Theoretical and Practical Issues in the Promotion of Collaborative Learner Autonomy in a Virtual Self-access Centre

Distance Education and Languages: Evolution and Change

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 40-54

  Ding, Alex ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651172013     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Aston, G. (1993) The learner’s contribution to the self-access centre. ELT Journal 47 (3), 219-27.
2. Benson, P. (1994) Self-access systems as information systems: questions of ideology and control. In D. Gardner and L. Miller (eds) Directions in Self-access Language Learning (pp. 3-12). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
3. Benson, P. (1996) Concepts of autonomy in language learning. In R. Pemberton, E. S. L. Li and H. D. Pierson (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 27-34). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
4. Benson, P. (1997) The semiotics of self-access language learning in the digital age. In V. Darleguy, A. Ding and M. Svensson (eds) Educational Technology in Language Learning: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Applications (pp. 70-78). Lyons: National Institute of Applied Sciences.
5. Benson, P. and Voller, P. (1997) Introduction: Autonomy and independence in language learning. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 1-12). London: Longman.
6. Broady, E. and Kenning, M-M. (eds) (1996) Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching. London: Association for French Language Studies/CILT.
7. Brown, A. (1997) Designing for learning: What are the essential features of an effective online course? Australian Journal of Educational Technology 13 (2), 115-26.
8. Carpenter, C. (1996) Peer teaching: a new approach to advanced level language teaching. In E. Broady and M-M. Kenning (eds) Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching (pp. 23-38). London: Association for French Language Studies/CILT.
9. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. and Webb, C. (2000) Towards a communicative model of collaborative web-mediated learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 16 (1), 73-85.
10. Chen, H-J. (1999) Creating a virtual language lab: An EFL experience at National Taiwan Ocean University. ReCALL 11 (2), 20-30.
11. Chun, D.M. (1994) Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System 22 (1), 17-31.
12. Coverdale-Jones, T. (1998) Does computer-mediated conferencing really have a reduced social dimension? ReCALL 10 (1), 46-52.
13. Crabbe, D. (1999) Defining the field: introduction. In S. Cotterall, and D. Crabbe (eds) Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining the Field and Effecting Change (pp. 3-10). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
14. Crossley, N. (1996) Intersubjectivity: The Fabric of Social Becoming. London: Sage.
15. Dam, L. (1995) Learner Autonomy 3: From Theory to Classroom Practice. Dublin: Authentik.
16. Dudeney, G. (2000) The Internet and the Language Classroom: A Practical Guide for Teachers. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
17. Esch, E. (1996) Promoting learner autonomy: Criteria for the selection of appropriate methods. In R. Pemberton, E.S.L. Li and H.D. Pierson (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 35-48). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
18. Esch, E. (1997) Learner training for autonomous language learning. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 164-76). London: Longman.
19. Felix, U. (1999) Exploring the web for language teaching: Selected approaches. ReCALL 11 (1), 30-7.
20. Fox, J. (1998) Breaking down the distance barriers: Perceptions and practice in technology-mediated distance language acquisition. ReCALL 10 (1), 15-26.
21. Gordon, J. (1996) Tracks for learning: Metacognition and learning technologies. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 12 (1), 46-55.
22. Herrington, J. and Oliver, R. (1997) Multimedia, magic and the way students respond to a situated learning environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 13 (2), 127-43.
23. Ho, J. and Crookall, D. (1995) Breaking with Chinese cultural traditions: Learner autonomy in English language teaching. System 23 (2), 235-44.
24. Holec, H. (1981) Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
25. Husserl, E. (1991) Cartesian Meditations. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publications.
26. Jones, J.F (1995) Self-access and culture: Retreating from autonomy. ELT Journal 49 (3), 228-34.
27. Kojéve, A. (1967) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. New York: Cornell University Press.
28. Little, D. (1999) Learner autonomy is more than a western cultural construct. In S. Cotterall and D. Crabbe (eds) Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining the Field and Effecting Change (pp. 11-18). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
29. Little. D. (2000) Learner autonomy and human interdependence: Some theoretical and practical consequences of a social-interactive view of cognition, learning and language. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb. (eds) Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions (pp. 15-23). London: Longman.
30. Littlewood, W.T. (1997) Self-access:Whydo want it and what can it do? In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 79-92). London: Longman.
31. Martyn, E. (1994) Self-access logs: Promoting self-directed learning. In D. Gardner, and L. Miller (eds) Directions in Self-Access Language Learning (pp. 65-78). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
32. Mead, G.H. (1967) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
33. Merleau-Ponty. M. (1962) The Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
34. Motteram, G. (1997) Learner autonomy and the web. In V. Darleguy, A. Ding and M. Svensson (eds) Educational Technology in Language Learning: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Applications (pp. 17-24). Lyon: INSA National Institute of Applied Sciences.
35. Nunan, D. (1997) Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 192-203). London: Longman.
36. Oakey, D. (2000) An EAP module via the Merlin internet learning environment. In P. Howarth and R. Herington (eds) EAP Learning Technologies (pp. 115-28). Leeds: Leeds University Press.
37. Or, W.W.F. (1994) Helping learners plan and prepare for self-access learning. In D. Gardner and L. Miller (eds) Directions in Self-Access Language Learning (pp. 45-58). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
38. Orsini-Jones, M. (1999) Implementing institutional change for languages: Online collaborative learning environments at Coventry University. ReCALL 11 (2), 61-73.
39. Ortega, L. (1997) Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning and Technology 1 (1), 82-93.
40. Pellettieri, J. (2000) Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer and R. Kern (eds) Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Pemberton, R. (1996) Introduction. In R. Pemberton, E.S.L. Li and H.D. Pierson (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 1-8). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
42. Ragoonaden, K. and Bordeleau, P. (2000) Collaborative learning via the internet. Educational Technology and Society 3 (3), Online document: http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_3_2000/d11.html.
43. Schultz, J. M. (2000) Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum. In M. Warschauer and R. Kern (eds) Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 121-50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Schwienhorst, K. (1998) The ‘third place’ - virtual reality applications for second language learning. ReCALL 10 (1), 118-26.
45. Sheerin, S. (1997) An exploration of the relationship between self-access and independent learning. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 54-65). London: Longman.
46. Sinclair, B. (1996) Materials design for the promotion of learner autonomy: How explicit is explicit? In R. Pemberton, E. S. L. Li and H. D. Pierson (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 149-166). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
47. Sinclair, B. (2000) Learner autonomy: The next phase? In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (eds) Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions (pp. 4-14). London: Longman.
48. Söntgens, K. (1999) Language learning via e-mail - autonomy through collaboration. In Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference, C. Hoadley and J. Roschelle (eds) Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Thomson, C.K. (1996) Self-assessment in self-directed learning: Issues of learner diversity. In R. Pemberton, E.S.L. Li and H.D. Pierson (eds) Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 77-91). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
50. Tudor, I. (1996) Learner-centredness as Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Victori, M. and Lockhart, W. (1995) Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System 23 (2), 223-34.
52. Warschauer, M. (1997) Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal 81, 470-81.
53. Warschauer, M. and Kern, R. (eds) (2000) Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Windeatt, S., Hardisty, D. and Eastment, D. (2000) The Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Wolff, D. (1997) The use of e-mail in foreign language teaching. In V. Darleguy, A. Ding and M. Svensson (eds) Educational Technology in Language Learning: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Applications (pp. 136-45). Lyon: National Institute of Applied Sciences.