Pedagogical considerations for a web-based tandem language learning environment

Computers and Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 291-308

  Appel, Christine ^a   Mullen, Tony ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347899480     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1315(99)00051-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Appel, M. C. (1999). Tandem language learning by e-mail: some basic principles and a case study, CLCS Occasional Paper No.54. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
2. Appel, M. C., Mullen, T. (to appear) (1998). In: Strotmann, B., A common gateway interface for tandem language learning. Proceedings of the International Congress on Technology in Teaching, jointly organised by IATEFL Computer SIG, TESOL-Spain and Universidad Europea de Madrid, 20-22 November.
3. Austin R., Mendlick F. E-mail in modern language development. ReCALL. 9:1993;19-23.
4. Brammerts, H. (1996). In: D. Little & H. Brammerts, Tandem language learning via the Internet and the International E-mail Tandem Network. pp. 9-21.
5. Calvert M. Working in tandem: peddling an old idea. Language Learning Journal. 6:1992;17-19.
6. Canvar W.B., Trenkle J.M. N-gram-based text categorization. Proceedings of Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, Las Vegas :1994;161-175.
7. Dam L. Learner autonomy 3: from theory to classroom practice. 1995;Authentik, Dublin.
8. Dam L., Legenhausen L., Wolff D. Text production in the foreign language classroom and the word processor. System. 18:1990;325-334.
9. Esch E. Promoting learner autonomy: criteria for the selection of appropriate methods. Pemberton R., Li E.S.L., Or W.W.F., Pierson H.D. Taking control, autonomy in language learning. 1996;Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.
10. Kellogg R.T. The psychology of writing. 1994;Oxford, Oxford University press.
11. Little D.G. Learner autonomy 1: definitions, issues, and problems. 1991;Dublin, Authentik.
12. Little, D. G. (1997). In: Kupetz, R., The role of writing in second language learning: some neo-Vygotskian reflections. Vom Gelenkten zum freien schreiben im fremdsprachenunterricht. Peter Lang.
13. Little, D., Brammerts, H. (1996). A guide to language learning in tandem via the Internet. CLCS Occasional Paper No.46. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies. ISSN 0332 3889.
14. Little, D., et al. (1999). Evaluating tandem language learning by e-mail. Report on a bilateral project, CLCS Occasional Paper No.55. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies.
15. Moran C., Hawisher G.E. The rhetorics and languages of electronic mail. Snyder I. Page to screen. 1998;London and New York, Routledge.
16. Nerbonne J., Dokter D., Smit P. Morphological processing and computer-assisted language learning. Computer-Assisted Language Learning. 11:(5):1998;421-437. special issue on French edited by Michael Zock.
17. Noord, G. van, TextCat. Available: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/TextCat/, 25 March, 1999.
18. Singleton D. Learning and processing L2 vocabulary. Language Teaching. 30:1997;213-225.
19. St John E., Cash D. German language learning via e-mail: a case study. ReCALL. 7:(2):1995;47-51.
20. Snyder I. Beyond the hype: reassessing hypertext. Snyder I. Page to screen. 1998;London and New York, Routledge.
21. Vygotsky L. Mind in society. 1978;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
22. Warschauer M. Computer-assisted language learning: an introduction. Fotos S. Multimedia language teaching. 1996;3-20 Logos International, Tokyo.
23. Woodin J. E-mail tandem learning and the communicative curriculum. ReCALL. 9:(1):1997;22-33.