P. W. Atkinson. 1992. Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science 258:1345-1348.
3. Bilinski, S. 1994. The ovary of Entognatha. Pp. 7-30 in J. Büning, ed. The insect ovary. Chapman & Hall, London.
4. Bitsch, C., and J. Bitsch. 2000. The phylogenetic interrelationships of the higher taxa of apterygote hexapods. Zool. Scr. 29:131-156.
5. -. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of basal hexapods among the mandibulate arthropods: a cladistic analysis based on comparative morphological characters. Zool. Scr. 33:511-550.
6. Boore, J. L., T. M. Collins, D. Stanton, L. L. Daehler, and W. M. Brown, 1995. Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements. Nature 376:163-165.
7. Boore, J. L., D. V. Lavrov, and W. M. Brown. 1998. Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans. Nature 392: 667-668.
8. Börner, C. 1910. Die phylogenetische Bedeutung der Protura. Biol. Zbl. 30:633-641.
9. Boudreaux, H. B. 1979. Arthropod phylogeny, with special reference to insects. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. Brusca, R. C., and G. J. Brusca. 2003. Invertebrates. 2nd edition. Sinauer Associations, Sunderland, Mass.
11. Cameron, S. L., K. B. Millar, C. A. D'Haese, M. F. Whiting, and S. C. Barker. 2004. Mitochondrial genome data alone are not enough to unambiguously resolve the relationships of Entognatha, Insecta and Crustacea sensu lato (Arthropoda). Cladistics 20:534-557.
12. Carapelli, A., F. Frati, F. Nardi, R. Dallai, and C. Simon. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of apterygotan insects based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Pedobiologia 44:361-373.
13. Colgan, D. J., A. McLauchlan, G. D. F. Wilson, S. P. Livingston, G. D. Edgecombe, J. Macaranas, G. Cassis, and M. R. Gray. 1998. Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution. Aust. J. Zool. 46:419-437.
14. Dallai, R. 1976. Fine structure of the pyloric region and malpighian papillae of Protura (Insecta Apterygota). J. Morphol. 150:727-762.
15. Dallai, R., and D. Burroni. 1982. Fine structure of the pyloric region and malpighian papillae of Diplura. Mem. Soc. Entomol. Ital. 60:125-135.
16. Delamare, D. C., and Z. Massoud. 1968. Révision de Protentomobrya walkeri Folsom, Collembole du Crétacé, et remarques sur sa position systématique. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 4:619-630.
17. Delsuc, F., M. J. Phillips, and D. Penny. 2003. Comment on "Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic." Science 301:1482d.
18. D'Haese, C. A. 2002. Were the first springtails semi-aquatic? A phylogenetic approach by means of 28S rDNA and optimization alignment. Proc. R. Soc. B 269:1143-1151.
19. -. 2003. Morphological appraisal of Collembola phylogeny with special emphasis on Poduromorpha and a test of the aquatic origin hypothesis. Zool. Scr. 32:563-586.
20. Efron, B. 1985. Bootstrap confidence intervals for a class of parametric problems. Biometrika 72:45-58.
21. Ferguson, L. M. 1990. Insecta: Diplura. Pp. 951-963 in D. L. Dindal, ed. Soil biology guide. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
22. Foster, P. G., and D. A. Hickey. 1999. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. J. Mol. Evol. 48:284-290.
23. Frati, F., and E. Dell'Ampio. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of three subfamilies of the Neanuridae (Insecta, Collembola) and the position of the Antarctic species Friesea grisea Schäffer. Pedobiologia 44:342-360.
24. Friedrich, M., and D. Tautz. 1995. Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376:165-167.
25. -. 1991. An episodic change of rDNA nucleotide substitution rate has occurred during the emergence of the insect order Diptera. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:644-653.
26. Giribet, G., and C. Ribera. 1998. The position of arthropods in the animal kingdom: a search of reliable outgroup for internal arthropod phytogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:481-488.
27. -. 2000. A review of Arthropoda phylogeny: new data based on ribosomal DNA sequences and direct character optimization. Cladistics 16:204-231.
28. Giribet, G., G. D. Edgecombe, J. M. Carpenter, C. D'Haese, and W. C. Wheeler. 2004. Is Ellipura monophyletic? A combined analysis of basal hexapod relationships with emphasis on the origin of insects. Org. Divers. Evol. 4:319-340.
29. Giribet, G., G. D. Edgecombe, and W. C. Wheeler. 2001. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413:157-161.
30. Giribet, G., S. Richter, G. D. Edgecombe, W. C. Wheeler. 2005. The position of crustaceans within the Arthropoda-evidence from nine molecular loci and morphology. Crustac. Issues 16:307-352.
