Intervertebral disc degeneration reduces vertebral motion responses

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 19, 2007, Pages

  Colloca, Christopher J ^a,b,g   Keller, Tony S ^c   Moore, Robert J ^d   Gunzburg, Robert ^e   Harrison, Deed E ^f  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b State of the Art Chiropractic Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCE   (Australia)

^e Eeuwfeestkliniek   (Belgium)

^f Chiropractic Biophysics Non profit Inc   (United States)

^g NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Degeneration; Intervertebral disc; Manipulation; Mobilization

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; KINEMATICS; LUMBAR DISK; LUMBAR SPINE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEEP; SPINE MOBILITY; SPINE SURGERY;

ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MANIPULATION, SPINAL; MOTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SHEEP; SPINAL DISEASES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34548462908     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145ac39     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lisi AJ, Holmes EJ, Ammendolia C. High-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation for symptomatic lumbar disk disease: a systematic review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28:429-42.
2. Adams MA. Biomechanics of back pain. Acupunct Med 2004;22:178-88.
3. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Cleary J. Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 2000;9:202-7.
4. Keller TS, Colloca CJ, Beliveau JG. Force-deformation response of the lumbar spine: a sagittal plane model of posteroanterior manipulation and mobilization. Clin Biomech 2002;17:185-96.
5. Gal J, Herzog W, Kawchuk G, et al. Movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed human cadavers. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1997;20:30-40.
6. Maigne JY, Guillon F. Highlighting of intervertebral movements and variations of intradiskal pressure during lumbar spine manipulation: a feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23:531-5.
7. Nathan M, Keller TS. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1994;17:431-41.
8. Keller TS, Colloca CJ, Gunzburg R. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation: I. Vertebral motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:567-78.
9. Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser RD. 1990 Volvo Award in experimental studies. Anulus tears and intervertebral disc degeneration: an experimental study using an animal model. Spine 1990;15:762-7.
10. Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Gunzburg R. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation: II. Neurophysiological response. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:579-91.
11. Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Gunzburg R. Biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to spinal manipulation in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004;27:1-15.
12. Keller TS, Colloca CJ. Dynamic dorsoventral stiffness assessment of the ovine lumbar spine. J Biomech 2007;40:191-7.
13. Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Harrison DE, et al. Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses. Clin Biomech 2006;21:254-62.
14. Berlemann U, Gries NC, Moore RJ. The relationship between height, shape and histological changes in early degeneration of the lower lumbar discs. Eur Spine J 1998;7:212-7.
15. Gries NC, Berlemann U, Moore RJ, et al. Early histologic changes in lower lumbar discs and facet joints and their correlation. Eur Spine J 2000;9:23-9.
16. Costi JJ, Hearn TC, Fazzalari NL. The effect of hydration on the stiffness of intervertebral discs in an ovine model. Clin Biomech 2002;17:446-55.
17. Reid JE, Meakin JR, Robins SP, et al. Sheep lumbar intervertebral discs as models for human discs. Clin Biomech 2002;17:312-4.
18. Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Black P, et al. Comparison of mechanical force of manually assisted chiropractic adjusting instruments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28:414-22.
19. Herzog W, Conway PJ, Kawchuk GN, et al. Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 1993;18:1206-12.
20. Herzog W, Kats M, Symons B. The effective forces transmitted by highspeed, low-amplitude thoracic manipulation. Spine 2001;26:2105-10.
21. Gemmell HA, Jacobson BH. The immediate effect of Activator vs. Meric adjustment on acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1995;18:453-6.
22. Yurkiw D, Mior S. Comparison of two chiropractic techniques on pain and lateral flexion in neck pain patients: a pilot study. Chiropract Tech 1996;8:155-62.
23. Keller TS, Colloca CJ. Mechanical force spinal manipulation increases trunk muscle strength assessed by electromyography: a comparative clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23:585-95.
24. Wood TG, Colloca CJ, Matthews R. A pilot randomized clinical trial on the relative effect of instrumental (MFMA) versus manual (HVLA) manipulation in the treatment of cervical spine dysfunction. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:260-71.
25. Kaigle AM, Holm SH, Hansson TH. 1997 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies. Kinematic behavior of the porcine lumbar spine: a chronic lesion model. Spine 1997;22:2796-806.
26. Kaigle AM, Pope MH, Fleming BC, et al. A method for the intravital measurement of interspinous kinematics. J Biomech 1992;25:451-6.