Interdependence between disc space height, range of motion and clinical outcome in total lumbar disc replacement

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 904-916

  Siepe, Christoph J ^a   Hitzl, Wolfgang ^b   Meschede, Peter ^a   Sharma, Ajay K ^c   Khattab, Mohamed F ^d   Mayer, Michael H ^a  

^a Spine Center   (Germany)

^b PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^c Penang Adventist Hospital   (Malaysia)

^d Ain Shams University   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Clinical results prospective studies; Disc height; Lumbar spine; Segmental motion; Spine arthroplasty; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISC SPACE HEIGHT; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LUMBAR DISK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX SCORE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETER; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; TOTAL LUMBAR DISC REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

DISKECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67650766307     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819966b0     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adams MA, Roughley PJ. What isintervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 2006;31:2151-61.
2. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, et al. The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 2000;25:3036-44.
3. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Schmidt H, et al. Analysis of the influence of disc degenerationonthe mechanical behaviour ofa lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. J Biomech 2006;39:2484-90.
4. Rousseau MA, Bradford DS, Hadi TM, et al. The instant axis of rotation influences facet forces at L5/S1 during flexion/extension and lateral bending. Eur Spine J 2006;15:299-307.
5. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF. Instabilityof the lumbar spine.Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982:110-23.
6. Masuda K, Aota Y, Muehleman C, et al. A novel rabbit model of mild, reproducible disc degeneration by an anulus needle puncture: correlation between the degree of disc injury and radiological and histological appearances of disc degeneration. Spine 2005;30:5-14.
7. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Kramer M, et al. Height of lumbar discs measured from radiographs compared with degeneration and height classified from MR images. Eur Radiol 2001;11:263-9.
8. Berlemann U, Gries NC, Moore RJ. The relationship between height, shape, and histological changes in early degeneration of the lower lumbar discs. Eur Spine J 1998;7:212-7.
9. Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Moore RJ, et al. Intervertebral disc degeneration reduces vertebral motion responses. Spine 2007;32:E544-50.
10. Dabbs VM, Dabbs LG. Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain. Spine 1990;15:1366-9.
11. Lidar Z, Beaumont A, Lifshutz J, et al. Clinical and radiological relationship between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral lumbar fusion. Surg Neurol 2005;64:303-8; discussion 8.
12. Schulte TL, Leistra F, Bullmann V, et al. Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion. Eur Spine J 2007;16:2152-8.
13. Huang RC, Lim MR, Girardi FP, et al. The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients. Spine 2004; 29:2538-41.
14. Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Wiechert K, et al. Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications. Spine 2006;31:1923-32.
15. McAfee PC. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2004;4:177S-81S.
16. Wong DA, Annesser B, Birney T, et al. Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis. Spine J 2007;7:5-11.
17. Chin KR. Epidemiology of indications and contraindications to total disc replacement in an academic practice. Spine J 2007;7:392-8.
18. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1565-75; discussion E387-91.
19. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 2007;32: 1155-62; discussion 63.
20. Mayer HM, Wiechert K. Microsurgical anterior approaches to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement. Neurosurgery 2002; 51:S159-65.
21. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A, et al. Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S124-30.
22. Bertagnoli R, Marnay T, Mayer HM. The ProDisc Book ed. Tuttlingen, Germany: Spine Solutions GmbH, 2003.
23. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3.
24. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, et al. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 2001;26:E235-42.
25. Cakir B, Richter M, Puhl W, et al. Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method. Eur Spine J 2006;15: 165-73.
26. Lim MR, Girardi FP, Zhang K, et al. Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:252-6.
27. Lim MR, Loder RT, Huang RC, et al. Measurement error of lumbar total disc replacement range of motion. Spine 2006;31:E291-7.
28. Luoma K, Vehmas T, Riihimaki H, et al. Disc height and signal intensity of the nucleus pulposus on magnetic resonance imaging as indicators of lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 2001;26:680-6.
29. Andersson GB, Schultz A, Nathan A, et al. Roentgenographic measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc height. Spine 1981;6:154-8.
30. Hill T, Lewicki P. Statistiks. Methods and Applicationsed. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft Inc; 2007.
31. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS. Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: a prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:411-5.
