Grammar and Feedback: Turning to Language Form in Telecollaboration

Online Intercultural Exchange: An Introduction for Foreign Language Teachers

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 107-126

  Ware, Paige D ^a   Cañado, Maria Luisa Pérez ^b  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449579389     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Appel, C. and Mullen, T. (2000) Pedagogical considerations for a web-based tandem language learning environment. Computers and Education 34, 291-308.
2. Belz, J. (2003) Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology 7 (2), 68-117.
3. Belz, J. and Mueller-Hartmann, A. (2003) Teachers as intercultural learners:Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional faultline. Modern Language Journal 87 (1), 71-89.
4. Berg, E.C. (1999) The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 8, 215-241.
5. Breen, J. and Candlin, D. (1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics 1 (2), 89-112.
6. Brown, H.D. (1994) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (3rd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Canale, M. (1983) From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J.C. Richards and R.W. Schmidt (eds) Language and Communication (pp. 2-27). London: Longman.
8. Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1-47.
9. Chandler, J. (2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error correction for improvement of the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12, 267-296.
10. Chomsky, N. (1964) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.
11. Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Connor, U. and Asenavage, K. (1994) Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing 3 (3), 257-276.
13. Ferris, D. (2002) Treatment of Error in Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
14. Ferris, D. and Roberts, B. (2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10, 161-184.
15. Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K. and Maillet, K. (2001) Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The CULTURA project. Language Learning and Technology 5 (1), 55-102.
16. Horowitz, D. (1986) Process not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly 20, 141-144.
17. Hyland, F. (1998) The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 7 (3), 255-286.
18. Hyland, F. and Hyland, K. (2001) Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (3), 185-212.
19. Hymes, D. (1972) On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds) Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). New York: Penguin.
20. Keh, C. (1990) Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal 44 (4), 294-305.
21. Kern, R. (1995) Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers:Effects on quality and quantity of language production. Modern Language Journal 79 (4), 457-476.
22. Kern, R. (1996) Computer-mediated communication: Using e-mail exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures. In M. Warschauer (ed.) Telecollaboration in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 105-120). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
23. Kern, R. (2000) Literacy and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Kötter, M. (2003) Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in on-line tandems. Language Learning and Technology 7 (2), 145-172.
25. Krashen, S. (1984) Writing, Research, Theory, and Application. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
26. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003) Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Boston: Heinle.
27. Lee, L. (2004) Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the U.S. Language Learning and Technology 8 (1), 83-100.
28. Leki, I. (1991) The preference of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24 (3), 203-218.
29. Levy, M. and Kennedy, C. (2004) A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audio-conferencing in foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology 8 (2), 50-69.
30. Liu, J. and Sadler, R. (2003) The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2, 193-227.
31. Mendonca, C.O. and Johnson, K.E. (1994) Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 23 (4), 745-768.
32. O’Dowd, R. (2003) Understanding the ‘other side’: Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning and Technology 7 (2), 118-144.
33. O’Rourke, B. (2005) Form-focused interaction in on-line tandem learning. CALICO Journal 22 (3), 433-466.
34. Paulus, T. (1999) The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 8, 265-289.
35. Pellettieri, J. (2000) Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M.Warschauer and R. Kern (eds) Network-based Language Teaching:Concepts and Practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Reid, J. (1998) ‘Eye’ learners and ‘ear’ learners: Identifying the language needs of international students and U.S. resident writers. In P. Byrd and J.M. Reid (eds) Grammar in the Composition Classroom: Essays on Teaching ESL for College-bound Students (pp. 3-17). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
37. Robb, T. (2004) Moodle: Avirtual learning environment for the rest of us. TESL-EJ 8 (2), 1-8.
38. Ros i Sole, C. and Truman, M. (2005) Feedback in distance language learning:Current practices and new directions. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley and C. White (eds) Distance Education and Languages: Evolution and Change (pp. 72-91). Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
39. Schwienhorst, K. (2000) Virtual reality and learner autonomy in second language acquisition. Unpublished manuscript, Trinity College, Dublin.
40. Segalowitz, N. and Lightbown, P.M. (1999) Psycholinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19, 43-63.
41. Sotillo, S.M. (2000) Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology 4 (1), 82-119.
42. Stanley, J. (1992) Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing 1 (3), 217-233.
43. Swan, M. (1985a) A critical look at the communicative approach (1). ELT Journal 39 (1), 2-12.
44. Swan, M. (1985b) A critical look at the communicative approach (2). ELT Journal 39 (2), 76-87.
45. Thorne, S. (2003) Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology 7 (2), 38-67.
46. Truscott, J. (1996) The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327-369.
47. Ur, P. (1996) The communicative approach revisited. GRETA. Revista para Profesores de Inglés 4 (2), 5-7.
48. Villamil, O.S. and Guerrero, M.C.M. (1996) Peer revision in the L2 classroom:Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behaviour. Journal of Second Language Writing 5 (1), 51-75.
49. Villamil, O.S. and Guerrero, M.C.M. (2006) Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland (eds) Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 23-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Ware, P. (2005) ‘Missed communication’ in on-line communication: Tensions in fostering successful on-line interactions. Language Learning and Technology 9 (2), 64-89.
51. Ware, P. and Kramsch, C. (2005) Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal 89 (2), 190-205.
52. Warschauer, M. (1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal 13 (2/3), 7-26.
53. White, L., Spada, S., Lightbown, P.M., and Ranta, L. (1991) Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics 12 (4), 416-432.
54. Zhang, S. (1995) Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 4, 209-222.