31. Gloor, G. B., C. R. Preston, D. M. Johnson-Schlitz, N. A. Nassif, R. W. Phillis, W. K. Benz, H. M. Robertson, and W. R. Engels. 1993. Type I repressors of P element mobility. Genetics 135:81-95.
32. Gutell, R. R. 1994. Collection of small subunit (16S-and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:3502-3507.
33. Gutell, R. R., M. W. Gray, and M. N. Schnare. 1993. A compilation of large subunit (23S and 23S-like) ribosomal RNA structures: 1993. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:3055-3074.
34. Hancock, J. M., D. Tautz, and G. A. Dover. 1988. Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:393-414.
35. Hendricks, L., C. Van Broeckhoven, A. Vandenberghe, Y. Van de Peer, and R. De Wachter. 1988. Primary and secondary structure of the 18S ribosomal RNA of the bird spider Eurypelma californica and evolutionary relationships among eukaryotic phyla. Eur. J. Biochem. 177:15-20.
36. Hennig, W. 1953. Kritische bemerkungen zum phylogenetischen system der insekten. Beitr. Entomol. 3 (Sonderheft): 1-85.
37. -. 1981. Insect phylogeny. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
38. Hillis, D. M., and M. T. Dixon. 1991. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 66:411-453.
39. Huelsenbeck, J. P., D. M. Hillis, and R. Jones. 1996. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance. Pp. 19-45 in J. E. Ferraris, and S. R. Palumbi, eds. Molecular zoology: advances, strategies, and protocols. Wiley-Liss, New York.
40. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
41. Ikeda, Y., and R. Machida. 1998. Embryogenesis of the dipluran Lepidocampa weberi Oudemans (Hexapoda, Diplura, Campodeidae): external morphology. J. Morphol. 237:101-115.
42. Jermin, L. S., S. Y. W. Ho, F. Ababneh, J. Robinson, and A. W. D. Larkum. 2004. The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst. Biol. 53:638-643.
43. Kjer, K. M. 2004. Aligned 18S and insect phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 53:506-514.
44. Koch, M. 1997. Monophyly and phylogenetic position of the Diplura (Hexapoda). Pedobiologia 41:9-12.
45. Kristensen, N. P. 1981. Phylogeny of insect orders. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26:135-157.
46. -. 1991. Phylogeny of extant hexapods. Pp. 125-140 in I. D. Naumann, ed. The insects of Australia, Vol. 1, 2nd edition. Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Australia.
47. Kukalová-Peck, J. 1987. New Carboniferous Diplura, Monura, and Thysanura, the hexapod ground plan, and the role of thoracic side lobes in the origin of wings (Insecta). Can. J. Zool. 65:2327-2345.
48. -. 1991. Fossil history and the evolution of hexapod structures. Pp. 141-179 in Naumann, I. D., ed. The insects of Australia, Vol. 1, 2nd edition. Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Australia.
49. Lake, J. A. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1455-1459.
50. Lockhart, P. J., M. A. Steel, M. D. Hendy, and D. Penny. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
51. Luan, Y. X., Y. G. Yao, R. D. Xie, Y. M. Yang, Y. P. Zhang, and W. Y. Yin. 2004. Analysis of 18S rRNA gene of Octostigma sinensis (Projapygoidea: Octostigmatidae) supports the monophyly of Diplura. Pedobiologia 48:453-459.
52. Luan, Y. X., Y. P. Zhang, Q. Y. Yue, J. F. Pang, R. D. Xie, and W. Y. Yin. 2003. Ribosomal DNA gene and phylogenetic relationship of Diplura and lower hexapods. Sci. China Ser. C 46:67-76.
53. Mallatt, J., J. R. Garey, and J. W. Shultz, 2004. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:178-191.
54. Mallatt, J., and J. Sullivan. 1998. 28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1706-1718.
55. Mallatt, J., and C. J. Winchell. 2002. Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:289-301.
56. Manton, S. M. 1972. The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms. Part 10. Locomotory habits, morphology and evolution of the hexapod classes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 51: 203-400.
57. -. 1977. The Arthropoda: habits, functional morphology, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
58. Nardi, F., G. Spinsanti, J. L. Boore, A. Carapelli, R. Dallai, and F. Frati. 2003. Hexapoda origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic? Science 299:1887-1889.
59. Nelles, L., B. L. Fang, G. Volckaert, A. Vandenberghe, and R. De Wachter. 1984. Nucleotide sequence of a crustacean 18S ribosomal RNA gene and secondary structure of eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 8749-8768.
60. Pagés, J. 1997. Notes sur les Diploures Rhabdoures Insectes, Apterygotes no. 1-Diplura Genavensia XXII. Rev. Suisse Zool. 104:869-896.
61. Posada, D., and T. R. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53:793-808.
62. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
63. Rambaut, A., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. Seq-Gen sequence: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
64. Regier, J. C., and J. W. Shultz. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of the major arthropod groups indicates polyphyly of crustaceans and a new hypothesis for the origin of hexapods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:902-913.
