The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Science

Volumn 319, Issue 5862, 2008, Pages 482-484

  Mettetal, Jerome T ^a   Muzzey, Dale ^a,b   Gómez Uribe, Carlos ^a   Van Oudenaarden, Alexander ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOG1 KINASE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ENZYME; FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE; GENE EXPRESSION; LIGAND; MODEL; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; YEAST;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NONHUMAN; OSMOSIS; OSMOTIC STRESS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CELL NUCLEUS; FEEDBACK, BIOCHEMICAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GLYCEROL; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 38549084632     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1151582     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. J. Tyson, K. Chen, B. Novak, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 908 (2001).
2. B. M. Slepchenko, J. C. Schaff, I. Macara, L. M. Loew, Trends Cell Biol. 13, 570 (2003).
3. H. Kitano, A. Funahashi, Y. Matsuoka, K. Oda, Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 961 (2005).
4. E. Klipp, B. Nordlander, R. Kruger, P. Gennemark, S. Hohmann, Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 975 (2005).
5. A. V. Oppenheim, A. S. Willsky, I. T. Young, Signals and Systems (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983).
6. D. T. Westwick, R. E. Kearney, Identification of Nonlinear Physiological Systems (IEEE Press, Hoboken, NJ, 2003).
7. M. A. Savageau, Biochemical Systems Analysis: A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1976).
8. S. M. Block, J. E. Segall, H. C. Berg, Cell 31, 215 (1982).
9. T. M. Yi, Y. Huang, M. I. Simon, J. Doyle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 4649 (2000).
10. W. Vance, A. Arkin, J. Ross, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 5816 (2002).
11. M. Samoilov, A. Arkin, J. Ross, J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 10205 (2002).
12. B. P. Ingalls, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 1143 (2004).
13. E. D. Sontag, Eur. J. Control 11, 396 (2005).
14. O. Lipan, W. H. Wong, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 7063 (2005).
15. S. Hohmann, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 300 (2002).
16. P. Gennemark, B. Nordlander, S. Hohmann, D. Wedelin, In Silico Biol. 6, 193 (2006).
17. P. Ferrigno, F. Posas, D. Koepp, H. Saito, P. A. Silver, EMBO J. 17, 5606 (1998).
18. V. Reiser, H. Ruis, G. Ammerer, Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1147 (1999).
19. F. Posas et al., J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17249 (2000).
20. Details are available in the supporting materials on Science Online.
21. In principle, both the input and output signals also contain higher-frequency components. Nevertheless, here we focus on the driving frequency alone in order to simplify analysis while obtaining significant information about the signal's strength and timing.
22. nl(y) = y(t) + |y(t)| (fig. S3).
23. K. Luyten et al., EMBO J. 14, 1360 (1995).
24. M. J. Tamas et al., Mol. Microbiol. 31, 1087 (1999).
25. J. Albertyn, S. Hohmann, J. M. Thevelein, B. A. Prior, Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4135 (1994).
26. M. Thorsen et al., Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 4400 (2006).
27. M. Proft, K. Struhl, Cell 118, 351 (2004).
28. M. Krantz et al., Eukaryot. Cell 3, 1381 (2004).
29. We thank J. Falvo, R. Tsien, and E. O'Shea for suggesting and providing Nrd1-RFP as a nuclear marker and E. Sontag, S. Hohmann, K. Maclean, and A. Raj for helpful discussions. Supported by NSF grant PHY-0548484 and NIH grants R01-GM068957 and 5 R90 DK071511-01, NSF Graduate Research Fellowships to J.T.M. and D.M., and an MIT-Merck Graduate Fellowship to C.G.-U.