Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 90-121+372

  Golato, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344153831     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/24.1.90     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Andersen, J. R. 1974. 'Verbatim and propostional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memory.' Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 149-62.
2. Anderson, J. R. and G. Bower. 1974. 'A propositional theory of recognition memory.' Memory and Cognition 2: 406-12.
3. Aston, G. 1995. 'Say "Thank you": Some pragmatic constraints in conversational closings.' Applied Linguistics 16/1: 57-86.
4. Atkinson, J. M. and J. Heritage, (eds) 1984. Structures of Social Action, Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Auer, P. and S. Uhmann. 1982. 'Aspekte der konversationellen Organisation von Bewer-tungen [Aspects of the conversational organisation of assessments].' Deutsche Sprache 10: 1-32.
6. Barnlund, D. C. and S. Araki. 1985. 'Inter-cultural encounters: the management of compliments by Japanese and Americans.' Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 16/1: 9-26.
7. Beebe, L. M. and M. C. Cummings. 1985. 'Speech act performance: A function of the data collection procedure?' Paper presented at the TESOL Convention, New York.
8. Beebe, L. M. and M. C. Cummings. 1996. 'Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance' in S. M. Gass and N. Joyce (eds): Speech Act Across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 65-86.
9. Billmyer, K. and M. Varghese. 2000. 'Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests.' Applied Linguistics 21/4: 517-52.
10. Blum-Kulka, S., J. House, and G. Kasper. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Bodman, J. and M. Eisenstein. 1988. 'May God increase your bounty: The expression of gratitude in English by native and non-native speakers.' Cross Currents 15/1: 1-21.
12. Chen, R. 1993. 'Responding to compliments. A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers.' Journal of Pragmatics 20/1: 49-75.
13. Drew, P. and J. Heritage, (eds) 1992. Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Egbert, M. M. 1996. 'Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator "bitte"?' Language in Society 25/4: 587-612.
16. Golato, A. 2000. 'Pragmatic interference and complimenis.' Paper presented at the AAAL Annual Convention: Crossing Boundaries, in Vancouver, British Columbia, 11-14 March 2000.
17. Golato, A. 2002. 'German compliment responses.' Journal of Pragmatics 34: 547-71.
18. Graesser, A. C. and G. Mandler. 1975. 'Recognition memory for the meaning and surface structure of sentences.' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 104: 238-48.
19. Gumperz, J. J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hanson, V. L. and U. Bellugi. 1982. 'On the role of sign order and morphological structure in memory for American Sign Language sentences.' Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21: 621-33.
21. Hartford, B. and K. Bardovi-Harlig. 1992. 'Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics' in L. Bouton and Y. Kachru (eds): Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph 3. Urbana-Champaign, IL: DEIL. 33-52.
22. Hatch, E. M. and A. Lazaraton. 1994. The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
23. Herbert, R. K. 1990. 'Sex-based differences in compliment behavior.' Language in Society 19: 201-24.
24. Herbert, R. K. and H. S. Straight. 1989. 'Compliment-rejection versus compliment-avoidance: listener-based versus speaker-based pragmatic strategies. ' Language and Communication 9/1: 35-47.
25. Heritage, J. 1984. Carfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press, in association with Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
26. Hinkel, E. 1997. 'Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data.' Applied Linguistics 18/1: 1-23.
27. Holmes, J. 1986. 'Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English.' Anthropological Linguistics 28/4: 485-508.
28. Holmes, J. 1991. 'Review of cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies.' Language in Society 20: 119-26.
29. Jefferson, G. 1980. 'The abominable Ne?. An Exploration of post-response pursuit of response' in P. Schröder and H. Steger (eds): Dialogforschung. Jahrbuch 1980 des Instituts für deutsche Sprache. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann. pp. 53-88.
30. Jefferson, G. 1983. Two explorations of the organization of overlapping talk in conversation.' Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28.
31. Jefferson, G. 1985. 'An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter' in T. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3). London: Academic Press. pp. 25-34.
32. Johnson-Laird, P. N. and R. Stevenson. 1970. 'Memory for syntax.' Nature 227: 412.
33. Johnston, B., G. Kasper, and S. Ross. 1998. 'Effects of rejoinders in production questionnaires.' Applied Linguistics 19/2: 157-82.
34. Kasper, G. 2000. 'Data collection in pragmatics research' in H. Spencery-Oatey (ed.): Culturally Speaking. Managing Rapport Through Talk across Cultures. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 316-41.
35. Kasper, G. and M. Dahl. 1991. 'Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics.' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13/2: 215-47.
36. Knapp, M. L., R. Hopper, and R. A. Bell. 1984. 'Compliments: a descriptive taxonomy.' Journal of Communication 34/4: 12-32.
37. Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
38. Labov, W. 1984. 'Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation' in J. Baugh, and J. Sherzer (eds): Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Clifts, NJ: Prentice Hall. pp. 28-53.
