The direct binding of Mrc1, a checkpoint mediator, to Mcm6, a replication helicase, is essential for the replication checkpoint against methyl methanesulfonate-induced stress

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 18, 2009, Pages 5008-5019

  Komata, Makiko ^a   Bando, Masashige ^a   Araki, Hiroyuki ^b   Shirahige, Katsuhiko ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENETICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER PROTEIN; DNA; HELICASE; HYBRID PROTEIN; HYDROXYUREA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEIN 6; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN MRC1; RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; MCM6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MRC1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; RNA TRANSLATION; STRESS; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA REPLICATION; HYDROXYUREA; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 70249118531     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01934-08     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alcasabas, A. A., A. J. Osborn, J. Bachant, F. Hu, P. J. Werler, K. Bousset, K. Furuya, J. F. Diffley, A. M. Carr, and S. J. Elledge. 2001. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:958-965.
2. Blastyák, A., L. Pintér, I. Unk, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, and L. Haracska. 2007. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol. Cell 28:167-175. (Pubitemid 47542303)
3. Bochman, M. L., and A. Schwacha. 2008. The Mcm2-7 complex has in vitro helicase activity. Mol. Cell 31:287-293.
4. Branzei, D., and M. Foiani. 2005. The DNA damage response during DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17:568-575.
5. Cortez, D. 2005. Unwind and slow down: checkpoint activation by helicase and polymerase uncoupling. Genes Dev. 19:1007-1012. (Pubitemid 40632445)
6. Fan, H. Y., K. K. Cheng, and H. L. Klein. 1996. Mutations in the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery suppress the hyperrecombination mutant hpr1 delta of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 142:749-759. (Pubitemid 26162522)
7. Foss, E. J. 2001. Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157:567-577. (Pubitemid 32165016)
8. Gambus, A., R. C. Jones, A. Sanchez-Diaz, M. Kanemaki, F. van Deursen, R. D. Edmondson, and K. Labib. 2006. GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:358-366.
9. Harper, J. W., and S. J. Elledge. 2007. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol. Cell 28:739-745. (Pubitemid 350217064)
10. Homesley, L., M. Lei, Y. Kawasaki, S. Sawyer, T. Christensen, and B. K. Tye. 2000. Mcm10 and the MCM2-7 complex interact to initiate DNA synthesis and to release replication factors from origins. Genes Dev. 14:913-926. (Pubitemid 30253001)
11. Hori, Y., K. Shirahige, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, and H. Yoshikawa. 1996. Characterization of a novel CDC gene (ORC1) partly homologous to CDC6 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:409-418. (Pubitemid 26089657)
12. Ishimi, Y. 1997. A DNA helicase activity is associated with an MCM4, -6, and -7 protein complex. J. Biol. Chem. 272:24508-24513. (Pubitemid 27418662)
13. Kanemaki, M., A. Sanchez-Diaz, A. Gambus, and K. Labib. 2003. Functional proteomic identification of DNA replication proteins by induced proteolysis in vivo. Nature 423:720-724. (Pubitemid 36735689)
14. Kanoh, Y., K. Tamai, and K. Shirahige. 2006. Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks. Gene 377:88-95. (Pubitemid 44081849)
15. Kaplan, D. L., M. J. Davey, and M. O'Donnell. 2003. Mcm4, 6, 7 uses a "pump in ring" mechanism to unwind DNA by steric exclusion and actively translocate along a duplex. J. Biol. Chem. 278:49171-49182.
16. Katou, Y., Y. Kanoh, M. Bando, H. Noguchi, H. Tanaka, T. Ashikari, K. Sugimoto, and K. Shirahige. 2003. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424:1078-1083. (Pubitemid 37064311)
17. Labib, K., and B. Hodgson. 2007. Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time? EMBO Rep. 8:346-353. (Pubitemid 46511035)
18. Labib, K., J. A. Tercero, and J. F. Diffley. 2000. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. Science 288:1643-1647. (Pubitemid 30387430)
19. Lee, J., D. A. Gold, A. Shevchenko, A. Shevchenko, and W. G. Dunphy. 2005. Roles of replication fork-interacting and Chk1-activating domains from Claspin in a DNA replication checkpoint response. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:5269-5282. (Pubitemid 41566838)
20. Lee, S. J., J. K. Duong, and D. F. Stern. 2004. A Ddc2-Rad53 fusion protein can bypass the requirements for RAD9 and MRC1 in Rad53 activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:5443-5455.
