Adaptive-control model for neutrophil orientation in the direction of chemical gradients

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 96, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 3897-3916

  Irimia, Daniel ^a   Balázsi, Gábor ^b   Agrawal, Nitin ^a   Toner, Mehmet ^a  

^a SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; CELL MOTION; CELL POLARITY; CELL STRUCTURE; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROTUBULE; NEUTROPHIL; STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYTOLOGY; CYTOSKELETON; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; NEUTROPHIL CHEMOTAXIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

CHEMOTACTIC FACTOR;

BIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES; CHEMOTACTIC FACTORS; CHEMOTAXIS, LEUKOCYTE; CYTOSKELETON; HUMANS; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; MICROTUBULES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEUTROPHILS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 68049142313     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3967     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Nathan, C. 2006. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6:173-182.
2. Zigmond, S. H. 1974. Mechanisms of sensing chemical gradients by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Nature. 249:450-452.
3. Wu, D. 2005. Signaling mechanisms for regulation of chemotaxis. Cell Res. 15:52-56.
4. Charest, P. G., and R. A. Firtel. 2006. Feedback signaling controls leading-edge formation during chemotaxis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16:339-347.
5. Xu, J., F. Wang, A. Van Keymeulen, P. Herzmark, A. Straight, et al. 2003. Divergent signals and cytoskeletal assemblies regulate self-organizing polarity in neutrophils. Cell. 114:201-214.
6. Turing, A. M. 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B. 237:37-72.
7. Levchenko, A., and P. A. Iglesias. 2002. Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. Biophys. J. 82:50-63.
8. Levine, H., D. A. Kessler, and W. J. Rappel. 2006. Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:9761-9766.
9. Beta, C., G. Amselem, and E. Bodenschatz. 2008. A bistable mechanism for directional sensing. N. J. Phys. 10:083015.
10. Mori, Y., A. Jilkine, and L. Edelstein-Keshet. 2008. Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. Biophys. J. 94:3684-3697.
11. Dawes, A. T., and L. Edelstein-Keshet. 2007. Phosphoinositides and rho proteins spatially regulate actin polymerization to initiate and maintain directed movement in a one-dimensional model of a motile cell. Biophys. J. 92:744-768.
12. Rappel, W. J., P. J. Thomas, H. Levine, and W. F. Loomis. 2002. Establishing direction during chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells. Biophys. J. 83:1361-1367.
13. Brandman, O., J. E. Ferrell, Jr., R. Li, and T. Meyer. 2005. Interlinked fast and slow positive feedback loops drive reliable cell decisions. Science. 310:496-498.
14. Gerisch, G., D. Malchow, and B. Hess. 1974. Cell communication and cyclic-AMP regulation during aggregation aggregating of the slime mold, Dictyostelium discoideum. In Biochemistry of Sensory Functions. L. Jaenicke, editor. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 279-294.
15. Alon, U., M. G. Surette, N. Barkai, and S. Leibler. 1999. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 397:168-171.
16. Samadani, A., J. Mettetal, and A. van Oudenaarden. 2006. Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:11549-11554.
17. Rappel, W. J., and H. Levine. 2008. Receptor noise and directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:228101.
18. van Haastert, P. J. M., and M. Postma. 2007. Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection. Biophys. J. 93:1787-1796.
19. Keenan, T. M., and A. Folch. 2008. Biomolecular gradients in cell culture systems. Lab Chip. 8:34-57.
20. Li Jeon, N., H. Baskaran, S. K. Dertinger, G. M. Whitesides, L. Van de Water, et al. 2002. Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:826-830.
21. Huxley, A. F. 1964. Excitation and conduction in nerve: quantitative analysis. Science. 145:1154-1159.
22. Berg, H. C., and P. M. Tedesco. 1975. Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72:3235-3239.
23. Klipp, E., B. Nordlander, R. Kruger, P. Gennemark, and S. Hohmann. 2005. Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock. Nat. Biotechnol. 23:975-982.
24. Mettetal, J. T., D. Muzzey, C. Gomez-Uribe, and A. van Oudenaarden. 2008. The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 319:482-484.
25. Irimia, D., S. Y. Liu, W. G. Tharp, A. Samadani, M. Toner, et al. 2006. Microfluidic system for measuring neutrophil migratory responses to fast switches of chemical gradients. Lab Chip. 6:191-198.
26. Ramsey, S., D. Orrell, and H. Bolouri. 2005. Dizzy: stochastic simulation of large-scale genetic regulatory networks. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 3:415-436.
27. Gillespie, D. T. 2007. Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58:35-55.
28. Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Techn. J. 27:379-423.