32. Pope MH, Hanley EN, Matteri RE, et al. Measurement of intervertebral disc space height. Spine 1977;2:282-6.
33. Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Spine 2008;33:123-31.
34. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996;21:995-1000.
35. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LE, et al. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 2003;28:S167-75.
36. Hochschuler SH, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, et al. Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S106-10.
37. LeHuec JC, Basso Y,Aunoble S,etal. Influence offacet and posterior muscle degeneration on clinical results of lumbar total disc replacement: two-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:219-23.
38. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Ali el HS, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:353-9.
39. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al. SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16:424-33.
40. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999;8:210-7.
41. Cakir B, Richter M, Kafer W, et al. The impact of total lumbar disc replacement on segmental and total lumbar lordosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005;20:357-64.
42. Liu J, Ebraheim NA, Haman SP, et al. Effect of the increase in the height of lumbar disc space on facet joint articulation area in sagittal plane. Spine 2006;31:E198-202.
43. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G. Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 2005; 30:738-43.
44. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, et al. Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 2005;30:1407-11.
45. Ross R, Mirza AH, Norris HE, et al. Survival and clinical outcome of SB Charite III disc replacement for back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89: 785-9.
46. Kim DH, Ryu KS, Kim MK, et al. Factors influencing segmental range of motion after lumbar total disc replacement using the ProDisc II prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:131-8.
47. Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, et al. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 2007; 16:411-21.
48. Leivseth G, Braaten S, Frobin W, et al. Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study.Spine2006; 31:1726-33.
49. Shim CS, Lee SH, Shin HD, et al. CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up. Spine 2007;32:1012-8.
50. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005; 30:1576-83; discussion E388-90.
51. Rousseau MA, Bradford DS, Bertagnoli R, et al. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces. Spine J 2006;6: 258-66.
52. Quack C, Schenk P, LaeubliT,et al. Do MRIfindings correlate with mobility tests? An explorative analysis of the test validity with regard to structure. Eur Spine J 2007;16:803-12.
53. Thomas JS, France CR. Pain-Related fear is associated with avoidance of spinal motion during recovery from low back pain. Spine 2007;32:E460-6.
54. Siepe CJ, Wiechert K, Khattab MF, et al. Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1001-13.
55. Schuler TC, Burkus JK, Gornet MF, et al. The correlation between preoper-ative disc space height and clinical outcomes after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:396-401.
56. Moore RJ, Crotti TN, Osti OL, et al. Osteoarthrosis of the facet joints resulting from anular rim lesions in sheep lumbar discs. Spine 1999;24: 519-25.
57. Tischer T, Aktas T, Milz S, et al. Detailed pathological changes of human lumbar facet joints L1-L5 in elderly individuals. Eur Spine J 2005.
58. Freeman BJ, Davenport J. Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006;15:439-47.
59. Zeh A, Planert M, Siegert G, et al. Release of cobalt and chromium ions into the serum following implantation of the metal-on-metal Maverick-type artificial lumbar disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek). Spine 2007;32: 348-52.
60. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S131-6.
61. Yaszay B, Bendo JA, Goldstein JA, et al. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement. Spine 2008;33:508-12; discussion 13.
62. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2003;28:S110-7.
63. Denoziere G, Ku DN. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech 2006;39:766-75.
64. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, et al. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine 2006;31:S152-60.
65. Sariali el H, Lemaire JP, Pascal-Mousselard H, et al. In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10 to 14 years follow-up evaluation. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1501-10.
66. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, et al. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 2001;26:E122-9.
67. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997: 64-76.
68. Rundell SA, Auerbach JD, Balderston RA, et al. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains. Spine 2008;33:2510-17.
69. Siepe CJ, Korge A, Grochulla F, et al. Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations. Eur Spine J 2008;17:44 -56.
70. David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthoplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITÉ artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 2007;32:661-6.
71. Huang RC, Tropiano P, Marnay T, et al. Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 2006;6:242-7.
72. Le Huec J, Basso Y, Mathews H, et al. The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 2005;14:480-6.