The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 255-286

  Hyland, Fiona ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013094624     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brannon, L., & Knoblauch, C. H. (1982). On students' rights to their own texts: A model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33, 157-66.
2. Cardelle, M., & Corno, L. (1981). Effects on second language learning of variations in written feedback on homework assignments. TESOL Quarterly 15, 251-261.
3. Caulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 181-187.
4. Chaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students' composition revisions. RELC Journal, 15, 1-15.
5. Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257-276.
7. Cumming, A. (1985). Teachers' procedures for responding to the writing of students of a second language. In M. Maguire & A. Par (Eds.), Patterns of development (pp 58-75). Montreal: Canadian Council of Teachers of English.
8. Daiker, D. (1989). Learning to praise. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response (pp. 103-113). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
9. Eskey, D. E. (1983). Meanwhile back in the real world ... Accuracy and fluency in second language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 315-323.
10. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analysing revision. College Composition and Communication , 32, 400-414.
11. Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990) Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. (pp. 178-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
13. Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
14. Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155-182.
15. Flower, L. S., Hayes, J. R, Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-54.
16. Freedman, S. W. (1987). Response to student writing. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
17. Goldstein, L. M., & Conrad, S. M. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 443-460.
18. Hayes, M. F., & Daiker, D. (1984). Using protocol analysis in evaluating responses to student writing. Freshman English News, 13, 1-5.
19. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
20. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 287-308.
21. Kelly, P. (1986). How do ESL writers compose? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 94-119.
22. Kepner, C. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.
23. Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In B Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 57-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24 , 203-218.
25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analysing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd Edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
27. Master, P. (1995). Consciousness raising and article pedagogy. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays in research and pedagogy (pp. 183-205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Mazano, R. J., & Arthur, S. (1977). Teacher comments on student essays: It doesn't matter what you say. ERIC Document 147 864.
29. Mendonca, C.O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 28 , 745-768.
30. Mohanan, B. (1984). Revision strategies of basic and competent writers as they write for different audiences. Research in the teaching of English, 18, 288-305.
31. Nelson, G., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135-141.
32. Onore, C. (1989). The student, the teacher, and the text: Negotiating meanings through response and revision. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response (pp. 231-257). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
33. Partridge, K. L. (1981). A comparison of the effectiveness of peer versus teacher evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written compositions, MA. in TESL thesis. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa. Department of English as a Second Language.
34. Perl, S. (1979). The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
35. Prior, P. (1991). Contextualising writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8, 267-310.
36. Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16 , 355-365.
37. Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability and composing strategies. A study of ESL college students. Language Learning, 37, 439-468.
38. Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 273-294.
39. Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 46-70.
40. Searle, D., & Dillon, D. (1980). The message of marking: Teacher written responses to student writing at intermediate grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 233-242.
41. Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378-388.
42. Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-56.
43. Sperling, M., & Freedman, S. W. (1987). A good girl writes like a good girl. Written Communication, 4, 342-369.
44. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327-369.
45. Wall, S. V., & Hull, G. A. (1989). The semantics of error: What do teachers know? In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response (pp. 261-292). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
46. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly , 19, 79-101.
47. Zhang, S. (1985). The differential effects of sources of corrective feedback on ESL writing proficiency. Occasional Paper Series no 9. Honolulu. University of Hawaii at Manoa: Department of English as a Second Language.
48. Zhang, S. (1995). Re-examining the affective advantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209-222.