A bistable mechanism for directional sensing

New Journal of Physics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Beta, C ^a,b   Amselem, G ^b   Bodenschatz, E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DYNAMICS AND SELF ORGANIZATION   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMICS; GRADIENT METHODS; MECHANISMS; SENSORS;

BI-STABLE; BI-STABLE MECHANISM; BISTABLE DYNAMICS; BISTABLE SWITCHING; CHEMOATTRACTANT; DIRECTIONAL SENSING; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; EXTERNAL-; GENERIC MECHANISM; INPUT SIGNALS; KEY FEATURE; MODELING APPROACHES; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; SENSING SYSTEMS; SYMMETRY BREAKING; TWO-COMPONENT;

BEAMS AND GIRDERS;

EID: 50249178222     PISSN: 13672630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/10/8/083015     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Clark R 1996 The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair (New York: Plenum)
2. Condeelis J, Singer R H and Segall J E 2005 The great escape: when cancer cells hijack the genes for chemotaxis and motility Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21 695-718
3. Orourke N A, Dailey M E, Smith S J and McConnell S K 1992 Diverse migratory pathways in the developing cerebral-cortex Science 258 299-302
4. Berg H C 2003 E. coli in Motion (New York: Springer)
5. Van Haastert P J M and Devreotes P N 2004 Chemotaxis : signalling the way forward Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5 626-34
6. Zigmond S H 1977 Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors J. Cell Biol. 75 606-16
7. Fisher P R, Merkl R and Gerisch G 1989 Quantitative-analysis of cell motility and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum by using an image-processing system and a novel chemotaxis chamber providing stationary chemical gradients J. Cell Biol. 108 973-84
8. Song L, Nadkarni S M, Bödeker H U, Beta C, Bae A, Franck C, Rappel W-J, Loomis W F and Bodenschatz E 2006 Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis: threshold for directed motion Eur. J. Cell Biol. 85 981-9
9. Parent C A and Devreotes P N 1999 A cell's sense of direction Science 284 765-70
10. Mananan C L, Iglesias P A, Long Y and Devreotes P N 2004 Chemoattractant signaling in Dictyostelium discoideum Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20 223-53
11. Charest P G and Firtel R A 2006 Feedback signaling controls leading-edge formation during chemotaxis Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16 339-47
12. Levchenko A and Iglesias P A 2002 Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils Biophys. J. 82 50-63
13. 3 response in Dictyostelium cells Biophys. J. 87 3764-74
14. Rappel W J, Thomas P J, Levine H and Loomis W F 2002 Establishing direction during chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells Biophys. J. 83 1361-7
15. Postma M and Van Haastert PJM 2001 A diffusion-translocation model for gradient sensing by chemotactic cells Biophys. J. 81 1314-23
16. Meinhardt H 1999 Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms J. Cell Sci. 112 2867-74
17. Narang A, Subramanian K K and Lauffenburger D A 2001 A mathematical model for chemoattractant gradient sensing based on receptor-regulated membrane phospholipid signaling dynamics Ann. Biomed. Eng. 29 677-91
18. Subramanian K K and Narang A 2004 A mechanistic model for eukaryotic gradient sensing: spontaneous and induced phosphoinositide polarization J. Theor. Biol. 23149-67
19. Meier-Schellersheim M, Xu X H, Angermann B, Kunkel E J, Jin T and Germain R N 2006 Key role of local regulation in chemosensing revealed by a new molecular interaction-based modeling method PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 710-24
20. van Haastert PJM and Postma M 2007 Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection Biophys. J. 93 1787-96
21. Wang K, Rappel W J, Kerr R and Levine H 2007 Quantifying noise levels of intercellular signals Phys. Rev. E 75 061905
22. Kimmel J M, Salter R M and Thomas P J 2006 An information theoretic framework for eukaryotic gradient sensing Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 19 705-12
23. Ueda M and Shibata T 2007 Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells Biophys. J. 93 11-20
24. Gamba A, de Candia A, Di Talia S, Coniglio A, Bussolino F and Serini G 2005 Diffusion-limited phase separation in eukaryotic chemotaxis Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 16927-32
25. Gamba A, Kolokolov I, Lebedev V and Ortenzi G 2007 Patch coalescence as a mechanism for eukaryotic directional sensing Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 158101
26. Janetopoulos C, Ma L, Devreotes P N and Iglesias P A 2004 Chemoattractant-induced phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate accumulation is spatially amplified and adapts, independent of the actin cytoskeleton Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 8951-6
27. Levine H, Kessler D A and Rappel W J 2006 Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 9761-6
28. Andrew N and Insall R H 2007 Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of ptdins 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions Nat. Cell Biol. 9 193-1
29. Killich T, Plath P J, Hass E C, Xiang W, Bultmann H, Rensing L and Vicker M G 1994 Cell-movement and shape are nonrandom and determined by intracellular, oscillatory rotating waves in Dictyostelium amebas Biosystems 33 75-87
30. Cross M C and Hohenberg PC 1993 Pattern formation outside of equilibrium Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 851
31. Mikhailov A S 1994 Foundations of Synergetics I (Berlin: Springer)
32. Xu X H, Meier-Schellersheim M, Jiao X M, Nelson L E and Jin T 2005 Quantitative imaging of single live cells reveals spatiotemporal dynamics of multistep signaling events of chemoattractant gradient sensing in Dictyostelium Mol. Biol. Cell 16 676-88
33. Samadani A, Mettetal J and van Oudenaarden A 2006 Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 11549-54
34. Jeon N L, Baskaran H, Dertinger S K W, Whitesides G M, Van de Water L and Toner M 2002 Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device Nat. Biotechnol. 20 826-30
35. Herzmark P, Campbell K, Wang F, Wong K, El-Samad H, Groisman A and Bourne H R 2007 Bound attractant at the leading versus the trailing edge determines chemotactic prowess Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 13349-54
36. Breslauer D N, Lee P J and Lee L P 2006 Microfluidics-based systems biology Mol. Biosyst. 2 97-112
37. Beta C, Wyatt D, Rappel W-J and Bodenschatz E 2007 Flow photolysis for spatiotemporal stimulation of single cells Anal. Chem. 79 3940-4
38. 3 during chemoattractant signaling in dictyostelium: a quantitative in vivo analysis by inhibition of PI3-kinase Mol. Biol. Cell 17 1503-13
39. Hoeller O and Kay R R 2007 Chemotaxis in the absence of PIP3 gradients Curr. Biol. 17 813-7
40. Takeda K, Sasaki A T, Ha H J, Seung H A and Firtel R A 2007 Role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases in chemotaxis in Dictyostelium. J. Biol. Chem. 282 11874-84