Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité™ artificial disc: A 10-year minimum follow-up

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 353-359

  Lemaire, Jean Philippe ^a,b   Carrier, Hélène ^a   Ali, El Hadi Sari ^a   Skalli, Waffa ^a   Lavaste, François ^a  

^a Point de la Nation ^*  (France)

^b Point Medical   (France)

Author keywords

Degenerative disc disease; Lumbar spine; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; BONE MALFORMATION; DEVICE; EMPLOYABILITY; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; JOINT DEGENERATION; LEG ISCHEMIA; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR DISK; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROPERITONEUM; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SPINE MOBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ARTHROPLASTY; BACKACHE; BIOMECHANICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE DISEASE;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BACK PAIN; BIOMECHANICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 29244434186     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000172361.07479.6b     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine. 2002;27:2396-2408.
2. Pavlov PW, Spruit M, Havinga M, et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with threaded fusion cages and autologous bone grafts. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:224-229.
3. Pfeiffer M, Griss P, Haake M, et al. Standardized evaluation of long-term results after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 1996;5:299-307.
4. Scaduto AA, Gamradt SC, Yu WD, et al. Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:502-507.
5. Zdeblick TA, David SM. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: Laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2000;25:2682-2687.
6. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: Two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine. 2000;25:1437-1446.
7. Chen L, Tang T, Yang H. Complications associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using Bagby and Kuslich method for treatment of spondylolisthesis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003;116:99-103.
8. Folman Y, Lee SH, Silvera JR, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a minimally invasive B-twin expandable spinal spacer: A multicenter study. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:455-460.
9. Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2002;27:1536-1542.
10. McLaughlin MR, Haid RW Jr, Rodts GE Jr, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Indications, techniques, and results. Clin Neurosurg. 2000;47:514-527.
11. Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, et al. Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine. 2000;25:1837-1842.
12. Zhao J, Wang X, Hou T, et al. One versus two BAK fusion cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion to L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: A randomized, controlled prospective study in 25 patients with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine. 2002;27:2753-2757.
13. Zhao J, Hou T, Wang X, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with transpedicular screw/rod fixation. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:173-177.
14. Axelsson P, Johnsson R, Stromqvist B, et al. Posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcome of 71 consecutive operations after 4 (2-7) years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:309-314.
15. Bernhardt M, Swartz DE, Clothiaux PL, et al. Posterolateral lumbar and lumbosacral fusion with and without pedicle screw internal fixation. Clin Orthop. 1992;284:109-115.
16. France JC, Yaszemski MJ, Lauerman WC, et al. A randomized prospective study of posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcomes with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine. 1999;24:553-560.
17. Greenough CG, Peterson MD, Hadlow S, et al. Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Results and comparison with anterior interbody fusion. Spine. 1998;23:479-486.
18. Rompe JD, Eysel P, Hopf C. Clinical efficacy of pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion in the symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 1995;4:231-237.
19. Thalgott JS, Sasso RC, Cotler HB, et al. Adult spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral lumbar fusion and pedicular instrumentation with AO DC plates. J Spinal Disord. 1997;10:204-208.
20. Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, et al. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine. 1997; 22:2813-2822.
21. Gertzbein SD, Hollopeter MR, Hall S. Pseudarthrosis of the lumbar spine. Outcome after circumferential fusion. Spine. 1998;23:2352-2357.
22. Gertzbein SD, Hollopeter M, Hall SD. Analysis of circumferential lumbar fusion outcome in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:472-478.
23. Grob D, Scheier HJ, Dvorak J, et al. Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;111:20-25.
24. Kozak JA, O'Brien JP. Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low-back pain patient. Spine. 1990;15:322-328.
25. Liljenqvist U, O'Brien JP, Renton P. Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior lumbar fusion with femoral cortical allograft. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:125-131.
26. Wang JM, Kim DJ, Yun YH. Posterior pedicular screw instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion in adult lumbar spondylolysis or grade I spondylolisthesis with segmental instability. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9:83-88.
27. Whitecloud TS 3rd, Castro FP Jr, Brinker MR, et al. Degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine treated with intervertebral titanium cages and posterior instrumentation for circumferential fusion. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:479-486.
28. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1497-1503.
29. Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:338-345.
30. Throckmorton TW, Hilibrand AS, Mencio GA, et al. The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine. 2003;28:2546-2550.
31. Guigui P, Lambert P, Lassale B, et al. [Long-term outcome at adjacent levels of lumbar arthrodesis] Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997;83:685-696.
32. David T. Lumbar disc prosthesis: Five years follow-up study on 147 patientes with 163 SB CHARITE prosthesis. Presented at the fourth annual meeting of Spine Society of Europe, Nantes, France, 2002.
33. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, et al. Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the ProDisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord. 2003;16:435-440.
34. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop. 1997;337:64-76.
35. Marnay T. Lumbar disc replacement 1-11 years results with ProDisc. Presented at the fourth annual meeting of Spine Society of Europe, Nantes, France, 2002.
36. McKenzie A. Fernstrom intervertebral disc arthroplasty: A long term evaluation. Orthopaedics [Intl]. 1995;3:313-324.
37. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: An in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2003;28:S110-S117.
38. Cunningham BW, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, et al. General principles of total disc replacement arthroplasty: Seventeen cases in a nonhuman primate model. Spine. 2003;28:S118-S124.
39. Hochschuler SH, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, et al. Artificial disc: Preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl 2):S106-S110.
40. Lassale B, Deburge A, Benoist M. [Long-term results of the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis] Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1985;52:27-33.
41. Sari-Ali EH. In vivo study of the kinematics in axial torsion of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement using SB Charite III. [thesis], Paris, 2003.
42. Hayes MA, Howard TC, Gruel CR, et al. Roentgenographic evaluation of lumbar spine flexion-extension in asymptomatic individuals. Spine. 1989;14:327-331.
43. Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB. Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine. 1984;9:582-587.
44. Plamondon A, Gagnon M, Maurais G. Application of a stereoradiographic method for the study of intervertebral motion. Spine. 1988;13:1027-1032.
45. Link HD. History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charite artificial disc. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl 2):S98-S105.