29. Balazsi, G., A. Cornell-Bell, A. B. Neiman, and F. Moss. 2001. Synchronization of hyperexcitable systems with phase-repulsive coupling. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 64:041912.
30. Mardia, K. V., and P. E. Jupp. 1999. Directional Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, London.
31. Narendra, K. S. 1991. The maturing of adaptive control P. V. Kokotovic, editor. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
32. Acar, M., A. Becskei, and A. van Oudenaarden. 2005. Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions. Nature. 435:228-232.
33. Beta, C., D. Wyatt, W. J. Rappel, and E. Bodenschatz. 2007. Flow photolysis for spatiotemporal stimulation of single cells. Anal. Chem. 79:3940-3944.
34. Moghe, P. V., and R. T. Tranquillo. 1995. Stochasticity in membranelocalized "ligand-receptor-G protein"' binding: consequences for leukocyte movement behavior. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 23:257-267.
35. Zigmond, S. H. 1977. Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors. J. Cell Biol. 75:606-616.
36. Herzmark, P., K. Campbell, F. Wang, K. Wong, H. El-Samad, et al. 2007. Bound attractant at the leading vs. the trailing edge determines chemotactic prowess. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:13349-13354.
37. Insall, R., and N. Andrew. 2007. Chemotaxis in Dictyostelium: how to walk straight using parallel pathways. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10:578-581.
38. Song, L., S. M. Nadkarni, H. U. Bodeker, C. Beta, A. Bae, et al. 2006. Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis: threshold for directed motion. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 85:981-989.
39. Golding, I., J. Paulsson, S. M. Zawilski, and E. C. Cox. 2005. Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria. Cell. 123:1025-1036.
40. Raj, A., C. S. Peskin, D. Tranchina, D. Y. Vargas, and S. Tyagi. 2006. Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol. 4:e309.
41. Blake, W. J., G. Balazsi, M. A. Kohanski, F. J. Isaacs, K. F. Murphy, et al. 2006. Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. Mol. Cell. 24:853-865.
42. Blake, W. J., M. Kærn, C. R. Cantor, and J. J. Collins. 2003. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature. 422:633-637.
43. Raser, J. M., and E. K. O'Shea. 2004. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science. 304:1811-1814.
44. Levsky, J. M., S. M. Shenoy, R. C. Pezo, and R. H. Singer. 2002. Single-cell gene expression profiling. Science. 297:836-840.
45. Cai, L., N. Friedman, and X. S. Xie. 2006. Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature. 440:358-362.
46. Kirschner, M., and T. Mitchison. 1986. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell. 45:329-342.
47. Nath, J., M. Flavin, and J. I. Gallin. 1982. Tubulin tyrosinolation in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes: studies in normal subjects and in patients with the Chediak-Higashi syndrome. J. Cell Biol. 95:519-526.
48. Niggli, V. 2003. Signaling to migration in neutrophils: importance of localized pathways. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 35:1619-1638.
49. Mikhailov, A., and G. G. Gundersen. 1998. Relationship between microtubule dynamics and lamellipodium formation revealed by direct imaging of microtubules in cells treated with nocodazole or taxol. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 41:325-340.
50. Euteneuer, U., and M. Schliwa. 1992. Mechanism of centrosome positioning during the wound response in BSC-1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 116:1157-1166.
51. Ueda, M., R. Graf, H. K. MacWilliams, M. Schliwa, and U. Euteneuer. 1997. Centrosome positioning and directionality of cell movements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:9674-9678.
52. de Anda, F. C., G. Pollarolo, J. S. Da Silva, P. G. Camoletto, F. Feiguin, et al. 2005. Centrosome localization determines neuronal polarity. Nature. 436:704-708.
53. Servant, G., O. D. Weiner, E. R. Neptune, J.W. Sedat, and H. R. Bourne. 1999. Dynamics of a chemoattractant receptor in living neutrophils during chemotaxis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:1163-1178.
54. Chuntharapai, A., and K. J. Kim. 1995. Regulation of the expression of IL-8 receptor A/B by IL-8: possible functions of each receptor. J. Immunol. 155:2587-2594.
55. Samanta, A. K., J. J. Oppenheim, and K. Matsushima. 1989. Identification and characterization of specific receptors for monocyte-derived neutrophil chemotactic factor (MDNCF) on human neutrophils. J. Exp. Med. 169:1185-1189.
56. Samanta, A. K., J. J. Oppenheim, and K. Matsushima. 1990. Interleukin 8 (monocyte-derived neutrophil chemotactic factor) dynamically regulates its own receptor expression on human neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 265:183-189.
