Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement

Spine Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 242-247

  Huang, Russel C ^a   Tropiano, Patrick ^b   Marnay, Thierry ^c   Girardi, Federico P ^a   Lim, Moe R ^a   Cammisa Jr , Frank P ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^c CLINIQUE DU PARC   (France)

Author keywords

Adjacent level degeneration; Disc replacement; Junctional degeneration; Lumbar; Motion; Outcomes; Radiographic; Spine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; BODY HEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; JOINT DEGENERATION; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT INSTABILITY; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR DISK; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OSTEOPHYTE; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANGE OF MOTION; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK REDUCTION; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT DISEASES; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES;

EID: 33646057986     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Tropiano P., Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., et al. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 (2003) 362-368
2. Bertagnoli R., and Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl. 2 (2002) S131-S136
3. Cinotti G., David T., and Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21 (1996) 995-1000
4. Zeegers W.S., Bohnen L.M., Laaper M., et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8 (1999) 210-217
5. Lemaire J.P., Skalli W., Lavaste F., et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop 337 (1997) 64-76
6. Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Cammisa Jr. F.P., et al. Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 (2003) 435-440
7. Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Lim M.R., et al. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 36 (2005) 263-269
8. Harrison D.E., Harrison D.D., Cailliet R., et al. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 26 (2001) E235-E242
9. Ishihara H., Osada R., Kanamori M., et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 14 (2001) 91-99
10. Dupont W.D., and Plummer Jr. W.D. Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 11 (1990) 116-128
11. Kanayama M., Hashimoto T., Shigenobu K., et al. Adjacent-segment morbidity after Graf ligamentoplasty compared with posterolateral lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg 95 (2001) 5-10
12. Penta M., Sandhu A., and Fraser R.D. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 20 (1995) 743-747
13. Rahm M.D., and Hall B.B. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 9 (1996) 392-400
14. Leong J.C., Chun S.Y., Grange W.J., et al. Long-term results of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Spine 8 (1983) 793-799
15. Kumar M.N., Jacquot F., and Hall H. Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 10 (2001) 309-313
16. Miyakoshi N., Abe E., Shimada Y., et al. Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine 25 (2000) 1837-1842
17. Boden S.D., Davis D.O., Dina T.S., et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 (1990) 403-408
18. Boden S.D., McCowin P.R., Davis D.O., et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 (1990) 1178-1184
19. Chou W.Y., Hsu C.J., Chang W.N., et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122 (2002) 39-43
20. Whitecloud III T.S., Davis J.M., and Olive P.M. Operative treatment of the degenerated segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 19 (1994) 531-536
21. Schlegel J.D., Smith J.A., and Schleusener R.L. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 21 (1996) 970-981
22. Lee C.K. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13 (1988) 375-377
23. Hilibrand A.S., Carlson G.D., Palumbo M.A., et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 (1999) 519-528
24. Glassman S.D., Pugh K., Johnson J.R., et al. Surgical management of adjacent level degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Orthopedics 25 (2002) 1051-1055
25. Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Cammisa Jr. F.P., et al. The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 (2003) 412-417
26. Dooris A.P., Goel V.K., Grosland N.M., et al. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 26 (2001) E122-E129
27. Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Cammisa Jr. F.P., et al. Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30 (2005) 1407-1411