Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: An in vitro human cadaveric model

Spine

Volumn 28, Issue 20 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Cunningham, Bryan W ^a   Gordon, Jeffrey D ^b   Dmitriev, Anton E ^a   Hu, Nianbin ^a   McAfee, Paul C ^a  

^a UNION MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial disc replacement; Biomechanics; Motion preservation

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREW; CADAVER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; LUMBOSACRAL SPINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE STABILIZATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 0142026310     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000092209.27573.90     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ahrens J, et al. Normal Joint Mobility Is Maintained With an Artificial Disc Prosthesis. Presented at: Proceedings of the International Society for Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS); 1998; Brussels, Belgium.
2. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL, et al. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial. Spine 1998;23:1267-79.
3. McAfee PC. Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81A:859-80.
4. Ray CD. Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 1997;22:667-80.
5. Hoag J. Kinematic analysis and classification of vertebral motion. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1960;59:899-908.
6. Panjabi MM. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. a conceptual framework. Spine 1988;13:1129-33.
7. Cinotti G, et al. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of two years. Spine 1996;21:995-1000.
8. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K, et al. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 1994;19:1842-9.
9. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop 1997;337:64-76.
10. Ross ESR. A prospective cohort study of the Charite disc replacement. Presented at: NASS Proceedings, 12th Annual Meeting, October 22-25, 1997; New York, NY.
11. Bao QB, McCullen GM, Higham PA, et al. The Artificial Disc: Theory, Design and Materials. Biomaterials 1996;17:1157-67.
12. Lee CK, Langrana NA, Parsons JR, et al. Development of a prosthetic intervertebral disc. Spine 1991;16:S253-S255.
13. Ray CD, Schonmayr R, Kliniken HS. A prosthetic lumbar nucleus "artificial disc". Presented at: NASS Proceedings, 12th Annual Meeting; October 22-25, 1997; New York, NY.
14. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999;8:210-17.
15. Bloebaum RD, Rhodes DM, Rubman MH, et al. Bilateral tibial components of cementless designs and materials. Microradiographic, backscattered imaging, and histologic analysis. Clin Orthop 1991;268:179-87.
16. Buechel FF Sr, Buechel FF Jr, Pappas MJ, et al. Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop 2001;388:41-50.
17. Gertzbein SD, Chan KH, Tile M, et al. Moire patterns: an accurate technique for determination of the locus of the centres of rotation. J Biomech 1985;18:501-9.
18. Ogston NG, King GJ, Gertzbein SD, et al. Centrode patterns in the lumbar spine: baseline studies in normal subjects. Spine 1986;11:591-5.
19. Pearcy MJ, Bogduk N. Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints. Spine 1988;13:1033-41.
20. Panjabi MM, Goel VK, Walter SD, et al. Errors in the center and angle of rotation of a joint: an experimental study. J Biomech Eng 1982;104:232-7.
21. Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A. Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Harrington rod fusion. Spine 1983;8:576-83.
22. Etebar S, Cahill DW. Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 1999;90:163-9.
23. Rahm, MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:392-400.
24. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 1996;21:970-81.