57. Arrieumerlou, C., and T. Meyer. 2005. A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. Dev. Cell. 8:215-227.
58. Postma, M., J. Roelofs, J. Goedhart, T. W. Gadella, A. J. Visser, et al. 2003. Uniform cAMP stimulation of Dictyostelium cells induces localized patches of signal transduction and pseudopodia. Mol. Biol. Cell. 14:5019-5027.
59. Gardiner, E. M., K. N. Pestonjamasp, B. P. Bohl, C. Chamberlain, K. M. Hahn, et al. 2002. Spatial and temporal analysis of Rac activation during live neutrophil chemotaxis. Curr. Biol. 12:2029-2034.
60. Zhelev, D. V., A. M. Alteraifi, and D. Chodniewicz. 2004. Controlled pseudopod extension of human neutrophils stimulated with different chemoattractants. Biophys. J. 87:688-695.
61. Xu, J., A. Van Keymeulen, N. M. Wakida, P. Carlton, M. W. Berns, et al. 2007. Polarity reveals intrinsic cell chirality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:9296-9300.
62. Insall, R. H., and O. D. Weiner. 2001. PIP3, PIP2, and cell movement-similar messages, different meanings? Dev. Cell. 1:743-747.
63. Nishita, M., C. Tomizawa, M. Yamamoto, Y. Horita, K. Ohashi, et al. 2005. Spatial and temporal regulation of cofilin activity by LIM kinase and slingshot is critical for directional cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 171:349-359.
64. Mouneimne, G., V. DesMarais, M. Sidani, E. Scemes, W. Wang, et al. 2006. Spatial and temporal control of cofilin activity is required for directional sensing during chemotaxis. Curr. Biol. 16:2193-2205.
65. Hirayama, A., R. Adachi, S. Otani, T. Kasahara, and K. Suzuki. 2007. Cofilin plays a critical role in IL-8-dependent chemotaxis of neutrophilic HL-60 cells through changes in phosphorylation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 81:720-728.
66. Cassimeris, L. U., P. Wadsworth, and E. D. Salmon. 1986. Dynamics of microtubule depolymerization in monocytes. J. Cell Biol. 102:2023-2032.
67. Eddy, R. J., L. M. Pierini, and F. R. Maxfield. 2002. Microtubule asymmetry during neutrophil polarization and migration. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:4470-4483.
68. Rich, A. M., and S. T. Hoffstein. 1981. Inverse correlation between neutrophil microtubule numbers and enhanced random migration. J. Cell Sci. 48:181-191.
69. Desai, A., and T. J. Mitchison. 1997. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:83-117.
70. Gundersen, G. G., E. R. Gomes, and Y. Wen. 2004. Cortical control of microtubule stability and polarization. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:106-112.
71. Watanabe, T., J. Noritake, and K. Kaibuchi. 2005. Regulation of microtubules in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 15:76-83.
72. Wadsworth, P., and D. P. Bottaro. 1996. Microtubule dynamic turnover is suppressed during polarization and stimulated in hepatocyte growth factor scattered Madin-Darby canine kidney epithelial cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 35:225-236.
73. Witte, H., D. Neukirchen, and F. Bradke. 2008. Microtubule stabilization specifies initial neuronal polarization. J. Cell Biol. 180:619-632.
74. Varnum-Finney, B., K. B. Edwards, E. Voss, and D. R. Soll. 1987. Amebae of Dictyostelium discoideum respond to an increasing temporal gradient of the chemoattractant cAMP with a reduced frequency of turning: evidence for a temporal mechanism in ameboid chemotaxis. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 8:7-17.
75. Ridley, A. J., M. A. Schwartz, K. Burridge, R. A. Firtel, M. H. Ginsberg, et al. 2003. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science. 302:1704-1709.
76. Etienne-Manneville, S., and A. Hall. 2002. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature. 420:629-635.
77. Gundersen, G. G., and T. A. Cook. 1999. Microtubules and signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11:81-94.
78. Gundersen, G. G. 2002. Microtubule capture: IQGAP and CLIP-170 expand the repertoire. Curr. Biol. 12:R645-R647.
79. Perez, F., G. S. Diamantopoulos, R. Stalder, and T. E. Kreis. 1999. CLIP-170 highlights growing microtubule ends in vivo. Cell. 96:517-527.
80. Drabek, K., M. van Ham, T. Stepanova, K. Draegestein, R. van Horssen, et al. 2006. Role of CLASP2 in microtubule stabilization and the regulation of persistent motility. Curr. Biol. 16:2259-2264.
