A model for self-regulated distance language learning

Distance Education

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 47-61

  Andrade, Maureen S ^a   Bunker, Ellen L ^b  

^a UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Distance language learning; Learning strategies; Model of self regulated distance learning; Self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651165513     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910902845956     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson, B. (2007). Independent learning. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 109-122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, N.J. (2004). Developing metacognitive awareness. In R.R. Day & J. Bamford (Eds.), Extensive reading activities for teaching language (pp. 175-180). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
3. Anderson, T. (2007). Modes of interaction. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 298-309). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Baggetun, R., & Wasson, B. (2006). Self-regulated learning and open writing. European Journal of Education, 41(3/4), 453-472.
5. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Pearson Education.
6. Bown, J. (2006). Locus of learning and affective strategy use: Two factors affecting success in self-instructed language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 39(4), 640-659.
7. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
8. Dembo, M.H., & Eaton, M.J. (2000). Self-regulation of academic learning in middle-level schools. The Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 473-490.
9. Dembo, M.H., Junge, L.G., & Lynch, R. (2006). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Implications for web-based education. In H.F. O'Neil & R.S. Perez (Eds.), Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 185-202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Ding, A. (2005). Theoretical and practical issues in the promotion of collaborative learner autonomy in a virtual self-access centre. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Distance education and languages: Evolution and change (pp. 40-54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
11. Gardner, R., & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
12. Garrison, R.D. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. In M.G. Moore & W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 161-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 66-82.
14. Harlow, J. (2007). Successfully teaching Biblical language online at the seminary level: Guiding principles of course design and delivery. Teaching Theology and Religion, 10(1), 13-24.
15. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning: Council of Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
16. Holmberg, B., Shelley, M., & White, C. (Eds.). (2005). Distance education and languages: Evolution and change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
17. Hurd, S. (1998a). Autonomy at any price? Issues and concerns from a British HE perspective. Foreign Language Annals, 31(2), 219-230.
18. Hurd, S. (1998b). 'Too carefully led or too carelessly left alone?' Language Learning Journal, 17, 70-74.
19. Hurd, S. (2000). Helping learners to help themselves: The role of metacognitive skills and strategies in independent language learning. In M. Fay & D. Ferney (Eds.), Current trends in modern language provision for non-specialist linguists (pp. 36-52). London: The National Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research (CILT) in association with Anglia Polytechnic University (APU).
20. Hurd, S. (2001). Managing and supporting language learners in open and distance learning environments. In M. Mozzon-McPherson & R. Vismans (Eds.), Beyond language teaching towards language advising (pp. 135-149). London: CILT.
21. Hurd, S. (2005). Autonomy and the distance language learner. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Distance education and languages: Evolution and change (pp. 1-19). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
22. Hurd, S. (2006). Towards a better understanding of the dynamic role of the distance language learning: Learner perceptions of personality, motivation, roles, and approaches. Distance Education, 27(3), 303-329.
23. Hurd, S., Beaven, T., & Ortega, A. (2001). Developing autonomy in a distance language learning context: Issues and dilemmas for course writers. System, 29(3), 341-355.
24. Hymes, D. (1971). Competence and performance in linguistic theory. In R. Huxley & E. Ingram (Eds.), Language acquisition: Models and methods. London: Academic Press.
25. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
26. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
27. Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues, and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
28. Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181.
29. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Moore, M.G. (1972). Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning. Convergence, 5(2), 76-88. Retrieved August 4, 2008, from http://www.ajde.com/ Documents/learner-autonomy.pdf
31. Moore, M.G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 89-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
33. Muller-Verweyen, M. (1999). Reflection as a means of acquiring autonomy. In S. Cotterall & D. Crabbe (Eds.), Learner autonomy in language learning. Defining the field and effecting change (pp. 79-88). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
34. Murphy, L. (2005). Critical reflection and autonomy: A study of distance learners of French, German and Spanish. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Distance education and languages: Evolution and change (pp. 20-39). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
35. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
36. Oxford, R. (1994). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
37. Oxford, R.L. (2008). Hero with a thousand faces: Learning autonomy, learning strategies and learning tactics in independent language learning. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 41-63). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
38. Poon, A.Y.K. (2003). A challenge for the developer: Issues of interactivity and linguistic-cognitive appropriateness in English language learning. Open Learning, 18(2), 135-153.
39. Ros i Solé, C., & Hopkins, J. (2007). Contrasting two approaches to distance language learning. Distance Education, 28(5), 351-370.
40. Sanders, R.E. (2005). Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online management, cost reduction, and effects on student learning. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 523-532.
41. Silberstein, S., Dobson, B.K., & Clarke, M.A. (2002). Reader's choice (4th ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
42. Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2007). Designing online tutor training for language courses: A case study. Open Learning, 22(1), 75-85.
43. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), For H.G. Widdowson: Principles and practice in the study of language (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Thang, S.M. (2005). Investigating Malaysian distance learners' perceptions of their English proficiency courses. Open Learning, 20(3), 243-256.
45. Ushioda, E. (2008). Using I-statement analysis to explore autonomy and change (CUTE 2 Research Report). Retrieved December 22, 2008, from http://echinauk.org/cases2/cute2/ research.htm
46. van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merrienboër, J.J.G. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 532-548.
47. Vanijdee, A. (2003). Thai distance English learners and learner autonomy. Open Learning, 18(1), 75-84.
48. White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
49. White, C. (2005). Towards a learner-based theory of distance language learning: The concept of the learner-context interface. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Distance education and languages: Evolution and change (pp. 55-71). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
50. Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73-86.
52. Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 29-36.