Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 508-512

  Yaszay, Burt ^a   Bendo, John A ^a   Goldstein, Jeffrey A ^a   Quirno, Martin ^a   Spivak, Jeffrey M ^a   Errico, Thomas J ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Disc height; Lumbar disc replacement; Range of motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HEIGHT; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR DISK; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; STUDENT T TEST; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; X RAY FILM; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; FOLLOW UP; IMPLANTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISKECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MOVEMENT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 41049103446     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318165b998     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001;26:2521-32; discussion 32-4.
2. Moore KR, Pinto MR, Butler LM. Degenerative disc disease treated with combined anterior and posterior arthrodesis and posterior instrumentation. Spine 2002;27:1680-6.
3. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 1988;13:375-7.
4. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, et al. Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA 1992;268:907-11.
5. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 2001;10:314-9.
6. Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, et al. Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine 1987;12:97-104.
7. Errico TJ. Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;106-17.
8. Zhao K, Yang C, Zhao C, et al. Assessment of non-invasive intervertebral motion measurements in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 2005;38:1943-6.
9. Leivseth G, Braaten S, Frobin W, et al. Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study. Spine 2006;31:1726-33.
10. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, et al. The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 2000;25:3036-44.
11. Tanaka N, An HS, Lim TH, et al. The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine J 2001;1:47-56.
12. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF. Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;110-23.
13. Liu J, Ebraheim NA, Haman SP, et al. Effect of the increase in the height of lumbar disc space on facet joint articulation area in sagittal plane. Spine 2006;31:E198-E202.
14. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS. Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: a prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:411-15.
15. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS, et al. The effect of lumbar total disc replacement on the spinopelvic alignment and range of motion of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:307-11.
16. Delamarter RB, Bae HW, Pradhan BB. Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:301-13.
17. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, et al. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:352-61.
18. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, et al. Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:435-40.
19. Lim MR, Girardi FP, Zhang K, et al. Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:252-6.
20. Lim MR, Loder RT, Huang RC, et al. Measurement error of lumbar total disc replacement range of motion. Spine 2006;31:E291-E297.
21. Cakir B, Richter M, Puhl W, et al. Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method. Eur Spine J 2006;15:165-73.
22. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part II: Evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1576-83; discussion E388-E390.
23. Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, et al. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 2007;16:411-21.
24. Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW, Eng M, et al. Prevalence of heterotopic ossification following total disc replacement. A prospective, randomized study of two hundred and seventy-six patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:82-8.
25. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Kershaw T, et al. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 2006;31:992-7.
26. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Nanieva R, et al. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:85-90.
27. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, et al. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 2005;30:2192-9.
28. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part I: Evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1565-75; discussion E387-E91.
29. Freeman BJ, Davenport J. Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006;15:439-47.
30. Huang RC, Tropiano P, Marnay T, et al. Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 2006;6:242-7.