39. Lehrer, A. 1989. 'Remembering and representing prose: quoted speech as a data source.' Discourse Processes 12: 105-25.
40. Levinson, S. C. 1992. 'Activity types and language' in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds): Talk at Work. Interactions in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 265-399.
41. Liu, D. 1995. 'Sociocultural transfer and its, effect on second language speaker's communication.' International Journal of Intercultural Relations 19/2, Spring: 253-65.
42. Manes, J. 1983. 'Compliments: a mirror of cultural values' in N. Wolfson and E. Judd (eds): Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA; London; Tokyo: Newbury House Publishers, pp. 96-102.
43. Markee, N. 2002. 'A conversation analytic perspective on quantification and generalizability in applied linguistics and SLA.' ILTA/AAAL Plenary Panel American Association of Applied Linguistics Annual Conference: (Re)Interpreting Applied Linguistics, Salt Lake City, UT, April 6-9.
44. Moerman, M. 1974. 'Accomplishing ethnicity' in R. Turner (ed.): Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 54-68.
45. Pomerantz, A. 1978. 'Compliment responses. Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints' in J. Schenkein (ed.): Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press. pp. 79-112.
46. Pomerantz, A. 1984. 'Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes' in J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds): Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 225-46.
47. Rintell, E. M. and C. J. Mitchell. 1989. 'Studying requests and apologies: An inquiry into method' in S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper (eds): Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. pp. 248-72.
48. Rose, K. 1992. 'Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics' in L. Bouton and Y. Kachru (eds): Pragmatics and Language Learning 3. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, pp. 35-52.
49. Rose, K. 1994. 'On validity of discourse completion tests in non-Western contexts.' Applied Linguistics 15/1: 1-14.
50. Rose, K. R. and Ono, R. 1995. 'Eliciting speech act data in Japanese: The effect of questionnaire type.' Language Learning 45/2: 191-223.
51. Sachs, J. D. S. 1967. 'Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.' Perception and Psychophysics 2: 437-42.
52. Sachs, J. D. S. 1974. 'Memory in reading and listening in discourse.' Memory and Cognition 2: 95-100.
53. Sacks, H. 1995. Lectures on Conversation, ed. by Gail Jefferson, introduction by Emanuel Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. 'A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.' Language 50/4: 696-735.
55. Saito, H. and M. Beecken. 1997. 'An approach to instruction of pragmatic aspects: implications of pragmatic transfer by American learners of Japanese.' Modern Language Journal 81/3: 363-77.
56. Schegloff, E. A. 1972. 'Sequencing in Conversational Openings' in J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds): Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 346-80.
57. Schegloff, E. A. 1973. 'Opening up closings.' Semiotica 8/4: 289-327.
58. Schegloff, E. A. 1984. 'On some questions and ambiguities in conversation' in J. M. Atkin-son and J. Heritage (eds): Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 28-52.
59. Schegloff, E. A. 1987. 'Recycled turn beginnings: a precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organisation' in G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds): Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 70-85.
60. Schegloff, E. A. 1993. 'Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation.' Research on Language and Social Interaction 26/1: 99-128.
61. Schegloff, E. A. 1995. 'Discourse as an inter-actional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action.' Research on Language and Social Interaction 28/3: 185-211.
62. Schegloff, E. A. 1996. 'Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: a partial sketch of a systematics' in B. A. Fox (ed.): Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 437-485.
63. Silverman, D. 1998. Harvey Sacks. Social Science & Conversation Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Streeck, J. 1979. 'Sandwich, good for you. Zur pragmatischen und konversationellen Analyse von Bewertungen im institutionellen Diskurs in der Schule' in J. Dittmann (ed.): Arbeiten zur Konversationsanalyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 235-57.
65. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. in press. A conversation analytic study of telephone conversation openings between native and nonnative speakers. Journal of Pragmatics.
66. Wanner, E. 1974. On Remembering, Forgetting, and Understanding Sentences. The Hague: Mouton.
67. Wieland, M. 1995. 'Complimenting behavior in French/American cross-cultural dinner conversations.' The French Review 68/5: 796-812.
68. Wildner-Bassett, M. B. 1989. 'Coexisting discourse worlds and the study of pragmatic aspects of learners' interlanguage' in W. Olesky (ed.): Contrastive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 251-75.
69. Wolfson, N. 1989. Perspectives. Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
70. Wolfson, N. and J. Manes. 1980. The compliment as a social strategy.' Papers in Linguistics 13/3: 391-410.
71. Yuan, Y. 1996. 'Responding to compliments: a contrastive study of English pragmatics of advanced Chinese speakers of English.' Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 20/2: 861-72.
72. Yuan, Y. 2001. 'An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversations.' Journal of Pragmatics 33: 271-92.