21. Longtine, M. S., A. McKenzie III, D. J. Demarini, N. G. Shah, A. Wach, A. Brachat, P. Philippsen, and J. R. Pringle.1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953-961.
22. Lopes, M., C. Cotta-Ramusino, A. Pellicioli, G. Liberi, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, C. S. Newlon, and M. Foiani. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412:557-561. (Pubitemid 32743836)
23. Lou, H., M. Komata, Y. Katou, Z. Guan, C. C. Reis, M. Budd, K. Shirahige, and J. L. Campbell. 2008. Mrc1 and DNA polymerase epsilon function together in linking DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint. Mol. Cell 32:106-117.
24. Melo, J., and D. Toczyski. 2002. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:237-245.
25. Mitchell, D. A., T. K. Marshall, and R. J. Deschenes. 1993. Vectors for the inducible overexpression of glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins in yeast. Yeast 9:715-722. (Pubitemid 23228871)
26. Moyer, S. E., P. W. Lewis, and M. R. Botchan. 2006. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:10236-10241.
27. Nedelcheva, M. N., A. Roguev, L. B. Dolapchiev, A. Shevchenko, H. B. Taskov, A. Shevchenko, A. F. Stewart, and S. S. Stoynov. 2005. Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex. J. Mol. Biol. 347:509-521.
28. Neuwald, A. F., L. Aravind, J. L. Spouge, and E. V. Koonin. 1999. AAA+: a class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 9:27-43.
29. Noguchi, E., C. Noguchi, W. H. McDonald, J. R. Yates III, and P. Russell. 2004. Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:8342-8855. (Pubitemid 39245057)
30. Osborn, A. J., and S. J. Elledge. 2003. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17:1755-1767.
31. Pacek, M., A. V. Tutter, Y. Kubota, H. Takisawa, and J. C. Walter. 2006. Localization of MCM2-7, Cdc45, and GINS to the site of DNA unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol. Cell 21:581-587. (Pubitemid 43228013)
32. Pacek, M., and J. C. Walter. 2004. A requirement for MCM7 and Cdc45 in chromosome unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. EMBO J. 23: 3667-3676. (Pubitemid 39336288)
33. Paulovich, A. G., and L. H. Hartwell. 1995. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 82:841-847.
34. Paulovich, A. G., R. U. Margulies, B. M. Garvik, and L. H. Hartwell. 1997. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics 145:45-62.
35. Shechter, D., C. Y. Ying, and J. Gautier. 2004. DNA unwinding is an Mcm complex-dependent and ATP hydrolysis-dependent process. J. Biol. Chem. 279:45586-45593. (Pubitemid 39491545)
36. Shimomura, T., S. Ando, K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 1998. Functional and physical interaction between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the yeast checkpoint pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:5485-5491. (Pubitemid 28388131)
37. Shirahige, K., Y. Hori, K. Shiraishi, M. Yamashita, K. Takahashi, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, and H. Yoshikawa. 1998. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395:618-621. (Pubitemid 28475718)
38. Tercero, J. A., and J. F. Diffley. 2001. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412:553-557.
39. Tercero, J. A., K. Labib, and J. F. Diffley. 2000. DNA synthesis at individual replication forks requires the essential initiation factor Cdc45p. EMBO J. 19:2082-2093.
40. Tercero, J. A., M. P. Longhese, and J. F. Diffley. 2003. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11:1323-1336. (Pubitemid 36645150)
41. Torres-Ramos, C. A., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2002. Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:2419-2426. (Pubitemid 34224644)
42. Wyatt, M. D., and D. L. Pittman. 2006. Methylation agents and DNA repair response: methylated bases and sources of strand breaks. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19:1580-1594.
43. Yamashita, M., Y. Hori, T. Shinomiya, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, H. Yoshikawa, and K. Shirahige. 1997. The efficiency and timing of initiation of replication of multiple replicons of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome VI. Genes Cells 2:655-665. (Pubitemid 127688611)
44. Yoo, H. Y., S. Y. Jeong, and W. G. Dunphy. 2006. Site-specific phosphorylation of a checkpoint mediator protein controls its responses to different DNA structures. Genes Dev. 20:772-783.