81. Palazzo, A. F., T. A. Cook, A. S. Alberts, and G. G. Gundersen. 2001. mDia mediates Rho-regulated formation and orientation of stable microtubules. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:723-729.
82. Larsson, N., U. Marklund, H. M. Gradin, G. Brattsand, and M. Gullberg. 1997. Control of microtubule dynamics by oncoprotein 18: dissection of the regulatory role of multisite phosphorylation during mitosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5530-5539.
83. Andersen, S. S. 2000. Spindle assembly and the art of regulating microtubule dynamics by MAPs and Stathmin/Op18. Trends Cell Biol. 10:261-267.
84. Wittmann, T., G. M. Bokoch, and C. M. Waterman-Storer. 2004. Regulation of microtubule destabilizing activity of Op18/stathmin downstream of Rac1. J. Biol. Chem. 279:6196-6203.
85. Palazzo, A. F., C. H. Eng, D. D. Schlaepfer, E. E. Marcantonio, and G. G. Gundersen. 2004. Localized stabilization of microtubules by integrin-and FAK-facilitated Rho signaling. Science. 303:836-839.
86. Witze, E. S., E. S. Litman, G. M. Argast, R. T. Moon, and N. G. Ahn. 2008. Wnt5a control of cell polarity and directional movement by polarized redistribution of adhesion receptors. Science. 320:365-369.
87. Wittmann, T., and C. M. Waterman-Storer. 2001. Cell motility: can Rho GTPases and microtubules point the way? J. Cell Sci. 114:3795-3803.
88. Ueda, M., and S. Ogihara. 1994. Microtubules are required in amoeba chemotaxis for preferential stabilization of appropriate pseudopods. J. Cell Sci. 107:2071-2079.
89. Keller, H. U., A. Naef, and A. Zimmermann. 1984. Effects of colchicine, vinblastine and nocodazole on polarity, motility, chemotaxis and cAMP levels of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 153:173-185.
90. Malikov, V., E. N. Cytrynbaum, A. Kashina, A. Mogilner, and V. Rodionov. 2005. Centering of a radial microtubule array by translocation along microtubules spontaneously nucleated in the cytoplasm. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:1213-1218.
91. Vallee, R. B., and S. A. Stehman. 2005. How dynein helps the cell find its center: a servomechanical model. Trends Cell Biol. 15:288-294.
92. Tang, L., J. Franca-Koh, Y. Xiong, M. Y. Chen, Y. Long, et al. 2008. tsunami, the Dictyostelium homolog of the Fused kinase, is required for polarization and chemotaxis. Genes Dev. 22:2278-2290.
93. Krendel, M., F. T. Zenke, and G. M. Bokoch. 2002. Nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 mediates cross-talk between microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:294-301.
94. Niggli, V., S. Djafarzadeh, and H. Keller. 1999. Stimulus-induced selective association of actin-associated proteins (α-actinin) and protein kinase C isoforms with the cytoskeleton of human neutrophils. Exp. Cell Res. 250:558-568.
95. Xu, J., F. Wang, A. Van Keymeulen, M. Rentel, and H. R. Bourne. 2005. Neutrophil microtubules suppress polarity and enhance directional migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:6884-6889.
96. Mallik, R., and S. P. Gross. 2004. Molecular motors: strategies to get along. Curr. Biol. 14:R971-R982.
97. Gerisch, G., D. Hulser, D. Malchow, and U. Wick. 1975. Cell communication by periodic cyclic-AMP pulses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 272:181-192.
98. Varnum-Finney, B. J., E. Voss, and D. R. Soll. 1987. Frequency and orientation of pseudopod formation of Dictyostelium discoideum amebae chemotaxing in a spatial gradient: further evidence for a temporal mechanism. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 8:18-26.
99. Vasiliev, J. M. 1991. Polarization of pseudopodial activities: cytoskeletal mechanisms. J. Cell Sci. 98:1-4.
100. Onsum, M. D., K. Wong, P. Herzmark, H. R. Bourne, and A. P. Arkin. 2006. Morphology matters in immune cell chemotaxis: membrane asymmetry affects amplification. Phys. Biol. 3:190-199.
101. Chodniewicz, D., and R. L. Klemke. 2004. Guiding cell migration through directed extension and stabilization of pseudopodia. Exp. Cell Res. 301:31-37.
102. Meinhardt, H. 2008. Models of biological pattern formation: from elementary steps to the organization of embryonic axes. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 81:1-63.
103. Friedl, P., and E. B. Brocker. 2000. The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57:41-64.