Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis

Spine Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 5-11

  Wong, David A ^a   Annesser, Betsy ^a   Birney, Tim ^b   Lamond, Roderick ^c   Kumar, Anant ^d   Johnson, Stephen ^c   Jatana, Sanjay ^d   Ghiselli, Gary ^d  

^a PRESBYTERIAN ST LUKE S MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b University of South Dakota School of Medicine   (United States)

^c Western Neurological   (United States)

^d Denver Spine Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty contraindications; Facet arthritis; Lumbar disc arthroplasty; Lumbar fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JOINT LIMITATION; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL PAIN; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MOBILITY; SPONDYLOSIS; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; ZYGAPOPHYSEAL JOINT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPINE;

EID: 33845737060     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. de Kleuver M., Oner F., and Jacobs W. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systemic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 12 (2003) 108-116
2. Gamradt S., and Wang J. Lumbar disc arthroplasty, contemporary concepts in spine care. Spine J 5 (2005) 95-103
3. Guyer R., and Ohnmeiss D. Intervertebral disc prostheses. Spine 28 15S (2003) S15-S23
4. Huang R., Girardi F., Cammisa F., Tropiano P., and Marnay T. Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the Prodisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord 16 (2003) 435-440
5. Blumenthal S., Ohnmeiss D., Guyer R., and Hochschuler S. Prospective study evaluating total disc replacement: preliminary results. J Spinal Disord 16 (2003) 450-454
6. Rodts M. Total disc replacement arthroplasty. Orthopaed Nursing 23 (2004) 216-219
7. Bao Q., and Yuan H. Prosthetic disc replacement: the future?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394 (2002) 139-145
8. Tropiano P., Huang R., Girardi F., and Marnay T. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord 16 (2003) 362-368
9. Bertagnoli R., and Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl. 2 (2002) S131-S136
10. Huang R., Lim M., Girardi F., and Cammissa F. The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients. Spine 29 (2004) 2538-2541
11. Hochschuler S., Ohnmeiss D., Guyer R., and Blumenthal S. Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 11 (2002) S106-S110
12. Zeegers W., Bohnen L., Laaper M., and Verhaegen M. Artificial disc replacement with the Modular Type SB Charite III: 2 year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8 (1999) 210-217
13. Mayer H., Weichert K., Korge A., and Qose I. Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 11 (2002) S124-S130
14. Cinotti G., David T., and Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow up period of 2 years. Spine 21 (1996) 995-1000
15. Cinotti G., David T., and Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow up period of 2 years. Spine 21 (1996) 995-1000
16. van Ooij A., Oner F., and Verbout A. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite Disc. J Spinal Disord 16 (2003) 369-383
17. Zigler J., Burd T., Vialle E., Sachs B., Rashbaum R., and Ohnmeiss D. Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J. Spinal Disord 16 (2003) 352-361
18. Klara P., and Ray C. Artificial nucleus replacement. Spine 12 (2002) 1374-1377
19. Bao Q., and Yuan H. New technologies in spine: nucleus replacement. Spine 27 (2002) 1245-1247
20. Charite Surgeon Manual. DePuy Spine, 2004.
21. Kirkaldy-Willis W., Wedge J., Yong-Hing K., and Reilly J. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine 3 (1978) 319-328
22. In: Kirkaldy-Willis W., and Bernard Jr. T. (Eds). Managing low back pain. 4th ed. (1999), Churchill Livingstone, New York
23. Macnab I. The traction spur: an indicator of segmental instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53 (1971) 663-670
24. Farfan H., and Kirkaldy-Willis W. The present status of spinal fusion in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral joint disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res 158 (1981) 198-215
25. Thompson J.P., Pearce R.H., Schechter M.T., Adams M.E., Tsang I.K.Y., and Bishop P.B. Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15 (1990) 411-415
26. Thalgott J., Albert T., Vaccaro A., et al. A new classification system for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine based on magnetic resonance imaging, provocative discography, plain radiographs and anatomic considerations. Spine J 4 (2004) S167-S172
27. Novarro G. Overview of the artificial disc market. New York: Bank of America Securities, June 14, 2004.
28. Hsu M. Total disc arthroplasty market (2004), Bear Stearns & Co, New York
29. Abelson R, Petersen M. An operation to ease back pain bolsters the bottom line, too. New York Times. Dec. 31, 2003.
30. Deyo R., Nachemson A., and Mirza S. Spinal-fusion surgery-the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 722-726