65. -. 2001. Elongation factor-2: a useful gene for arthropod phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20:136-148.
66. Regier, J. C., J. W. Shultz, and R. E. Kambic. 2004. Phylogeny of basal hexapod lineages and estimates of divergence times. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97:411-419.
67. Regier, J. C., H. M. Wilson, and J. W. Shultz. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of Myriapoda using three nuclear protein-coding genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34:147-158.
68. Ruppert, E. E., R. S. Fox, and R. D. Barnes. 2004. Invertebrate zoology, a functional evolutionary approach. Thomson, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, Calif.
69. Rusek, J. 1982. Octostigma herbivora n. gen. & sp. (Diplura: Projapygoidea: Octostigmatidae n. fam.) injuring plant roots in the Tonga Islands. N. Z. J. Zool. 9:25-32.
70. Schnare, M. N., S. H. Damberger, M. W. Gray, and R. Gutell. 1996. Comprehensive comparison of structural characteristics in eukaryotic cytoplasmic large subunit (23S-like) ribosomal RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 256:701-719.
71. Shao, H. G., Y. P. Zhang, X. Ke, Q. Y. Yue, and W. Y. Yin. 2000. Sequences of mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase II in Cryptopygus nanjiensis and phylogeny of Apterygota. Sci. China Ser. C 43:589-596.
72. Shao, H. G., Y. P. Zhang, R. D. Xie, and W. Y. Yin. 1999. Mitochondria cytochrome b sequences variation of Protura and molecular systematics of Apterygota. Chin. Sci. Bull. 44:2031-2036.
73. Shultz, J. W., and J. C. Regier. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of arthropods using two nuclear protein-encoding genes supports a crustacean + hexapod clade. Proc. R. Soc. B 267: 1011-1019.
74. Spears, T., and L. G. Abele. 1997. Crustacean phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA. Pp. 169-187 in R. A. Fortey, and R. H. Thomas, eds. Arthropod relationships. Chapman & Hall, London.
75. Štys, P., and S. Bilinski. 1990. Ovariole types and the phylogeny of hexapods. Biol. Rev. 65:401-429.
76. Štys, P., J. Zrzavý, and F. Weyda. 1993. Phylogeny of the Hexapoda and ovarian metamerism. Biol. Rev. 68:365-379.
77. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
78. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pp. 407-514 in D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds. Molecular systematics, 2nd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
79. Turbeville, J. M., D. M. Pfeifer, K. G. Field, and R. A. Raff. 1991. The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8:669-686.
80. Tuxen, S. L. 1964. The Protura. A revision of the species of the world with keys for determination. Hermann, Paris.
81. Whalley, P. 1995. Unfair to ancient fossil springtails! Antenna 19:2-3.
82. Wheeler, W. C., P. Cartwright, and C. Y. Hayashi. 1993. Arthropod phylogeny: a combined approach. Cladistics 9: 1-39.
83. Wheeler, W. C., M. Whiting, Q. D. Wheeler, and J. M. Carpenter. 2001. The phylogeny of the extant Hexapod orders. Cladistics 17:113-169.
84. Wilson, K., V. Cahill, E. Ballment, and J. Benzie. 2000. The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the crustacean Penaeus monodon: are malacostracan crustaceans more closely related to insects than to branchiopods? Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:863-874.
85. Winchell, C. J., A. P. Martin, and J. Mallatt. 2004. Phylogeny of elasmobranchs based on LSU and SSU ribosomal RNA genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:214-224.
86. Winchell, C. J., J. Sullivan, C. B. Cameron, B. J. Swalla, and J. Mallatt. 2002. Evaluating hypotheses of deuterostome phylogeny and chordate evolution with new LSU and SSU ribosomal DNA data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:762-776.
87. Yin, W. Y. 1984. A new idea on phylogeny of Protura with approach to its origin and systematic position. Sci. Sin. Ser. B XXVII: 149-160.
88. -. 1996. New considerations on systematics of Protura. Pp. 60 in Proceedings of XX International Congress of Entomology, Firenze, Italy.
89. Yin, W. Y., R. D. Xie, Y. M. Yang, Q. Y. Yue, and Y. X. Luan. 2002. Analysis of the main characters for regrouping of the class Protura (Hexapoda). Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 27:649-658 [in Chinese].
90. Yin, W. Y., and L. Z. Xue. 1993. Comparative spermatology of Protura and its significance on proturan systematics. Sci. China Ser. B 36:575-587.
91. Zrzavý, J., S. Mihulka, P. Kepka, A. Bezděk, and D. Tietz. 1998. Phylogeny of the Metazoa based on morphological and 18S ribosomal DNA evidence. Cladistics 14:249-285.